It's funny to me that so many Skyrim fans are quick to defend some of the more egregious bugs by saying, "Well, it is a Bethesda game."
Being made by them makes it okay to have such issues in the engine? Sorry, but that makes no sense to me. I'd wager if similar bugs showed up in another game by a different company many of you would be complaining to no end. Calling the game crappy and the developer lazy or unskilled. In fact, I don't need to. I see it all the time.
RedEyesBlackGamer said:
You must not play on the PS3. I expected the game to work on a fundamental level. Instead, I got this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-ps3-skyrim-lag
Edit: I also don't understand why fans are blindly defending the game and Bethesda.
Because it only adds the the rather humorous, ironic hypocrisy when some of them turn around and start chastising Half-Life fans, Halo fans, etc on how they can possibly like such "poorly made games" and defend the people who made them.
Robert632 said:
Well, some people, believe it or not, do not like certain things, and become especially vocal about disliking things when it is shoved down their throats. Not trying to be hostile or anything, just making an observation about it.
Also this. When it becomes a chore to go to any part of this (and many other) forum(s) without seeing several threads about Skyrim or a post that alludes to it, no matter the section or topic, some people get annoyed and want to vent some of that annoyance.
Just saying.
Peteron said:
Very few bugs compared to the usual, which is outstanding seeing as how complex and vast of a game it is. People complain because they try their hardest to find things wrong with a great game.
Or maybe they have genuine complaints? Crazy, I know. And call me the same, but it seems many of these bugs being complained about aren't isolated occurrences.