Equinsu Ocha!Durgiun said:Hell no, nigga. I'm a cracka-ass, white boy and I don't give a shit who calls me that.
Shit, I don't give a shit about 'white devil' either.
Equinsu Ocha!Durgiun said:Hell no, nigga. I'm a cracka-ass, white boy and I don't give a shit who calls me that.
Shit, I don't give a shit about 'white devil' either.
Really? I can't really imagine calling a person, based on the country they come from. Thinking about it, i would probably pretty weirded out, being called a Kraut while being in another country.Abomination said:And even if not I really wouldn't care... I actually don't mind slang terms for races. We call Americans "Yanks" and the English "Poms" and they don't take much offense.
It's not, at all. "Nigga" and "******" are very different words with different connotations.somonels said:No, as I often try to crack wise so I take it as an encouragement. Using the topical word is like a nigga whipping himself.
Kinda related - is using the word ****** prohibited on this forum and that's why people use nigga? Which is still essentially the same.
If someone calls me a cracker and I call them a ****** and they take offense, that means they meant offense in calling me a cracker. It's the intent of the person in using the word that may or may not offend me.Altorin said:I don't get this sort of logic.PatrickXD said:It's a racial slur, sure. I don't mind the word, but I would be offended if a person who called me a cracka wouldn't let me call them a ******. Or whatever other slur for their particular brand of genes.
a person calls you a slur, one whose root implies that you're a bigot, and your response is to demand the opportunity to prove them right?
seriously dude, think about that long and hard and abandon that logic as soon as possible. it's not a game where you can one up eachother and win. once slurs start flying everyone involved loses. it's a zero-gain system.
******'s race and Nigga's status or relation? So people just use them falsely?OhJohnNo said:It's not, at all. "Nigga" and "******" are very different words with different connotations.somonels said:Kinda related - is using the word ****** prohibited on this forum and that's why people use nigga? Which is still essentially the same.
Honestly, I don't hear "******" used much by anyone except racists anymore. All I know is that I've heard "nigga" used by blacks to refer to white friends all the damn time. Even white people are often allowed to say it.somonels said:******'s race and Nigga's status or relation? So people just use them falsely?OhJohnNo said:It's not, at all. "Nigga" and "******" are very different words with different connotations.somonels said:Kinda related - is using the word ****** prohibited on this forum and that's why people use nigga? Which is still essentially the same.
whatever helps you sleep man. it still sounds bonkers to me. Someone calls me a cracker, first I want to know where the hate comes from, and then I'll probably disassociate myself with that person because they clearly aren't going to show me any respect. It's not an opportunity to get your jollies using a word that basically means "you're not a human being, you're a filthy monkey and I'm going to beat you until you do what I tell you".PatrickXD said:If someone calls me a cracker and I call them a ****** and they take offense, that means they meant offense in calling me a cracker. It's the intent of the person in using the word that may or may not offend me.Altorin said:I don't get this sort of logic.PatrickXD said:It's a racial slur, sure. I don't mind the word, but I would be offended if a person who called me a cracka wouldn't let me call them a ******. Or whatever other slur for their particular brand of genes.
a person calls you a slur, one whose root implies that you're a bigot, and your response is to demand the opportunity to prove them right?
seriously dude, think about that long and hard and abandon that logic as soon as possible. it's not a game where you can one up eachother and win. once slurs start flying everyone involved loses. it's a zero-gain system.
I agree completely, the sooner we stop demonising words rather than intent, the better the world will be.SpunkeyMonkey said:My own wish would be to see all such words allowed and people able to use them as freely as they like, as through constant use in time they would all lose impact, and the politically correct types only give those words their power by highlighting them so much in the first place.
I agree completely. The key point here, however, is your last section. One being way worse does not excuse the other.Lilani said:The difference between "******" and "cracker" in my mind is that "******" has actually been used to refer to people who are actually being subjugated and treated in the most vile ways. "Cracker" has no such historical background in blood and torture, or at least not in such a widespread manner, which is why it "probably means shit to white people as a whole."Magenera said:You didn't know that Cracker/cracka was a racial slur? Also my ancestors where enslaved and sold by group's of my own race, slavery then and still now is a business that prevails. As I said before in another thread the Defense might have done a reversal. But yeah it is a racial slur that probably means shit to white people as a whole.
I believe this is also why sexist/stereotypical images of men[footnote]The bumbling father who doesn't know how to clean house properly, the manchild who refuses to clean a house properly, etc.[/footnote] are still acceptable in media rather than sexist/stereotypical images of women[footnote]The subservient housewife, the woman who doesn't know a hammer from a screwdriver, the woman who can't drive, etc.[/footnote]. One of them has only been used in media to poke fun at a gender. The other represents opinions and notions actually held against the gender in the past, and still to a certain extent in the present. It is considered more offensive to say "Women can't drive" than "Men can't clean a house properly" because there was once a point in time where it was actually felt that women couldn't drive, and in many places laws were put in place to either prohibit or severely handicap women when driving. The idea's still got a bit of a sting to it.
I'm not saying this is right by any means, however I think it is perfectly logical that a term or idea which has no historical significance or potency in its use would be more acceptable. It's not a matter of "double standards" or "reverse racism" or "reverse sexism." It's simply the historical baggage that certain terms and ideas carry.