Which console for ME?

Recommended Videos

BaldursBananaSoap

New member
May 20, 2009
1,573
0
0
Probably a ps3 for you since you can pretty much get all 360s exclusives on PC. Don't worry about the online services there both nothing compared to steam and the 360s online is ruled by kids.
 

ZodiacBraves

New member
Jun 26, 2008
189
0
0
Mazty said:
XBOX 360
- I've heard that cross platform titles usually play better on the 360. True?
True yes, but the difference is barely noticable, plus it's not true for every game. For example, Crysis 2 looks much better on the PS3, and GTA4 doesn't suffer from dissapeaing scenery on the PS3 as it does on the 360
- Some people believe the 360 is starting to show its age and that it is at the end of its lifecycle. True?
It is true. The 360 made no technological jumps when it was released, and it's tech specs therefore are pretty bad - a tricore processor, and DVD player. Because of this, games are limited in size (more discs = higher production cost which publishers dislike), and also don't look anything special. Most of the games that look good use the UT engine, which, depending on how good you are at noticing detail, is just over-bloomed textures.
- The infamous RROD. If I get myself a brand new Xbox 360 tomorrow, will it be RROD-failsafe?
Nope, all 360's suffer from the RROD. The problem was that the 360 was released a year before the technicians were happy with it, so an actual RROD proof 360 would probably look different and cost much more.
- Any exclusives on the Xbox 360 that I should miss out on?
The 360 lacks quality exclusives. At the moment all it has is Gears of War 2 and Fable 2, which are good games, but short. Halo 3 is coming to PC (Check the Windows 7 trailers). A lot of the 360's exclusives are just timed, whereas the PS3 exclusives are encoded specifically for the Cell CPU, have better graphics than the 360, and are too large to fit on DVD. Whether they are better games is subjective, but from a tech point of view, they are.

PS3
- The new PS3 slim seems small and quiet.
It is, but apparently the HDD is more noisy, but overall the console is quieter. Either way, the PS3 is a very quiet console, makes less noise than the PS2 in my experience.
- I'm not that much into FF or MGS.
As you said you like FPS' you'd probably love Killzone 2, depending on your level of skill. It looks great, has the best map design I've ever seen and plays better than most FPS'. If realism isn't your style, then Resistance 2 is a hell of a good laugh online. 30 vs 30 with no spawn points and large, well thought out maps is great pick-up-and-play fun.
- Flower looks awesome.
It is, but it's short, only 6 levels (I think a 7th secret level). But it is nice and relaxing, and looks stunning on a good HDTV as it's in full 1080p, giving the viewer and orgy of colour to look at.
- The PS3 is more futureproof... true?
I guess so. The components can't be changed, but as far as graphics go, Crytek said that no game has fully used the power of the PS3, and yet MGS4 and Killzone 2 have some of the best, if not best (Yep, better the Crysis) graphics I have ever seen. Plus, as the console has a bluray player, it means as games get bigger, and data transfer speeds need to be higher, the console can handle it. Plus the OS is great. Can stream almost any media to it from your PC, or just put media on to a data stick and plug it into the PS3.
- More powerful hardware? I've heard information contradicting this which is saying the 360 has better graphics capacity.
The PS3 is better in everyway than the 360. Yes, the 360 has a slightly better GPU than the PS3 BUT the PS3's CPU can also render very effectively, meaning the PS3 is a hell of a lot faster than the 360, and has much better graphics capabilities. Plus you can change the HDD to a faster SATA one, or even a top of the range SDD if you want. Having seen 2 demos of SDD in the PS3, one from over a year ago had the SDD performing more slowly then the standard HDD, and the one from the beginning of this month had an SDD performing the same as the standard HDD. Therefore, it'd seem that when SDD's are cheaper and better, they should perform much better than a regular physical HDD.

