I'm offended by this comic, it has hurt my feelings and I'm disappointed with its casual use of racism disguised as comedy.
I would like an apology from its creators.
I would like an apology from its creators.
the small difference is that over the last 50+x Years the Jokes that you Want are there. And they are made by people with privilege, by people who NEVER will have to live with the consequences of their harmful stereotyping which sticks in the heads of people, adds to the cross-race effect and the existing inequality.Super Not Cosmo said:Well I'd like to invite you to take this same idea and make a comics poking fun at Muslim terrorists or cheap Jewish people or maybe lazy blacks on welfare. That wouldn't be offensive in the least because you wouldn't be making fun of the entire culture just a small subset of Muslims that happen to be terrorists or a small subset of Jews that happen to be cheap or a small subset of blacks that happen to be lazy and on welfare. It's their problem if they take your criticism of one sub group as criticism of an entire culture after all. Right?Grey Carter said:My problem isn't with a position, it's with an attitude. The WGDF quite obviously represent a small, but vocal, subset of largely white males who respond to any perceived threat to their cultural dominance with hyperbole and hostility. They also tend to interpret criticism of one sub group as criticism of an entire culture. In that respect, yes, you have proved my point.
I wouldn't care if he had a bag of backing soda and some zip lock bags. Point is, he was doing nothing illegal at the time. Painting Martian is a criminal is just a red harring to distract from the fact that Zimmerman could have prevented this whole thing.madwarper said:There's also no evidence to support this "friend" wasn't a connection for illegally obtaining prescription strength Codeine.
I mean, Martin was found with Skittles and a fruit drink, it's not like he had candy and soft drink that's two thirds of a narcotic cocktail which induces paranoia that Martin had been known to consume when he had bragged about it almost a year prior on his facebook chat.
I disagree, the funniest thing about discrimination is that it is indiscriminate; anyone, anywhere can discriminate against another person for any number of reasons.Phrozenflame500 said:No, in the first-world you are not going to get discriminated against if you're a straight, white man.
This brings up a fantastic point, and this comic's comment section is a perfect example of what shrekfan is talking about. What with "the same people shouting the same arguments" over and over again. And shrek's right: I do groan every time I see a topic about genders/racism/sexism/anything that's "controversial" because I know 2 things are going to be true about it:shrekfan246 said:Now, I'm not offended by the comic, but what if you're annoyed and/or displeased at all of the discussion of sexism and/or racism in gaming because the threads constantly clog up our forums and dissuade people from making and engaging in otherwise much more interesting and potentially amusing threads? Because the threads about sexism and/or racism in gaming always end up the same way, with the same people shouting the same arguments at each other and no one gets anywhere because we're a bunch of people on an internet forum and there's nothing we can do to actually impact the situation in the industry?Agayek said:Ugh. The hypocrisy in this thread is rather galling.
ATTENTION: Anyone who was offended by this comic and has ever expressed annoyance and/or displeasure at the discussion of sexism or racism in gaming is a massive hypocrite and needs to physically castrate themselves immediately to prevent your particular brand of stupidity from contaminating the gene pool.
If you fall into that category, i have but three words for you: "Deal With It"
There's a good discussion to be had about potentially racist or sexist individuals making the decisions in the industry. I won't deny that. But the day it's actually had on the internet is the day people stop starting flame wars over My Little Pony, the day people stop smugly accusing rap or metal of "just being noise", the day people can acknowledge that Call of Duty is generally a solidly-built game and not literally the worst thing in the history of the human race (exaggeration). And I, for one, don't think that day will come in my lifetime.
It's a little bit of both.RJ 17 said:Just for the record though, shrekfan, CoD doesn't get hated on because of the way it's built. It is indeed a fantastically made FPS with good controls, good customization, and fun game modes. CoD gets hated on because of the stereotypical types of players that play CoD. By that I mean your cursing 13 year olds, your racial-slut spewing jackasses, your perfectionist "I dashboard-out if my KDR falls beneath 10 to 1" people. Basically the types of people that send death threats to the game developers because a patch made the reload time for their favorite gun go from 1.02 seconds to 1.07.
