I guess ignoring the moral implications (not that they are to be ignored, but just for my argument), this is a pretty fair point. Other countries send money to gold farmers, gold farmers use money to buy food etc, the people selling food use said money to buy other products from retailers within the country etc etc. Assuming the money stays in the country, it does stimulate the economy really effectively. Otherwise, not great.
Basically, if the money is distributed appropriately it helps the country. Of course there is then the issue of underpaid workers, but this can kind of be helped with improved regulation etc.
In summary, its a good starting point, and then the country has to act responsibly to make sure the living standards also rise
Basically, if the money is distributed appropriately it helps the country. Of course there is then the issue of underpaid workers, but this can kind of be helped with improved regulation etc.
In summary, its a good starting point, and then the country has to act responsibly to make sure the living standards also rise