And now that the 360 Elite and PS3 are the same price, I'd go for the PS3 as it has better exclusives and is future proof. Plus, Sony Motion could be great for hardcore games, with the EyeToy doing everything that Natal is planned to do. Sadly, Sony do shoot themselves in the foot by not pushing this kind of information.
No offence, but your point is kind of invalidated by the level of bias you seem to have against the 360
 

Nadlice

New member
Jun 3, 2009
166
0
0
Who'd of though a PS3 or 360 thread would have been full of fanboys (or people who are biased), stealthily discrediting the "enemy" system.

My advice, research the exclusives, and pick which one you like the exclusives of more. Unless you have a bluray, there is no HUGE difference in the systems. Isn't there a warrenty for RROD? Just asking.
 

ZodiacBraves

New member
Jun 26, 2008
189
0
0
To the OP,

Being a PC gamer who owns a 360 I would say to you, get the PS3 and learn to like the controller.

Don't get me wrong, the 360 is a great console, with a very large internet community, but I find any of the interesting "Exclusives" end up on the PC as well and I usually get them for the PC.

The PS3 on the other hand is a console that I am really interesting in buying. At the last E3 it announced some very interesting games coming out that I suggest you check out. A Bluray player would be nice, seeing how it is becoming the new media for movies.

I guess I would just say in closing, the reason you should get a PS3 is because the 360 feels too close to a PC in terms of games to play.
 

Doc Theta Sigma

New member
Jan 5, 2009
1,451
0
0
Mazty said:
KingTeabag said:
I would say go with Xbox, personally.

- I really like the 360 controller. It is sturdy, it also comes in wired and wireless forms. Although the D-Pad is spongey.
- I've heard that cross platform titles usually play better on the 360. True? This only really true in racing and shooting games.
- XBLA seems to have a lot of cool games. Yes it does. Portal: Still Alive, Castle Crashers, Shadow Complex, Worms 2: Armaggedon, Mega Man 9 and Geometry Wars 2 to name a few.
- Xbox Live seems nice but I won't play a lot of games online since the only online game I play is TF2 which I play on the PC anyway. It will have Facebook, Last FM and Twitter soon. It has a vast number of movies available to rent online (The Matrix, Shaun of the Dead and all that good stuff) and is a good way to stay in touch with friends.
- Some people believe the 360 is starting to show its age and that it is at the end of its lifecycle. True? WRONG.
- The infamous RROD. If I get myself a brand new Xbox 360 tomorrow, will it be RROD-failsafe? Keep it in a mostly open space, and don't let it get clogged up with dust are good anti-RROD methods. Sometimes you will get the RROD if you play it for MASSIVE periods of time, but just leave it for a bit and it will work again. Also, newer models have a lower fail-rate.
- Any exclusives on the Xbox 360 that I should miss out on? Next year is the year of the Xbox, with big name exclusives being released such as: Fable 3, Crackdown 2, Halo: Reach, Splinter Cell: Conviction and Alan Wake. Also the Gears of War series, Viva Pinata, Halo 3, Fable 2 and Left 4 dead are good existing exclusives.

No change of keeping things unbiased and mentioning the PS3?
Just thought I'd put it out there...
Plus, Halo 3, Gears of War 1, and Left 4 Dead are not exclusives.


Uh... Yes they are? I know they're on PC, but I'm pretty sure they're in the Games for Windows format, so they're still exclusive to Microsoft.
 

fenixrising

New member
Mar 11, 2009
190
0
0
to be utterly honest mate i wouldn't buy either.
i don't think there are enough games that are different to PC games to warrant you spending the cash
but if you really want a console to just break from pc gaming, heres an out of the box suggestion for you. for about £100 (100 euro, $200 ish) you could buy a ps2, an original xbox and a pile of classic games (plus the price of xbox games and ps2 games are so cheap, really cheap) you can then use the left over cash to upgrade your PC.
win win situation, unless your a graphics whore or elitist and demand current technology
 

shadewind

New member
Aug 17, 2009
41
0
0
Hello, thanks for the informative answers. Although some people seem a bit biased. I will kindly disregard anyone who cannot point out anything which is better on the "other" console :)

Regarding exclusives... Left 4 Dead is hardly a 360 exclusive since I have here on my Steam account. Splinter Cell: Conviction seems to be coming to be coming to the PC as well. Though I must say I'm extremely interested in Alan Wake as it seems kind of Silent Hill-ish and the PC version has apparently been cancelled.

