Why Homosexuality Should be Banned

[tjcross]

for the first little bit i thought the guy was serious then when he hit religion i figured out he was joking and i lol'd

 

[Mr. 47]

I was getting my rage-face on when I saw this topic.

I am 100% for gay marrage. The only way I could me more for it, would be if I wanted to be married to a same sex partner. There are few views that I would call idiotic, one would be to be against gay marriage. Love is love, marriage is marriage, this will not alter society, it will only make people happy, and anyone who thinks otherwise must know a great deal about lower bowel anatomy as they have their head stuck up their ass!

 

[Cakes]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

As opposed to the genius arguments of real "anti-homosexual" (?) people.

 

[UltraXan]

He's trolling, right? He's not serious? Because if he is, then he deserves to die in a fire, because I've just been bombarded with religious, racist bullshit. Seriously, I did not find that funny, and I'm not even gay!

No, he's not trolling at all, how could you even get that idea? [/sarcasm]

OF COURSE HE'S FUCKING TROLLING!!!

How could you possibly listen to him, and think that he isn't trolling?

I find it quite funny how you have troll face avatar, very suitable.

At any rate, I'll respond to that by saying that there are people in the world who are that fucking retarded. Take the Taliban, for example! In America, women have equal rights! Not over there, though! No siree, the Taliban don't give a fuck about women because they are "inferior".

 

[Raskolnikov34]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

As opposed to the genius arguments of real "anti-homosexual" (?) people.

no, I'm referencing things like "banning oatmeal and single parents, or the infertile, or old".

He's propping up arguments without articulating their points either, I could do the same for advocates of gay marriage.

And yes, I understand this video is semi-trollish, its just that some people take the video and respond by saying "yup, that's exactly what anti-gay marriage advocates think!".

 

[tjcross]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

i do not wish to flame you but may i ask why you are anti-homosexual is it because it is not normal or is it fear or is it just that you don't understand it or is it something else for the first no on is "normal" we all have quirks that make us weird (mine include saying BING BONG when i enter my house and eating block cheese with mayo spread on it or saying eh as a type of question mark... yes i'm Canadian) for the second well not much i can say there for the last i can understand it's weird and you have no connection it's like trying to describe colors to a person who has been blind since birth but honestly i'd like to hear why from an anti-homo who actually has manners (and just so you know i'm am straight so you don't need to talk about it in your response if you choose to respond) also if you say it's because it's unnatural well so is a computer and cars and all the other appliances we use on a daily basis and the unnatural claim is the only one i find complete crap (religion is protected cause hey hard to argue with someone you can't talk to aka god)

 

[Canid117]

The video I found quite humourous. Although I can't see posting it as anything else other than trollbait as it is rather... obnoxious at the same time. Some people will be too dumb to take it how its supposed to be taken and will see it as an attack against homosexuality.

Plus there is the fact its your very first post.

I dunno. My avatar is a rainbow, my name has rainbow in it and the video is supremely sarcastic. You really think it'll go over anyone's head? You think too little of your Escapst brothers and sisters!

Alas the red button prevents me from seeing your avatar right now. Good video though.

 

[Raskolnikov34]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

i do not wish to flame you but may i ask why you are anti-homosexual is it because it is not normal or is it fear or is it just that you don't understand it or is it something else for the first no on is "normal" we all have quirks that make us weird (mine include saying BING BONG when i enter my house and eating block cheese with mayo spread on it or saying eh as a type of question mark... yes i'm Canadian) for the second well not much i can say there for the last i can understand it's weird and you have no connection it's like trying to describe colors to a person who has been blind since birth but honestly i'd like to hear why from an anti-homo who actually has manners (and just so you know i'm am straight so you don't need to talk about it in your response if you choose to respond) also if you say it's because it's unnatural well so is a computer and cars and all the other appliances we use on a daily basis and the unnatural claim is the only one i find complete crap (religion is protected cause hey hard to argue with someone you can't talk to aka god)

Why am I anti-gay marriage?

