Ironically it technically does, and from the exact same point in history no less, but from the other side. "Cracker" refers to the cracking of a whip, not the salted grain product. So yeah it does have a historical context but not a demeaning one. If anything THAT slur is demeaning to black people as well.Lilani said:The difference between "******" and "cracker" in my mind is that "******" has actually been used to refer to people who are actually being subjugated and treated in the most vile ways. "Cracker" has no such historical background in blood and torture
I always figured that I don't find it offensive because it's a "ghetto" word and I don't live in "da ghetto."Vykrel said:it is a racial slur. if you are of another race and you maliciously refer to a white person as a "cracker", you are a racist.
we just dont find it offensive. probably because it doesnt sound very harsh. neither does "honkey", or "white boy".
Yes you are damnit! Now get back in the wrapper with the rest of us!Asuka Soryu said:Yes! I am not a crunchy, salty, snack!
Is it because you think they're calling you a crispy topping holder served at parties? cause they're not.SaneAmongInsane said:I mean I knew it was suppose to be a racial slur. And I know human trafficking still exist in this world, I was just talking specifically on black/white relations in the United States... Which I don't know about the world over, but the fact that at one time one could legally and openly own another human being in this country like cattle is fucked up.Magenera said:You didn't know that Cracker/cracka was a racial slur? Also my ancestors where enslaved and sold by group's of my own race, slavery then and still now is a business that prevails. As I said before in another thread the Defense might have done a reversal. But yeah it is a racial slur that probably means shit to white people as a whole.SaneAmongInsane said:Been watching a lot of the George Zimmerman case. Last night I was flaberghasted when Erin Burnette of CNN referred to the word as a racial slur.
I'm sorry, but there is not a world where Cracka or Cracker could offend any white person. Right? I mean I'm pretty sure any of hear the word our minds do not jump to our skin colour but to delicious Saltine crackers. It's like calling someone Spaghetti.
Even honky... If I get called a honky the only thing my mind jumps is the old Jefferson's TV show.
Is there any white slur that has any bite at all? I mean I suppose "You impearalist swine whos anncestors kidnapped and enslaved my ancestors for years and then tried to pull that segration bullshit" but that'd be to hard to say in conversation.
I just don't feel the word carries any weight as an insult.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_slaveryWaitWHAT said:Considering that white people have never spent hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed
Actually it is. It uses a racial descriptor (white) and an insult (trash) together to represent a demeaning stereotype. I'd definately call that a racial slur. See also "Raghead" and "Curry-stinker".Steve Waltz said:If you ask me, being called "white trash" is more offensive and that's not even a racial slur.
yeah.. black africans were the ones selling other black africans to the europeans.. They were enslaved to the blacks before they were sold to the whites.HellbirdIV said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_slaveryWaitWHAT said:Considering that white people have never spent hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_labor_in_Germany_during_World_War_II
Yeah, NO-ONE EVER enslaved white people.
It's also worth noting that black Africans have enslaved eachother just as long as Europeans, Middle Easterners, Asians and Native Americans have; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Africa
I hate to be the one to bring actual history to the table, but the Trans-Atlantic, North American slave trade did not invent slavery as a concept, so saying "THIS IS WHY ALL WHITES ARE THE DEVIL" is absolutely ridiculous.
Thanks for ninja'ing me.HellbirdIV said:*snip*
I don't get this sort of logic.PatrickXD said:It's a racial slur, sure. I don't mind the word, but I would be offended if a person who called me a cracka wouldn't let me call them a ******. Or whatever other slur for their particular brand of genes.