What are the exclusives for the PS3 right now and what exclusives are in the making?
 

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
Pick the one your friends have, so you can play with them, and borrow games from each other.
 

Doc Theta Sigma

New member
Jan 5, 2009
1,451
0
0
Mazty said:
Doc Theta Sigma said:
Mazty said:
Ooddude said:
1-this would be easier with a poll
2-360 the end of it's life is not true, ever heard of Natal?
Natal = EyeToy.
PS3 Wand = Wiimote
With real-time, sub-millimeter precision, and seeing yourself on screen at the same time?
Wow, Wii's must have come a long way in the last 3 days since I last played on one!
I was just pointing out it works both ways but since you seem to be bias towards Sony, I'm just going to ignore you. Have a nice day :D
 

Doc Theta Sigma

New member
Jan 5, 2009
1,451
0
0
Mazty said:
Doc Theta Sigma said:
Mazty said:
Doc Theta Sigma said:
Mazty said:
Ooddude said:
1-this would be easier with a poll
2-360 the end of it's life is not true, ever heard of Natal?
Natal = EyeToy.
PS3 Wand = Wiimote
With real-time, sub-millimeter precision, and seeing yourself on screen at the same time?
Wow, Wii's must have come a long way in the last 3 days since I last played on one!
I was just pointing out it works both ways but since you seem to be bias towards Sony, I'm just going to ignore you. Have a nice day :D
Troll alert.
I was showing how it doesn't work both ways, all you have replied with is: "You gave points which I can't defend against, therefore I will label you a name and scoot off".
Nice going there.
Actually all you pointed out was the difference in performance, not technology. Natal and the Eyetoy have essentially the same technology, as do the PS3 Wand and the Wiimote. But anyway, I can see there's no point trying to argue with you since you're convinced you are eternally right.
 

diptochowdhury

New member
Aug 14, 2009
12
0
0
in my experience with both consoles it comes down to one thing, what your looking for in a console. the advantages of the 360 is that is online is way better than sony's and add-ons for games come months-years earlier for 360 games (the ps3 version of fallout 3 doesnt have any addons yet availible while all the addons to be published have already been released for 360) and you can play almost all the original xbox games on the 360 and you cant play and ps2 games on the new ps3s. youll need to get a 60gig one to play ps3 games but those arent in development anymore so youll have to get it second hand. the xbox has a stronger lineup of games than 360 and the new motion sensitive Project Natal looks awesome, better than it's competitors, check out Natal. and as for the RROD. if you want to fully avoid that than get a 260 elite system since they have added heatsinks, falcon 65nm chips and the matte black finish helps to expel heat from the system. play the 360 on its side becuase it hasa hughe row of fans along the bottom and i can guarantee you wont get a RROD (assuming its an elite). the only things better about the ps3 is that its graphics are slightly, slightly better. and thats only if you have a full HD TV set, in standard defition, 360 and ps3 graphics are the same. and unnoticeably ebtter on HD. also the online is free, but worse than the 360's. and the hardware is better for the ps3 so it can have more in depth games, like MAG which is an MMO shooter, but the graphics and the hardware means that ps3 games take more time to make and are more expensive. an average 360 game cost 40 quid while a ps3 one cant cost above 50 pounds. and the games development taking longer means that there will be approximately 3 xbox 360 games for every 1 ps3 game. in conclusion, id say get the 360. i have one, so thumbs up to that! dont listen to anything about the 360 having its life cycle finisehd. if you watch microsoft's e3 press conference, it says that they are intending to continue the 360 and, i quote, "it's not even halfway through it's lifecycle yet" so you can look forward to plenty more games and content. and of course halo 3 is a reason to buy the 360 alone! lol. dont make the wrong choice man (or woman? i dont know) get a 360. and may happy gaming days to you.
 

