exactly a lot of the PS3 glitches appear through normal play through, I shouldn't have to hard-reset my PS3 after 2-3 hours because it freezes with NO lag or warning.Arontala said:Because god forbid people get mad about game-breaking/incredibly severe bugs and engine problems.
That's just plain whinging.
Yes, it's a Bethesda game. Well, so fucking what? Why does Bethesda get this special seat of honour? Yes, they can't find all of bugs because Skyrim is a big game, but almost every major problem that people are complaining about are issues that a blind man could have stumbled upon.
When a single player game lasts me 60 hours and I haven't even touched the main quest I'm amazed.VanityGirl said:Because, when you dump 60+ hours into your mage and the game starts to lag up, then you feel robbed.
I hope you're joking. "Whining" is how s**t gets fixed. The phrase "I'm surprised it's playable at launch" basically spells out your whole post. Do you realize how stupid it sounds? It's like buying a car and being surprised that the engine runs.Virmire said:I'm curious as to why everyone is complaining about Skyrim's glitches? There not that bad, and this is a Bethesda game... I'm surprised it was playable at launch. It's a fantastic game, and I don't know why so many people are taking the piss out of it because of a few bugs here and there, and in a game as massive as this, it would be unusual if there weren't a few coding hicups here and there.
Oh please... People are hating on it because it is literally broken. On the PS3 anyway, I can't speak for the other versions.Jovip said:because it's popular, people will hate on it to seem edgy or something stupid like that
This too, in a nutshell this is my Skyrim experience:Gaiseric said:I was having a good time then the frames started dropping until it was like an interactive slideshow.
Where have I made any excuses for Bethesda's games? They don't need excuses...they're awesome. If a few little bugs get you all bent out of shape...don't play it. They've sold enough copies of the game and will continue to do so in the future.RedEyesBlackGamer said:They released a game on the PS3 that was broken. It essentially imposed a time limit on one save file. I'm sorry that you feel the need to make excuses for them. And what is hypocritical about Pinkie Pie?DRes82 said:Blindly? I assure, I see Skyrim quite clearly and what I see is a masterpiece of gaming.RedEyesBlackGamer said:You must not play on the PS3. I expected the game to work on a fundamental level. Instead, I got this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-ps3-skyrim-lag
Edit: I also don't understand why fans are blindly defending the game and Bethesda.
As for Bethesda? I also have clearly within my gaze Arena, Daggerfall, Morrowind, Oblivion, and Fallout 3.
I don't know why people are blindly shitting on a game and a developer that are so obviously great.
edit: I just noticed your avatar, which renders your post extremely hypocritical in my opinion.
I'm back, and my dragons don't 'steer with their asses'. In fact, I have yet to encounter any substantial bug.Aeonknight said:Masterpiece of gaming? Come back and say that when your dragons aren't steering with their asses. The sheer incompetance of Bethesda's Q/A is legendary throughout the industry.DRes82 said:Blindly? I assure, I see Skyrim quite clearly and what I see is a masterpiece of gaming.RedEyesBlackGamer said:You must not play on the PS3. I expected the game to work on a fundamental level. Instead, I got this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-ps3-skyrim-lag
Edit: I also don't understand why fans are blindly defending the game and Bethesda.
As for Bethesda? I also have clearly within my gaze Arena, Daggerfall, Morrowind, Oblivion, and Fallout 3.
I don't know why people are blindly shitting on a game and a developer that are so obviously great.
edit: I just noticed your avatar, which renders your post extremely hypocritical in my opinion.
aaronobst said:Oh please... People are hating on it because it is literally broken. On the PS3 anyway, I can't speak for the other versions.Jovip said:because it's popular, people will hate on it to seem edgy or something stupid like that
I've been trying every possible solution and remedy to get the game to work, at this point, I'm around 11MB and 76 hours into my game and the game is literally unplayable. I load it up then, 5 to 10 minutes into playing, the game freezes. The screen stops moving, and it won't respond to any input. I leave it going for a few minutes to see if it'll recover, but it never does. I always have to manually shut down the ps3, which means waiting for the "Checking File System" procedure to finish, which takes about 10 minutes for me. These crashes used to happen much later into playing, to the point where I could live with them, but they since made a huge jump in speed. The crashes, I should note, happen any time. Sometimes during loading screens, sometimes during dialog. It doesn't seem to matter what's happening.
So, long story short, every time I start up Skyrim, it crashes 5-10 minutes into playing. The game is literally unplayable in this state. It's not stuttering. It's not stalling. It's crashing.
It's actually quite depressing, the only game I TRULY WANTED to play this year and it fucking flopped
In other words, Bethesda has always been incompetent, so we can't hold them to the standards of an ostensibly AAA game?Peteron said:Yes, your right, that is crazy. Like I said, compared to the amount of bugs the company normally has with their games, this is nothing. It doesn't take away from gameplay in most cases, and makes the game a little bit funnier. I find that many people on this site try to find everything wrong with a game that they can. Why can't people just leave it as whether they liked it or not?
Sure:DRes82 said:On what planet is Bethesda's QA 'legendary for its incompetance'? Want to back that statement up with sources?
I have it on PS3 and it's not too bad, it must vary, ok there's some lag here and there but nothing too bad, also I didn't update that patch so no backwards dragons for me, and I'm not going to update until everyone else has the next patch to see how much more/less playable it makes the gameRedEyesBlackGamer said:You must not play on the PS3. I expected the game to work on a fundamental level. Instead, I got this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-ps3-skyrim-lag
Edit: I also don't understand why fans are blindly defending the game and Bethesda.
What they show there is actually quite mild compared to what I sometimes experience. At least they could get from Riverwood to Whiterun without a fatal crash...RedEyesBlackGamer said:You must not play on the PS3. I expected the game to work on a fundamental level. Instead, I got this:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-ps3-skyrim-lag
Here is unofficial skyrim buglist, it is unbelievable.DRes82 said:I'm back, and my dragons don't 'steer with their asses'. In fact, I have yet to encounter any substantial bug.
On what planet is Bethesda's QA 'legendary for its incompetance'? Want to back that statement up with sources?
It wasn't playable to me until this morning when I found a fan made patch.Virmire said:I'm curious as to why everyone is complaining about Skyrim's glitches? There not that bad, and this is a Bethesda game... I'm surprised it was playable at launch. .