its the mental part of sword fighting that he lacked he couldn't put himself in the state were he was willing to "sheath the sword" like lan was. Basically Lan accepted death before and it was an old friend the other guy didn't.TheVampwizimp said:I already posted a different answer, but I didn't think of Lan. You're right, he's a supreme badass, and that duel was fricken sweet. Although, I will say that the WoT power rankings are a little out of whack, and I'm not sure I trust them. For example,jurnag12 said:al'Lan Mandrogoran from the Wheel of Time. A swordsman so good that he takes on a bloke who had hundreds of years of practice himself along with being in the top 5 of most powerful magic-users on the planet.
And win.
in the last battle, Gawyn takes on Demandred wearing 3 of those Seanchan rings, making him inhumanly fast and impossible to read. Demandred kicks his ass. But Gawyn is a blademaster of such a high level that he can defeat 2 other blademasters at the same time, one of which is clearly described as nearly as good as Lan himself. So how, exactly, is Lan so much better than a man who is actually almost on the same level, AND wearing magic superspeed rings?