Because its not conductive to a happy, functioning society. It would completely destroy the institution of marriage (something already suffering from the amount of divorces). Gay marriages are almost always unhealthy, they leave the children involved in particular without proper role models, and leads to unhappiness for them later on. And, yes, homosexual is completely unnatural, and is (warning: this may be offensive) frankly immoral, hedonistic behavior. From a biological, ethical, and psychological perspective, it is unnatural behavior that should not accepted by society.


And no, I don't hate or fear homosexuals, I don't support any sort of violence against them. And don't take this as a hate speech, I'm open to debate and seeing your points of view as well.


Here's a website that has some points for and against it (and no, I don't agree with their point about religions): http://www.balancedpolitics.org/same_sex_marriages.htm

 

[mega48man]

lol, that's actually pretty funny. at first, i thought he was gonna go on a serious rant, but the more he got into it is when i realized he's showing the true nonsense of anti-gay statements. it's brilliant, if this guy really is supporting homosexuality through ironic "in your face" comments, i fully support him. some one show this video to westboro, i'd laugh too hard if they agree with everything he says without stopping to think about what he says.

 

[ShadowsofHope]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

i do not wish to flame you but may i ask why you are anti-homosexual is it because it is not normal or is it fear or is it just that you don't understand it or is it something else for the first no on is "normal" we all have quirks that make us weird (mine include saying BING BONG when i enter my house and eating block cheese with mayo spread on it or saying eh as a type of question mark... yes i'm Canadian) for the second well not much i can say there for the last i can understand it's weird and you have no connection it's like trying to describe colors to a person who has been blind since birth but honestly i'd like to hear why from an anti-homo who actually has manners (and just so you know i'm am straight so you don't need to talk about it in your response if you choose to respond) also if you say it's because it's unnatural well so is a computer and cars and all the other appliances we use on a daily basis and the unnatural claim is the only one i find complete crap (religion is protected cause hey hard to argue with someone you can't talk to aka god)

Why am I anti-gay marriage?

Because its not conductive to a happy, functioning society. It would completely destroy the institution of marriage (something already suffering from the amount of divorces). Gay marriages are almost always unhealthy, they leave the children involved in particular without proper role models, and leads to unhappiness for them later on. And, yes, homosexual is completely unnatural, and is (warning: this may be offensive) frankly immoral, hedonistic behavior. From a biological, ethical, and psychological perspective, it is unnatural behavior that should not accepted by society.

[CITATION(S) NEEDED]

That is all I will say in remark to this post, for now.

Edit: Also, number one in "Yes" and number one in "No" are inherently contradictory. If a law cannot be established that would make taking the God of the Christian's name in vain under a Secular government due to a separation of the Church and State even if the majority of people are Christian, then how does a law based equally from the same religion banning Gay Marriage due to belief pass under the same circumstances? Are they not both equally "offensive" to Christians?

 

[chiefohara]

Why do people care?

Seriously, if you are not gay then why give a damn about what gay people do?

I'd be more concerned about the effects of drugs or alcohol on the modern christian family than bloody homosexuality. Why not campaign and rant productively against that instead of championing this hypocritical morality crap against gays.

 

[Baneat]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

As opposed to the genius arguments of real "anti-homosexual" (?) people.

no, I'm referencing things like "banning oatmeal and single parents, or the infertile, or old".

He's propping up arguments without articulating their points either, I could do the same for advocates of gay marriage.

And yes, I understand this video is semi-trollish, its just that some people take the video and respond by saying "yup, that's exactly what anti-gay marriage advocates think!".

There's no refutal to the argument that you've offered, you've just vaguely hinted that his analogical arguments do not ring true without attacking the principles which are transferrable.

Try again, slow down, and refute all of his points.

And offer any of your own that he hasn't considered,

Really, I'd love to hear them (Not trolling) because I've heard every single one of those cited and they can all be soundly countered.

 

[Raskolnikov34]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

As opposed to the genius arguments of real "anti-homosexual" (?) people.

no, I'm referencing things like "banning oatmeal and single parents, or the infertile, or old".

He's propping up arguments without articulating their points either, I could do the same for advocates of gay marriage.

