Why? Because you say they aren't? Well I say they are. And unlike you I'm going to justify my opinion. I can, because I have arguments.TorqueConverter said:It's not fair to compare a PC to a console. It's impossible to determine which system is superior as two platforms are not even remotely suited for comparison.
Once again we have a case of someone who doesn't know what a comparison is. It seems that people only want to compare two things if they are completely the same. There is no reason to compare same things. The differences between things is the reason for their comparison. That's the whole point of comparing things. And these two can definitely be compared. Combine their hardware similarities with their primary purpose and you have a perfect reason to compare them.TorqueConverter said:In order for one platform to superior to the other, there must be a comparison between the two. How else could one come to the conclusion that one platform is superior to the other? The comparison is invalid therefore neither system is superior. There isn't even a baseline for "the PC" to even form the beginnings of a comparison.
Why would you need to upgrade... your PC each time. If it's made for the console too then you shouldn't need to upgrade it. The console hasn't been upgraded for a while. Most the PC exclusives don't seem that graphic intense... and even then, you can turn the graphics down.dreadedcandiru99 said:A few people have probably beaten me to the punch on these, but since you asked:Strain42 said:If you don't play PC games, why?
(1) Because playing a game with an input device originally designed for typing letters rather than game-playing has always been clumsy and awkward, at least to me, and
(2) Because I can't afford to buy a load of new computer parts every time a new game comes out.
That second thing, in particular, is by far the biggest reason I've stuck with consoles: all I have to do is turn them on, put the disk in, and play. I guess I'll have to find a way to afford more PC games, though, if some of the crap I've heard about the next-gen consoles turns out to be true...
Common sense is why.Adam Jensen said:Why? Because you say they aren't? Well I say they are. And unlike you I'm going to justify my opinion. I can, because I have arguments.
That a very weak argument. To say a game console and gaming PC are used for the same purpose and therefore comparable is to say a Mustang GT and Ferrari 458 are used for same purposes and as a result, are comparable automobiles. Mustang has wheels and an engine right?You use consoles for the same purpose you use a gaming PC. Consoles run on similar hardware, they have CPU, GPU, RAM and HDD. Consoles use controllers that PCs can use. You hook up a console to a TV. Again, you can do that on PC. So what is stopping you from comparing the two? The fact that consoles aren't PC's and PC's aren't consoles? You can't be serious.
A comparison between an Xbox 360 and PS3 would be valid. I believe you fail to understand the the purpose of comparing two things. You don't do it for shits and giggles or to stroke your ego.Once again we have a case of someone who doesn't know what a comparison is. It seems that people only want to compare two things if they are completely the same. There is no reason to compare same things. The differences between things is the reason for their comparison. That's the whole point of comparing things. And these two can definitely be compared. Combine their hardware similarities with their primary purpose and you have a perfect reason to compare them.
You don't compare apples to oranges. Have you not heard this before? There is a reason why game consoles have not replaced the gaming PC or vice versa. They can't. The two platforms are not similar enough to do so. You don't compare two things that are not comparable. To do so would be asinine.I want a direct answer. Why do you think the comparison is invalid? What argument do you have to support that claim? Because for some reason you failed to mention the actual reason why the comparison is invalid. You just said it is without justifying your own opinion.
1. Then pay 500 dollars for a pretty decent oneHunter65416 said:-Dont wanna spend a grand on a high end one
-Dont really have the know-how to build one
-I like to kick my legs up and be able to relax on a couch - and to the people saying you can do that with a pc, I say.. No, You cant,because you'd have to sit in a pretty tedious position to be able to use a mouse and keyboard..and to those about to say you can use a joypad on pc..no, most of the time you cant do that either..
-In the past 10 years ive gone through about 4 pcs, They all had up to date virus protection and all that crap, Ive only ever had one xbox which I got in 2005 and its given me hundreds upon hundreds of hastle-free entertainment since.
In conclusion im lazy and I just want to play games and not bother with keeping specs upto date,Compatability,Crappy Console to PC ports,Framerate,DRM and all that stuff just for better graphics..and mods, gota give credit for those
Not an argument.TorqueConverter said:Common sense is why.
