It varies greatly person to person, I've known hardcore people with full bonus exp gear do it in like a week by playing a lot of hours. But then there are people who only play say like 2-3 hours a day and it can take them a month or more.Evil Smurf said:how long does it take to normally get to level 80?
Hrm. What lie do you mean?rapidoud said:SWTOR lied to our faces,
...were originally planned for The Burning Crusade but got shelved for a future expansion. I still have yet to see anyone point out to me how humanoid pandas are any weirder than humanoid cows or humanoid wolves. Or completely energy based life forms maintained by mummy wrappings. Or blue spacegoats.VoidWanderer said:Humanoid Pandas? Check.
Just to be clear, this would be the WoW that even with the subscriber hit still has around 10 million active subscribers, right? The largest market share (by far) of any MMO?RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:WoW is in trouble,
"In trouble" as in "adjusting to a slowly declining cash flow": sure. "In trouble" as in "having a big hole in financing": no, not really.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:Blizzard will be in trouble. As shown by the major drop of subscribers and the following firing of 600 employees. They lacked the ability to keep as many workers because of a drop in subscribers while maintaining the current setups. Yeah they have DIII and SCII but warcraft is the big earner. A big CONSTANT earner. Starcraft and Diablo will only make so many sales and expansions take time. WoW was a constant income source. Blizzard as it is now and as it wants to be is in trouble.Kargathia said:WoW is indeed entering the final stages of its cycle, but for that to imply Blizzard is actually in trouble... not so much. One might do well to remember that WoW irrevocably will go down as a massive success - even if its popularity slowly starts declining, years after it was expected to kick the bucket.RT-Medic-with-shotgun said:WoW is in trouble, Blizz is taking a hit requiring 600 people to be fired to maintain current straits, and now they must be in real trouble.
Draenei were already established in the Lore of the game, and the Worgen while a new addition did make sense from their background as it fitted in quite nicely. Also the Tauren were also established in Warcraft 3. And those things, (can't remember name, and have long since stopped caring) were weird. Like the Ferengi clothes got damaged in the wash and somehow gained sentience.Amnestic said:...were originally planned for The Burning Crusade but got shelved for a future expansion. I still have yet to see anyone point out to me how humanoid pandas are any weirder than humanoid cows or humanoid wolves. Or completely energy based life forms maintained by mummy wrappings. Or blue spacegoats.VoidWanderer said:Humanoid Pandas? Check.
No, the Broken [http://www.wowpedia.org/Broken]/Lost Ones [http://www.wowpedia.org/Lost_Ones] were established in the lore. The Blue Spacegoats we saw in TBC were entirely new, and if you'd been around when they first announced it you'd have known that; you'd have seen the fan backlash. Especially since it included a retcon to their lore origins.VoidWanderer said:Draenei were already established in the Lore of the game,
I'm gonna hang on to this quote for a minute.VoidWanderer said:and the Worgen while a new addition did make sense from their background as it fitted in quite nicely.
So what you're saying is that Pandaren which had been established as a legitimate race since Frozen Throne and were mentioned in Vanilla WoW [http://www.wowpedia.org/Quest:Chen%27s_Empty_Keg] are less acceptable than Worgen which hadn't been established as a real sapient race until WotLK at the very earliest?VoidWanderer said:Pandarens... were slotted into Warcraft 3: Frozen Throne for... what reason?