And yes, I understand this video is semi-trollish, its just that some people take the video and respond by saying "yup, that's exactly what anti-gay marriage advocates think!".

There's no refutal to the argument that you've offered, you've just vaguely hinted that his analogical arguments do not ring true without attacking the principles which are transferrable.

Try again, slow down, and refute all of his points.

And offer any of your own that he hasn't considered,

Really, I'd love to hear them (Not trolling) because I've heard every single one of those cited and they can all be soundly countered.

I already made a couple posts giving other people this....

 

[mega48man]

Homosexuality is quite common in the natural world in many other species, why should humanity be any different?

Because we're talking about gay rights here, so animals have nothing to do in this discussion. That's like saying: It's unnatural for the human being to fly. And then someone comes up with: "But, birds...".

in what sense, then, can you say that homosexuality is unnatural? you seem to be appealing to a purely subjective standard of human nature.

he's not. he's telling vault girl that animals have nothing to do with the topic. i think a better way to show the absurdity of the comment is to say there aren't any racoons in the wild dressing like you ain't never seen elton john or lady gaga.

point is there are already animal right laws: don't abuse them. but they're aren't gay right laws (or at least there aren't in select states) so we need to get westboro to die in a hole, or all old people from kansas.

 

[ShadowsofHope]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

As opposed to the genius arguments of real "anti-homosexual" (?) people.

no, I'm referencing things like "banning oatmeal and single parents, or the infertile, or old".

He's propping up arguments without articulating their points either, I could do the same for advocates of gay marriage.

And yes, I understand this video is semi-trollish, its just that some people take the video and respond by saying "yup, that's exactly what anti-gay marriage advocates think!".

There's no refutal to the argument that you've offered, you've just vaguely hinted that his analogical arguments do not ring true without attacking the principles which are transferrable.

Try again, slow down, and refute all of his points.

And offer any of your own that he hasn't considered,

Really, I'd love to hear them (Not trolling) because I've heard every single one of those cited and they can all be soundly countered.

Read the post I've responded to from him, it about sums up his (fallacious and rather hypocritical) viewpoints already.

 

[DanielDeFig]

XD! Never seen this before. It's nice to see all the arguments most commonly used against homosexuality are all brought into the light of logic and reason, to show them for what they really are: illogical, unreasonable and simply wrong.

Who says sarcasm is the lowest from of comedy? In my opinions, it's one of the highest forms of comedy (with forced puns as the lowest of the low. Grrr! American kids cartoons that I watched too much, only to grow up and realize how many bad puns there were).

I smiled a bit inside when watching this video. Which is nice, cause now I'll be going to bed happy.

 

[Baneat]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

As opposed to the genius arguments of real "anti-homosexual" (?) people.

no, I'm referencing things like "banning oatmeal and single parents, or the infertile, or old".

He's propping up arguments without articulating their points either, I could do the same for advocates of gay marriage.

And yes, I understand this video is semi-trollish, its just that some people take the video and respond by saying "yup, that's exactly what anti-gay marriage advocates think!".

There's no refutal to the argument that you've offered, you've just vaguely hinted that his analogical arguments do not ring true without attacking the principles which are transferrable.

Try again, slow down, and refute all of his points.

And offer any of your own that he hasn't considered,

Really, I'd love to hear them (Not trolling) because I've heard every single one of those cited and they can all be soundly countered.

Read the post I've responded to from him, it about sums up his (fallacious and rather hypocritical) viewpoints already.

Yes, the points placed have been nulled a priori (Without subjective observed evidence), so I'll need more.

 

[Anchupom]

Heh... I was sat there thinking this was a troll thread until I read OP. (Always read the entire comment before watching videos. It helps you prepare for whatever it is.)

Then I watched the video and laughed, it makes good points, though I think it went a bit off the rails at the end when the subtlety tapdanced out of the room.

 

[ShadowsofHope]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

As opposed to the genius arguments of real "anti-homosexual" (?) people.

no, I'm referencing things like "banning oatmeal and single parents, or the infertile, or old".