Even if it is a weak argument (and it isn't) it's still better than no argument.TorqueConverter said:That a very weak argument. To say a game console and gaming PC are used for the same purpose and therefore comparable is to say a Mustang GT and Ferrari 458 are used for same purposes and as a result, are comparable automobiles. Mustang has wheels and an engine right?
It's only your opinion that they aren't comparable. And you provided no argument for it whatsoever.TorqueConverter said:You don't suggest we compare two things that are not comparable, do you? For real?
It doesn't matter. But the most logical way would be to start from a PC that can play all the games a console can play at least on the same amount of graphical details. But you can compare a high end PC with a console if you're going to compare them from a hardware point of view.TorqueConverter said:Also, what baseline for "gaming PC" are we going to use here? Low end, mid range or high end hardware?
Just because you think you can't recommend someone a PC or a console over the other system doesn't mean anyone else can't. I can. It depends on what that person wants from a system, what kind of games that person plays etc. You can definitely recommend one over the other.TorqueConverter said:For "gaming PC" and a game console to be comparable one must be able to recommend once system over the other. Can you honestly tell someone looking to purchase an Xbox 360 to get a gaming PC instead? What about someone looking into buying a high end gaming PC? Are you going to tell them to get a console?
Where did you come up with that conclusion? You seen to be drawing conclusions out of thin air. Do you have a valid argument or not?TorqueConverter said:A comparison between an Xbox 360 and PS3 would be valid. I believe you fail to understand the the purpose of comparing two things. You don't do it for shits and giggles or to stroke your ego.
And how do you know this? That no one is going to do that? Where is your data? Again, your assertions are baseless. That way you can argue that no one is going to be persuaded to purchase Xbox 360 over the PS3. Same logic, no data, no arguments.TorqueConverter said:You compare two similar items so as to come to the conclusion of which item is superior or is closest to your preferences. No one looking at dropping over $1000 on a gaming PC is going to be persuaded to purchase a Xbox 360 instead. No one looking at purchasing a PS3 is going to be persuaded to purchase a $1000+ high end gaming rig over the PS3.
So because people are ignorant (according to you), two items can't be compared. Right. And yet again you're pulling stuff out of thin air. You can't simply say "only this and only that" without providing evidence for such claims, and then expect to be taken seriously.TorqueConverter said:Only an ill informed consumer unaware to the existence of gaming PCs until someone slapped them over the head with one, will turn away from purchasing a game console in favor of a gaming PC. "Oh those things exist? Wow, why was I looking at this PS3 then? This is exactly what I want!"
Well actually you can compare apples with oranges. They're both fruit for one. You just need to pick the right criteria to compare them. And yes, PC's and consoles are similar. Your argument is that consoles didn't replace gaming PC. Fine, PS3 didn't replace Xbox 360. According to our logic those two can't be compared.TorqueConverter said:You don't compare apples to oranges. Have you not heard this before? There is a reason why game consoles have not replaced the gaming PC or vice versa. They can't. The two platforms are not similar enough to do so. You don't compare two things that are not comparable. To do so would be asinine.
From what I've heard it's quite likely that the next gen of consoles will have systems in place at least as bad as on PC currently (using a built in mobile broadband thing to a security server - if you haven't registered the game as proof of purchase, or aren't old enough to play it you'll be blocked from playing the game.)Mikeyfell said:2 reasons.
1) My PC is old so I can't run any games worth playing
2) FUCKING DRM!
Console for life!
Yeah I love waiting five minutes to turn around, too.museofdoom said:I only play a handful of PC games. Like The Sims, Civilization, Roller Coaster Tycoon, or point and click puzzle games like Myst or Uru. I never play shooters on the computer because I find the controls to be really awkward and I always hit wrong buttons. Console controls just make a lot more sense to me.
Okay, correction.drednoahl said:From what I've heard it's quite likely that the next gen of consoles will have systems in place at least as bad as on PC currently (using a built in mobile broadband thing to a security server - if you haven't registered the game as proof of purchase, or aren't old enough to play it you'll be blocked from playing the game.)Mikeyfell said:2 reasons.
1) My PC is old so I can't run any games worth playing
2) FUCKING DRM!
Console for life!