j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Fronzel said:
That's clever.
It's a shame the Ewok's defeat of the stormtroopers just comes off as a series of slapstick jokes.
Maybe if you're only half-watching. There's also a lot of Ewoks getting fried with lasers, Ewoks getting trampled on by AT-STs, Ewoks grieving over their dead companions... if you actually
look at the battle, there's a few slapstick scenes juxtaposed with scenes of carnage, destruction and death. It's
not a Charlie Chaplin skit in the jungle, despite what a lot of others on this thread would like to think.
Ok, so when the Ewoks suffer losses, it's not funny, but virtually every time they succeed, and especially towards the end of the battle when they are winning the whole thing, it
is a series of slapstick jokes. Is this wild swinging in tone supposed to be a good thing? None of the space battles, or the losing battle on Hoth, were full of jokes. Why this one? Not to mention it makes it hard to take this idea of an overlooked, low-tech people defeating a arrogant, high-tech people seriously.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Star Wars is, and always has been, a children's movie! It's a good vs evil fable, set in space, with simplistic characters and lots of goofy looking aliens. It's not Pulp Fiction, it's not Cape Fear, and it's certainly not Schindler's bloody List. There's a reason why everyone shoots each other with laser guns as opposed to real guns, why no-one uses language stronger than 'heck', and why Yoda is a green googly-eyed muppet. The films are, and always have been, aimed first and foremost at kids. Sure, they're certainly enjoyable for adults too, much like a Pixar movie.
I don't see your point here. I don't recall asking for bloody violence or anything (I don't appreciate you putting words in my mouth, by the way) and "slapstick" and "gore" are not the two choices for depicting this battle scene.
And I hope you aren't trying to pull that "it's for kids, it doesn't have to make sense" schtick, especially since you say that adults are supposed to be able to enjoy it too. Again, I'll ask why the Endor battle is the only battle in the original series that has so much silliness in it. The Phantom Menace does, but that was shit.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
But too many adults who should really know better are bitching about George Lucas not doing what they want, as opposed to what he thinks is right for his series of kids films. If you didn't like RotJ, or the new films, then fine. Move on. Find something else to enjoy instead.
Authors are not sacred and their right to continue their work doesn't mean they can't make mistakes or should be spared criticism. If they have any integrity as artists, they must listen. Art is about art, not ego.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
I find it strange how those who ***** the most about George Lucas like to call themselves the 'true' Star Wars fans. Yet, by my mathematics, they only like around 2 (maybe 2 and a half) of the 6 films that make up the series. That's not even half. Whereas I can enjoy all of them (even Phantom Menace), yet apparantly that means I'm not a 'true' fan of the series? In order to be a true SW fan, you have to hate and ***** about the very series you profess to love?
Fine, you be a "true fan of the series" and I'll be someone who doesn't like shit.
I also don't see why you think affection equals unconditional acceptance. Maybe someone who likes Star Wars would be unhappy when they see it being less than what they think it can be? If a "true fan" would like anything Star Wars, why shouldn't Lucas just make whatever would be easiest for him, since the actual quality of the work wouldn't matter? Oh, wait...
Star Wars should not be liked because it's Star Wars, it should be liked because it's good.
If it's good.