I completely agree. However, neither was Zimmerman doing anything illegal when he saw Martin, grew suspicious, got out of his car and followed after him.Shadowstar38 said:Point is, he was doing nothing illegal at the time.
First, simply saying this could have been prevented by Zimmerman is ignoring the vast, complex chain of events that lead to that event that night. There are several people that could have prevented this.Painting Martian is a criminal is just a red harring to distract from the fact that Zimmerman could have prevented this whole thing.
So, you admit toAnyway, the proof thing was just some random bullshit to pour fuel on the fire.
No, I couldn't. Poe's Law and whatnot.As you can tell by some of my responses, I'm not taking this all too seriously.
A lot of confusion about this comic tends to come from a lack of familiarity with certain men's movements on the internet. Personally, I've had enough run-ins with Men's Rights Activists and Pick-Up Artist types that the comic made perfect sense to me. If you haven't seen paragraphs of gibberish from an MRA type, then I envy you.ShakerSilver said:Is this supposed to be funny? Yes, I got the comic, but where's the joke? Is the joke that white people are racist? Because if it were, then that's an awful generalization. And even if the joke is about a vocal minority, the comics still mocks the use of charts and stats, and calls these people murderers.
Remember when we used to talk about video games? I don't. Seriously, almost all of the "hot topics" I hear about games now are about all the different "-isms" that make conversations about politics and agendas of the creators/critics than the actual game content.I'm actually saddened by the fact that 4chan, of all places, is the only place where I can talk about games without any of these topics being brought up.
Well you're certainly right about that. I too served my time in WoW from the very start till the end of Burning Crusade when I decided enough was enough. I thoroughly enjoyed my time spent there and don't regret it.....much. Though I won't deny the negative impact it had on my social life.shrekfan246 said:The overreacting people are certainly a big part of it, but that doesn't really make the game itself terrible, as many people around here love to claim. It can be argued that a multi-player-centric game lives or dies on its community and as such the relative quality of the game can be judged on the quality of its community, but for some reason I don't get the impression that many of the CoD-haters are really considering it that deeply. Or at least, I never see the arguments get that type of actual backing; Usually it's just "CoD sucks because of all the idiotic kids playing it!!!" And I don't really approve of that kind of unsubstantiated claim, because years of playing World of Warcraft has taught me that no matter what game you're playing online, if you're going into something with a group of randoms, there's an 85% chance it's going to suck and you're going to be miserable. (And before somebody jumps on me over that, yes, I know "85% chance" is a made-up statistic and unsubstantiated claim. That's not the point.)
And I was going to touch on this in my previous post as well but it slipped my mind. A lot of people don't like it purely because of how popular it is. I think it's just a form of good ol' fashioned "Hipster Mentality". "Look at all these juvenile, immature pleebs playing their modern military shooter. PISHAH AND PISH! I'm far too refined to find such a mainstream game to be entertaining." As I mentioned the one thing you can't criticize CoD for is being poorly made. As Yahtzee pointed out in his Gears of War 2 review: "Sometimes it stands to remember that popular things are popular for a reason." Really the only reason I fell out of CoD was simply because my friends stopped playing it. And the only reason they stopped playing it was because they suddenly received the genetic enhancements necessary to join the PC Master Race.Of course, occasionally you also get the people who claim that CoD is terrible simply because it's a massive seller in the industry right now. I've tried to engage on this point, as well, as "Well, [Previously Single-Player Franchise] is adding multi-player!" isn't indicative of a developer trying to 'appeal to the CoD crowd' (especially if the franchise in question isn't even a shooter). I've tried to ask them to prove the impact Call of Duty has had on even the influx of military shooters; Medal of Honor is dead, Spec Ops only just became relevant after years of being around because it satirized Call of Duty, Battlefield is the only other direct competition to Call of Duty, and things like ArmA are too niche to really be considered as having the same effect on game releases. On the grand scale of things, that's a tiny number of games being released per year that are military shooters, regardless of how many copies they might move.
Heh, that last panel is just golden.Monxeroth said:snip
No, it is not what I did. It is how you read it or what you assumed I meant.Trilligan said:Because that's what you did.Abomination said:Why did YOU assume I was trying to paint black people as worse than white people?
How is that not clear?