SquirrelPants

New member
Dec 22, 2008
1,729
0
0
Honestly? I would get a Wii. Most of the games are actually fun, and if you can get past that stupid gimmick that most of the games have...Or at least stick with playing that one you've got access to. I wouldn't spend the money on a console, personally, because I can only seem to have fun with two or three of the games I can find for it. If anything, though, I'd say a PS3, because if you feel like playing online, it doesn't cost you money. It's also got some better exclusives, like LittleBigPlanet and MGS4.*

*That game is brilliant, don't listen to all those other dudes.(Or, rather, I thought it was fun)
 

Joeshie

New member
Oct 9, 2007
844
0
0
Honestly, simply based on your comment of controllers, I would suggest getting a 360. Do you really want to play your console games on a controller you don't like?

If you buy a brand new model also, I wouldn't worry about RRoD. Most of the new models have a much lower chance of RRoDing than the old models do.

Also, I would take a look at the exclusives and see which ones you like the best. 360 has some sweet exclusives as well as the PS3. It just comes down to which ones you want more. If you think they both have exclusives on par with one another, I would pick up a 360 because of the controller issue.
 

shadewind

New member
Aug 17, 2009
41
0
0
Some of the upcoming exclusives for the PS3 seems kind of cool. The PS3 seems to have more "niche" games... or at least upcoming ones which can be both a good or bad thing.

I have a 360 controller which I'm using with my PC and I absolutely love the way I almost do not have to hold on to it, it fits firmly in my hand and I can relax completely. I do agree though, the D-pad is a bit rubbish if you want "precision" I never play fighting games, though, so it's pretty much a non-issue.

Are there any good 3rd party controllers for the PS3 that are more like the 360 pad?
 

diptochowdhury

New member
Aug 14, 2009
12
0
0
XBOX 360
- I've heard that cross platform titles usually play better on the 360. True?

True yes, but the difference is barely noticable, plus it's not true for every game. For example, Crysis 2 looks much better on the PS3, and GTA4 doesn't suffer from dissapeaing scenery on the PS3 as it does on the 360
- Some people believe the 360 is starting to show its age and that it is at the end of its lifecycle. True?

It is true. The 360 made no technological jumps when it was released, and it's tech specs therefore are pretty bad - a tricore processor, and DVD player. Because of this, games are limited in size (more discs = higher production cost which publishers dislike), and also don't look anything special. Most of the games that look good use the UT engine, which, depending on how good you are at noticing detail, is just over-bloomed textures.
not true, look at things like project natal and the likes coming out, read my other comment for the full details.
- The infamous RROD. If I get myself a brand new Xbox 360 tomorrow, will it be RROD-failsafe?
Nope, all 360's suffer from the RROD. The problem was that the 360 was released a year before the technicians were happy with it, so an actual RROD proof 360 would probably look different and cost much more.
Also bullshit,and elite has the superior hardware that means it is rrod proof, especially if you play it on its side. it was brought out six months after the originals becuase they suffered the most and the elite system was microsoft's reply to the RROD.
- Any exclusives on the Xbox 360 that I should miss out on?
The 360 lacks quality exclusives. At the moment all it has is Gears of War 2 and Fable 2, which are good games, but short. Halo 3 is coming to PC (Check the Windows 7 trailers). A lot of the 360's exclusives are just timed, whereas the PS3 exclusives are encoded specifically for the Cell CPU, have better graphics than the 360, and are too large to fit on DVD. Whether they are better games is subjective, but from a tech point of view, they are.
And what does the ps3 have? not much seeing as you're not a metal gear of ff fan. resistance and killzone are the best you can hope or, and gears of war 2 and fable 2 arent short, theyre extremely long! and if you like fps check out left 4 dead and left 4 dead 2.

