Bertie Wooster said:
I don't have a good alternative, but I still don't think voting with the wallet works. It's a good theoretical idea, but most consumers seem to consume things that, at least if you ask me, are pretty awful, thus screwing it all up for everyone else.
I don't really understand however, why did you ask me the question in the first place?
Because you're complaining about a public company being "bitches" for dropping a guy before public backlash bites their shares in the ass.
It seems most gamers, at least most gamers on this site, are very "vote with your wallet" and it seemed contradictory to the gaming zeitgeist to complain that a company might be hurt for saying things which were not approved of. Then again, I hear when someone else does it it's censorship, so what do I know.
But again, I'm not sure how art comes into this, and that I think is now the larger issue. Even if you argue wrestling is art, WWE is a business with a corporate structure and WWE's executives run it as such. Well, most of the time. It's not about the art, and I don't think it's ever been, but it certainly hasn't been under Vince McMahon and company. Pro wrestling is intended as a mass consumption consumer product, so why is art even an issue?