Fixed.jamesworkshop said:hardly surprising considering how much the current Wii is smacking all competition around
Fixed.jamesworkshop said:hardly surprising considering how much the current Wii is smacking all competition around
The Wii's niche that you mentioned is starting to close up a bit more. Games for the thing worth trying out are starting to grow, so give it maybe... a year, and hopefully that niche will change a bit.Aries_Split said:Well, this whole argument, it's retarded.
Cause like, the Wii and the PS3 fill different Niches.
The Niche of the Wii is to be good with kids and old people.
The ps3 is for people who want something a little more mature.
just cause somethings HD doesn't mean its more or less accessible or hardcore though i hate using that term.
Increasing the performance of the Wii would mean it would cost more to make, therefor not making it as cost effective.Indigo_Dingo said:Since when does one denote the other?
This. The audience the Wii is marketed to the most, are the people that aren't that interested in super-HD video games.tenlong said:If i wanted a hd game system i play a 360 or ps3. I play the wii for games that only the wii can do . I don't play the wii for state of the art graphics. On side note has this guy ever been right?
Or even better, don't make up fairy tales at all.Programmed_For_Damage said:I think he needs to keep rubbing his crystal balls.
Of course, there are plenty of well-made third-party games such as Klonoa, Boom Blox, Boom Blox Bash Party, Marble Saga Kororinpa, The Conduit, De Blob, Dokapon Kingdom, Elebits, Geometry Wars Galaxies, Zack and Wiki, Guilty Gear ^ Core, The Munchables, No More Heroes, Okami, Pro Evolution Soccer 2009, Puzzle Quest, Rayman Raving Rabbids, Resident Evil Umbrella Chronicles, Sonic and The Black Knight, Tales of Symphonia Dawn of the New World, Trauma Center Second Opinion and Trauma Center New Blood. The problem is that no one wants to go looking for a good game.FloodOne said:Well.... Nintendo hasn't had solid 3rd party support since 1994, when the SNES was king. Even though there are 50 million Wiis sold, how many well-made, universally praised 3rd party titles are out on it?
Madworld
Resident Evil 4
I'm at a loss to name anything else. And Madworld and RE4 didn't even sell shit for copies.
Nintendo has been drifting, doing their own thing for almost 15 years now, as far as consoles are concerned. They just managed to hit the magic bag this time out. We'll see if their next console can recapture the magic, or will all of the casual buyers/owners just keep their Wii and call it a day?
Hahahaha....m_jim said:Okay, you I'll give you that point. I think we are dancing around the wrong issue, though. What would be the true advantage of a High Definition Wii? The video output is limited by the horsepower of the system, which comes nowhere close to the PS3/X360. Twilight Princess and Okami both looked good, but for entirely different reasons than the new God of War, for example. For them, artistic direction, not visual fidelity, was the key. Trying to compete with two machines that outperform it, technologically, is a totally different problem.ChromeAlchemist said:MoH H2 was released in 07 I believe, possibly 08. The controls were fairly customiseable, and the aiming was pretty much spot on. RS2 fair enough. Call of Duty 5 came out on the Wii, and Modern Warfare 2 is rumoured, and is possible considering that a modified CoD engine exists for the Wii thanks to CoD 5. It can and will get it's share of multiplat games, it seems.
What I always see on adverts is that, but what I always hear from Nintendo is that they want EVERYONE to play their console, not just families, everyone. I believe it is family friendly in the sense that it caters to that section of gamers as well, not that it doesn't have 'any of those nasty murder simulators' like the others. I doubt they would tune out because of a section of games, if that were the case then Natal will die on it's back (and I don't think it will).
And oh yes, all in good fun ;¬)
If Nintendo wanted to fully exploit an HD machine, they would have to increase the power of their machine, yes? Then, they would have the twofold problem of 1) building hi-res games that wouldn't run on old Wii's and 2) trying to get early adopters to upgrade to a new system. I think that if Nintendo tried to break into the HD market, it would be more trouble than it is worth.
And just like that, our debate ends? It has been interesting. ;¬)ChromeAlchemist said:What website did you think you were on? Most will disagree, followed by some kind of Wii bashing.Pendragon9 said:Yep. And now this entire thread will be filled with "omg this guy is totally right! I feel bad for doubting him! Sony sux!!!11!1"
If someone makes such a post, just know I called it.
As for myself, people have been telling me how the benefits of a HD compatible Wii is axiomatic, but I still don't understand. A handful of games would truly look better on the Wii would they not? Surely a higher definition would mean that it would point out the shortcomings visually also? If a lot of developers put half assed work in Surely a higher output would make games look worse.
Perhaps someone should fill me in before I continue, am I not right?
Also the lower porting cost is interesting, it makes his claims hold some kind of weight. But I don't think there will be such an upgrade of a console. The Wii doesn't look like a console designed to last a decade in my eyes.
I think his job is probably in danger, so he just keeps spouting nonsense till people are satisfied (or tired). But PSP Go! was his personal opinion, and he seems to believe he isn't allowed such a thing.Jumplion said:Patcher, for god's sake, make up your mind!
First you say the PSP Go! is a ripoff, then you say you didn't mean it that way, then you say the PS3 will make a comeback sometime in the near future then you say "nope, Nintendo will stop that!" or something.
Make up your damn mind! Is the PS3 going to make a comeback or isn't it? Not that it matters what an analyst thinks, I just like consistency.