PS3
- The new PS3 slim seems small and quiet.
It is, but apparently the HDD is more noisy, but overall the console is quieter. Either way, the PS3 is a very quiet console, makes less noise than the PS2 in my experience.
- I'm not that much into FF or MGS.
As you said you like FPS' you'd probably love Killzone 2, depending on your level of skill. It looks great, has the best map design I've ever seen and plays better than most FPS'. If realism isn't your style, then Resistance 2 is a hell of a good laugh online. 30 vs 30 with no spawn points and large, well thought out maps is great pick-up-and-play fun.
- Flower looks awesome.
It is, but it's short, only 6 levels (I think a 7th secret level). But it is nice and relaxing, and looks stunning on a good HDTV as it's in full 1080p, giving the viewer and orgy of colour to look at.
- The PS3 is more futureproof... true?
I guess so. The components can't be changed, but as far as graphics go, Crytek said that no game has fully used the power of the PS3, and yet MGS4 and Killzone 2 have some of the best, if not best (Yep, better the Crysis) graphics I have ever seen. Plus, as the console has a bluray player, it means as games get bigger, and data transfer speeds need to be higher, the console can handle it. Plus the OS is great. Can stream almost any media to it from your PC, or just put media on to a data stick and plug it into the PS3. there is no way o say the ps is futureproof. you cannot say that based on facts, nothing is futureproof.
- More powerful hardware? I've heard information contradicting this which is saying the 360 has better graphics capacity.
The PS3 is better in everyway than the 360. Yes, the 360 has a slightly better GPU than the PS3 BUT the PS3's CPU can also render very effectively, meaning the PS3 is a hell of a lot faster than the 360, and has much better graphics capabilities. Plus you can change the HDD to a faster SATA one, or even a top of the range SDD if you want. Having seen 2 demos of SDD in the PS3, one from over a year ago had the SDD performing more slowly then the standard HDD, and the one from the beginning of this month had an SDD performing the same as the standard HDD. Therefore, it'd seem that when SDD's are cheaper and better, they should perform much better than a regular physical HDD.
If the 360 has a better GPU then the ps3 obiviously isn't better than the 360 in every way is it?? plus the fact that almost every ps3 game comes out for he 360 as well, so what does hardware matter, unless you're really into that graphics thing.

And now that the 360 Elite and PS3 are the same price, I'd go for the PS3 as it has better exclusives and is future proof. Plus, Sony Motion could be great for hardcore games, with the EyeToy doing everything that Natal is planned to do. Sadly, Sony do shoot themselves in the foot by not pushing this kind of information.
just had to correct this guy a few times. the ps3 isnt futureproof, microsoft has NO plans to end the 360 lifecycle, games for the 360 arent short and if you get an elite, it is almost guaranteed you will never experience an RROD.
 

Pillypill

New member
Aug 7, 2009
506
0
0
I own a 360 and PS3, I'd recomend the 360, not because i think it, leaps and bounds ahead of the PS3, but from the information you've placed before us, it seems to be more your bang baby. =]

360 showing it's age?: I've never thought so.

PS3 has better grphics: yes, but it depends on the game. Gears 2 on 360 looked better than MGS4. I thought so.though it's not future proof. Eventualy it will be replaced, it's slow, but it is quiet .

Oh and the 360 you can get cheap too.
 

VicunaBlue

New member
Feb 8, 2009
684
0
0
I'd go ps3, If only because at this point you might get a few more years out of it. I personally like the exclusives for it better, but ive never been a halo fan. also if you dont like the Daulshock 3, try this

http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/02/09/review-dreamgear-ps3-shadow-wireless-controller