How about adding a longneck or sharptooth to that team? The Land Before Time is a Lucasfilm movie, and who doesn't want a dinosaur helping him or her?
Coincidentally someone on Moviebob's blog said they liked the prequels and that the original trilogy was boring. I am DEAD fucking seriousApollo45 said:The ability to create crappy prequels is insignificant when compared to the righteous ass kicking that comes from a director wronged.
And anyone who liked the prequels needs to see a doctor. They were crimes against all that is cool and nerdy in the world, and should be thrown in to Mount Doom.
As always, there are "fans" who seek to destroy. But listen carefully, young padwan, and I shall explain the heart of the True fan.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:But too many adults who should really know better are bitching about George Lucas not doing what they want, as opposed to what he thinks is right for his series of kids films.
*begins slow clap*The_root_of_all_evil said:As always, there are "fans" who seek to destroy. But listen carefully, young padwan, and I shall explain the heart of the True fan.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:But too many adults who should really know better are bitching about George Lucas not doing what they want, as opposed to what he thinks is right for his series of kids films.
*snip*
Logic of the ending; to make Star Wars look bad, and make Star Trek look even better by comparison was the reasoning to do it.HankMan said:That ending was... illogical.
You duel well, sir. Let me riposte slightly.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Good points, well made. But allow me to respond with a few of my own:The_root_of_all_evil said:Snip
It's unsaid. It's implicit. That's where we should have left it. DV is a total goit but when he walks through the steam, you're petrified. He's a dire, dark looming presence. Not a troubled teen. He's a badass.*snipped to the point*
Therefore, an unsaid but quite implicit message is made in the OT: Anakin Skywalker was a douchebag.
But there's no way you can expect this guy to be a protagonist then. He's the classic "friend gone bad". DV shouldn't have been anything more than a sketchnote in the prequels.He wasn't some virtuous, noble fallen warrior, he was a troubled individual who gave in to his appetite for causing pain and suffering. Anyone willing to betray the Jedi Order, side with the Emperor, destroy entire planets and kill their own men for failure must have been a pretty colossal prick to start off with.
See, I don't believe they did. After Star Wars, there would be Star Wars themed everything.They brought a whole new generation of kids the same excitement and awe that you older guys experienced with the originals.
If I remember rightly...You, as the older generation, may not have enjoyed them as much, but then ask yourself: What exactly were your parents thinking as they sat in the cinema with you watching the OT.
See, I disagree here because I think you're being too harsh on us older fans.This is my final point, and one that isn't made enough: The Star Wars films didn't get worse with the prequels. All that happened is that the old fanboys started watching it with their parents' eyes, not the eyes of the kids who went and saw the OT all those summers ago.
This is also mis-informed.If you honestly expected to watch a new Star Wars film as a grown adult, and not see the flaws in George Lucas' directing style, then more fool you. You're all grown-up now, and kids films are never going to have the same effect on you as they did when you were a kid. And no matter how much people try, that cannot be blamed on George Lucas. It's simply called "adulthood".
To all of you, I shall give you this quote:Teiraa said:of ocurse they are better in many ways,(visuals, combat, etc)but the great thing about the originals was they made that entire new universe without a alot of todays tech. i personally would love remakes of the originals, but it would be almost impossible to do without the old charactersJabberwock xeno said:As did I...lee1287 said:I liked the films....
Better than the orginals, in fact.