Xbox One Games Will Still be Playable When Servers Shut Down

Adam Locking

New member
Aug 10, 2012
220
0
0
uchytjes said:
If anything, they'll make an update where they put in an option to have the Xbone work like normal, but when it isn't connected it'll require the disk be in the drive regardless of installation.
If that's the case, there must be a simple (ish) way to disable this in a console right from day one? I can see this being the mod-chip fiasco all over again...
 

vallorn

Tunnel Open, Communication Open.
Nov 18, 2009
2,309
1
43
SmokePants said:
What is this assumption that there are some servers that will be shut down when the next console launches? You can still authenticate Windows XP, despite there being a Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8. Authentication doesn't need some dedicated machines that can ONLY authenticate the Xbox One. Whatever they use to authenticate the next Xbox will be able to authenticate the Xbox One. Not to mention their transition to a flexible cloud compute architecture that uses as many virtual machines as are needed for a given task. "Shutting down servers" is an outdated concept. There is no need.
It`s a tactic they will use to shift more of their Nextbox. Basically "Oh yeah you know the last generation of consoles? We`re turning them off so if you want to stay with us you need to come and use our NEW AND IMPROVED piece of boxy rubbish!"

Its just a transparent but powerful tactic to force people to buy new products. They did it with windows XP when they released a version of Direct X that wouldn't work on it and so forced gamers who want their Direct X requiring games to "Upgrade" to a new OS like Vista or 7.

I will bet money they will eventually force us to upgrade to 8 or 9 the same way as I will also bet that they will try and push 360 users to the X1 within the next 2-3 years by shutting off those servers.
 

Soccermom

New member
Sep 10, 2012
3
0
0
LOL @ astroturfing!

Come on - try to be just a little bit subtle. Let me AT LEAST be in doubt whether this could be a genuine post.


Steven Bogos said:
Xbox One Games Will Still be Playable When Servers Shut Down

Major Nelson assured us that at the end of this generation's lifecycle, when the Xbox One's servers shut down permanently, you'll still be able to play your old games.

In an interview with /r/games [http://www.reddit.com/r/Games], Larry "Major Nelson" Hryb answered some of the most "upvoted" questions from the popular videogaming sub-reddit. Right off the bat, he was asked what would happen after the Xbox One servers are shut down at the end of the new generation. Specifically, he was asked if games would be unplayable after Microsoft pulled the plug. His response was a reassuring one: "That's certainly something we would not do. That's not the way the system is designed. It's designed for flexibility. But let's get the system out there first."

Next, Hryb was asked whether players who were banned from Xbox Live would lose access to the single player portion of all of the games they have registered to their account. "Absolutely not," Hryb replied with confidence.

"Come with us toward the light on an amazing journey, where we can unlock the potential of great gaming experiences."

Unfortunately, from this point on his replies are more deflections rather than straight answers. When asked why the Xbox One couldn't use a physical disk as a "failsafe" to bypass the 24 hour check-in policy, Hryb went on to talk about how its not possible because of how awesome the Xbox One's "family sharing library" is.

Hryb also seems unshaken by Sony's press conference, which practically devolved into mockery [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/124817-PlayStation-4-Game-Sharing-This-Is-How-Its-Done] of the Xbox One. "I don't think we're going to change anything [after having seen Sony's conference]. We're very happy with what we've done with Xbox One."

Major Nelson seemed to keep coming back to the Xbox One's "flexibility" and "future proofing" as counters to the policies being scrutinized by reddit users. He ended the interview by again bringing up how great the "family sharing library" system will be, and how he wished more people would ask him about it. If nothing else he seems to be pretty damn excited about the system.

Permalink
 

luvd1

New member
Jan 25, 2010
736
0
0
Well thanks Larry for clearing that up. It's good to see someone at MS telling it to us straight so not to cause anymore confusion about the machine then there already is..... Hang on.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Well.....at least he made it through the entire interview without insulting the consumers and/or outright telling them to not buy the product like Mattrick has a habit of doing.

On a side note: what the fuck is that on his head? o.o
 

Longstreet

New member
Jun 16, 2012
705
0
0
Too bad she didn't follow through on some questions, but just accepted the answers.