He's propping up arguments without articulating their points either, I could do the same for advocates of gay marriage.

And yes, I understand this video is semi-trollish, its just that some people take the video and respond by saying "yup, that's exactly what anti-gay marriage advocates think!".

There's no refutal to the argument that you've offered, you've just vaguely hinted that his analogical arguments do not ring true without attacking the principles which are transferrable.

Try again, slow down, and refute all of his points.

And offer any of your own that he hasn't considered,

Really, I'd love to hear them (Not trolling) because I've heard every single one of those cited and they can all be soundly countered.

Read the post I've responded to from him, it about sums up his (fallacious and rather hypocritical) viewpoints already.

Yes, the points placed have been nulled a priori (Without subjective observed evidence), so I'll need more.

Then I guess we'll be waiting forever for more, as usual. It's either fundamental Christian blogs and quoted Biblical verses, or.. "It's my belief, respect it just.. well, because!". At least, in terms of this specific topic.

 

[tjcross]

Ugh, this video is obnoxious...

I'm anti-homosexual (don't flame me), and I hate the way he basically makes up supposed arguments of anti-homosexual people.

i do not wish to flame you but may i ask why you are anti-homosexual is it because it is not normal or is it fear or is it just that you don't understand it or is it something else for the first no on is "normal" we all have quirks that make us weird (mine include saying BING BONG when i enter my house and eating block cheese with mayo spread on it or saying eh as a type of question mark... yes i'm Canadian) for the second well not much i can say there for the last i can understand it's weird and you have no connection it's like trying to describe colors to a person who has been blind since birth but honestly i'd like to hear why from an anti-homo who actually has manners (and just so you know i'm am straight so you don't need to talk about it in your response if you choose to respond) also if you say it's because it's unnatural well so is a computer and cars and all the other appliances we use on a daily basis and the unnatural claim is the only one i find complete crap (religion is protected cause hey hard to argue with someone you can't talk to aka god)

Why am I anti-gay marriage?

Because its not conductive to a happy, functioning society. It would completely destroy the institution of marriage (something already suffering from the amount of divorces). Gay marriages are almost always unhealthy, they leave the children involved in particular without proper role models, and leads to unhappiness for them later on. And, yes, homosexual is completely unnatural, and is (warning: this may be offensive) frankly immoral, hedonistic behavior. From a biological, ethical, and psychological perspective, it is unnatural behavior that should not accepted by society.


And no, I don't hate or fear homosexuals, I don't support any sort of violence against them. And don't take this as a hate speech, I'm open to debate and seeing your points of view as well.


Here's a website that has some points for and against it (and no, I don't agree with their point about religions): http://www.balancedpolitics.org/same_sex_marriages.htm

i will admit that i do not know much about an actual gay person and will agree that they should not adopt (i mean if it's hell for a gay kid to grow up with straight parents it would be the same for a straight kid with gay parents especially if the parents were a different gender than the child) i believe they should be allowed to marry the reason i support them is because my belief is that a gay person merely has some "wires" in their brain mixed up (same as how some people have a foot fetish) and due to that i label it more under a mental condition that only changes how the subject lusts for someone and since it doesn't effect society in the big picture other than it being odd i don't see a reason to stand against it nor do i find it immoral because well my morals are just be a good person and don't really have anything to do with sexuality (except some of the more horrible aspects such as rape torture ect) and i will admit that by my morals being anti-homo is not immoral either as long as the person doesn't participate in hate crimes i am just trying to understand it.

also i only read the beginning of the link (the bullet points) but i think the slipping of who can marry who is a bit much i will admit some people will say things like that (the multiple wives/husbands scenario is likely and i will admit could be dangerous, the incestuous marriage has been proven to have a highly increased chance of a disabled child) but the marriage of animals is highly unlikely (or at least highly unlikely to be taken seriously as an animal is an entirely different species.
finally i would like to thank you for being civil i have tried to talk to other anti-homo marriage people before and all i got were stereotypical white trash teenagers or preachers (then again you have probably had you fair share of politically correct drones attacking you) good to see someone can talk intelligently about it.