Saltyk said:
Do you really thinking not allowing a person to go through puberty is not going to have side effects?
The only effect being, if taken off and having to go through normal puberty, starting puberty later usually in that mid-teens area. But it's used to decrease a trans kid's dysphoric feelings which ramp during puberty. And it would be kind of screwed up not giving a child who's been having X amount of years with dysphoria something that is reversible and has no present negative effects to go through the puberty of the sex they don't want to be.
I find that hard to believe.
I find a lot of things hard to believe, doesn't mean they aren't true.
And I'd be the happiest to hear the negatives because I don't see any foreseeable negative would trump the biggest negative of having to experience the puberty of the sex you don't want to be.
You're assuming they are transgender.
Me? Assuming trans people saying they're transgender are actually...*gasp* transgender? I would never!
Why can't they just simply be confused?
I was, but that's why trans people have to get approved for much of their transitioning treatments as to be the right path for them to go. It's almost like transitioning is a long and arduous process for people to undergo until they think they're satisfied with themselves. Shocking I know.
Or tomboys? [whatever is the opposite of tomboy]?
What about them? Because this isn't a pseudo-Iran where effeminate men and masculine women are forced to undergo transitioning. A gender non-conforming person, child or otherwise, doesn't even make me bat my eye anymore. I've seen 8 year old boys in dresses and pink shoes in malls buying videogames and couldn't care less. Now if I were their parent or someone who knew/cared for them and they said stuff like "I'd like if you call me she from now on" or "I don't like my penis". Then yeah, nearest gender clinic to see what's up. That's also the tipping point for most parents of trans kids, anything before that is usually interpreted by parents as a phase or early signs of homosexuality.
And even if they are transgender why is transitioning literally the only viable option?
Because the only comparable option to transitioning a trans person to their desired body (whatever that might entail based upon their individual experience) would be literally lobotomizing them to accept their body. Something I'm pretty sure we can't do at this time and if we could get it right, we'd get it wrong far more.
assuming there is only one treatment is rather ignorant.
Assuming "transitioning" is one treatment is rather ignorant.
We should consider counseling and medication as alternative treatments.
Ah counseling, the thing trans people have both before and after transition. Unless you're talking about counseling closer to deconversion therapy, in which case, no we don't really need that. And medication? Do you mean like spironolactone and estradiol?
Considering that the suicide rate doesn't go down whether a transgender person transitions or not,
If you're talking about that Swedish study from 2011, save it. Comparing trans people suicide rates to a cis control group doesn't mean that transition isn't effective, just as comparing people with cancer receiving a drug to a normal healthy control group of people who doesn't say the drug is 100% ineffectual because the cancer patients were more likely to die. And there's also this: http://www.torontosun.com/2015/06/08/suicide-rate-much-higher-for-transgender-canadians-study
"-- The support of parents mattered greatly even when a transgender person was well into adulthood.
-- The risk of suicidal thoughts dropped 44% among trans Ontarians who could get legal forms such as birth certificates or OHIP cards with their new gender.
-- Those who experienced low levels of trans-based hate were 66% less likely to consider suicide that those who endured high levels through things such as abuse.
--
There was a link between suicide and how far along a trans person was in changing their body to the desired state -- the closer to completion, the fewer attempted suicides."
So what I learn from that is, supporting transitioning is important, having avenues for transition is important, and transition itself was important.
it certainly couldn't hurt.
Depends on what you mean. Namely that deconversion therapy thing.
Might save a few lives if we have multiple tools to treat these people rather than just a hammer. You know what every problem looks like when you only have a hammer, right?
Transitioning isn't just one fucking tool though. It's something that encompasses various social/legal/physical/mental changes unique to a person's experience. Not everybody needs sexual reassignment surgery, nor hormone replacement surgery.
Are you really suggesting that children can make decisions that will affect the rest of their lives?
...no. Unless you think puberty blockers affects a person for the rest of their life (it won't ) and being called Jessica vs. Johnie will do the same. Because that is literally what trans kids do. If they're right before puberty, put 'em on blockers if they want/need 'em, otherwise everything else is their gender expression as well as gender affirmation by parents, peers and institutions. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing that isn't reversible.
So I guess you work as an astronaut, doctor, or fireman.
I kind of work as all three actually.
Since most children say they want to be one of those things when they grow up.
I fucking love that this is your response to me essentially saying "hey, you know you're not an expert on trans people, so maybe stop trying to say what is and isn't their business doing?". Because "transitioning" isn't changing genitals, or taking estrogen for the first time, it can be as little as being recognized as the opposite sex in a legal and social manner, which these trans kids can do. And guess what? If they decide they don't like it, they can go back.
When did I say that transgender kids don't exist? When did I say that transgender people don't exist? When did I suggest a problem with transgender people in general?
When did I accuse you of any of this? Because me pointing out "hey, the things you apparently want for trans kids are already common practice" isn't really me accusing you of anything. Because those things you detail you want, yeah, common practice. You literally had nothing to be outraged over in terms of trans kids transitioning because they don't go through SRS or HRT.
But you interpret that they did and me supporting their transition means I want them to undergo either SRS or HRT as children because...