A bit better interview, although cut short / stopped sometimes by PR, is here. Part 2 also answers some other questions.

 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
I don't get it. I'm sure the next x-box after the x-bone won't be backwards compatible, so this would mean that the x-bone would retain functionality even after there are no servers for it to connect to. Meaning it can run perfectly fine without checking in every 24 hours, meaning that feature isn't integral for any sort of gameplay, meaning it only serves as a detriment to the customer.

Also, why are we still learning about how this damn thing works? We've been at this for more than two weeks, now. Why are the most basic aspects of its functionality still being revealed? Did Microsoft completely forget how to market something?
 

SmokePants

New member
Jun 28, 2010
21
0
0
vallorn said:
It`s a tactic they will use to shift more of their Nextbox. Basically "Oh yeah you know the last generation of consoles? We`re turning them off so if you want to stay with us you need to come and use our NEW AND IMPROVED piece of boxy rubbish!"

Its just a transparent but powerful tactic to force people to buy new products. They did it with windows XP when they released a version of Direct X that wouldn't work on it and so forced gamers who want their Direct X requiring games to "Upgrade" to a new OS like Vista or 7.

I will bet money they will eventually force us to upgrade to 8 or 9 the same way as I will also bet that they will try and push 360 users to the X1 within the next 2-3 years by shutting off those servers.
Your logic is putrid. You are drawing a false equivalency between an upgrade incentive like DX10 and outright disabling the previous version. Did MS turn off Windows XP authentication? Did they turn off Windows Vista authentication? Did they turn off Windows 7 authentication? No, no, and no. Why not? Aren't they Satan? Don't they want to "force" everyone into buying the next soon-to-be-rendered-useless product, as you claim is such a great business tactic?

Ridiculous. I'm ashamed of myself for dignifying your post with a response.
 

FoolKiller

New member
Feb 8, 2008
2,409
0
0
alphamalet said:
Well this just opens a new can of worms. If this is possible at the end of the generation, then why not just scrap the DRM now? It's the question that begs to be answered.

Additionally, if games will still be playable, then I guess we aren't relying on the cloud too much then...?
Okay. If I have the games I can still play them.

Now the question is can I add to my library after the generation ends?
 

Aggieknight

New member
Dec 6, 2009
229
0
0
I think history shows us that M$ will kill the functionality for content that you've licensed (note: you are not buying with the Xbone) when they are done with it. Remember "Play for Sure"?
 

RedEyesBlackGamer

The Killjoy Detective returns!
Jan 23, 2011
4,701
0
0
He didn't actually say anything. Either the "always online" isn't actually important to run games and all that "cloud" talk was bullshit or they plan to keep the servers running forever which is bullshit. So the typical PR from Microsoft about the Xbox One.
 

Severian

New member
Jun 13, 2013
65
0
0
If some games require the cloud to run properly, how in gods name could you keep playing them if their servers go offline? Seems like a lot of his answers were straight up deflections and didn't even answer them. Lots of spin talk. :(
 

Dryk

New member
Dec 4, 2011
981
0
0
I'll add this to the list of "Nah it'll be fine, just give us $500 and you'll see!" talk from Microsoft shall I

Severian said:
If some games require the cloud to run properly, how in gods name could you keep playing them if their servers go offline? Seems like a lot of his answers were straight up deflections and didn't even answer them. Lots of spin talk. :(
This is film companies melting down movies for the silver all over again. Humans never learn -_-
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
BreakfastMan said:
So, basically... Wait until Gen-9 to get an Xbone, since all the crap DRM junk will be removed when the Xbone's successor comes around? Good to know, I will be looking forward to buying an Xbone at that time, then.
You know how EA games remain 'playable' when 'support' gets taken away? I think he means that rather than maintaining any semblance of functionality or desirability.

There's a lot of very carefully worded answer coming from Microsoft, the total lack of definitive yes/no answers is not confidence building.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
"Sure, we've said a bunch of confusing, contradictory, and even outright dickish stuff BUT TRUST US GUISE!"

Nazulu said:
So it becomes 'flexible' when the generation ends. Good to know.
Which is about when I'll be willing to invest in one.