So basically all the bullshit about the 24 hour checkins being "mandatory" and "critical to the console" was complete shit. Thats Microsoft for your forward thinking pro-consumer outlook.
Bingo.alphamalet said:Well this just opens a new can of worms. If this is possible at the end of the generation, then why not just scrap the DRM now? It's the question that begs to be answered.
Additionally, if games will still be playable, then I guess we aren't relying on the cloud too much then...?
Well, depending on how hard-coded it is into the system, it could take anywhere from a week to over a month of working on this single problem to get the disk thing to work and, because they are likely crunched for time as is, they probably won't get to that until after the console gets out and they work out all the bugs.Adam Locking said:If that's the case, there must be a simple (ish) way to disable this in a console right from day one? I can see this being the mod-chip fiasco all over again...uchytjes said:If anything, they'll make an update where they put in an option to have the Xbone work like normal, but when it isn't connected it'll require the disk be in the drive regardless of installation.
Be willing to do research on the Xhole then too because who knows what else they're going to pull.Zachary Amaranth said:"Sure, we've said a bunch of confusing, contradictory, and even outright dickish stuff BUT TRUST US GUISE!"
Which is about when I'll be willing to invest in one.Nazulu said:So it becomes 'flexible' when the generation ends. Good to know.
Well they haven't said if you can both play the same game at the same time yet, or if it will even work if you're signed into your account, just that the family can play games from your library without you being signed in at that console. It's entirely possible you still can't play the same game together except for split screen, but hopefully it means that while one person is playing X another person can simultaneously be playing Y at their console. Optimistically you all can be online and playing the same game, but I think at best based on the decisions Microsoft has made so far you both can be online and not playing the same game. Not a bad feature in all honesty, but there is still too much other crap with the console to warrant me purchasing one.Callex said:Credit where it's due - it's perhaps one of the few good changes they made, but now that the Microsoft hate-ball has gained momentum it's been completely overshadowed.Revolutionary said:I have to say after watching a few Major Nelson interviews, he is genuinely really excited about this "family proposition" or whatever the fuck. Despite myself I really want to know exactly how that works.
You can have a shared game library with up to 10 other family members, with two consoles at a time accessing and playing games from it. As someone in a household of many gamers this would be an absolute godsend. I wish there was a steam equivalent of this sort of thing.
Well that may be when I actually get a XBone, once I've seen that it will actually work and is worth getting. Funny that ay :-/Nazulu said:So it becomes 'flexible' when the generation ends. Good to know.
Oh, I always do my homework. I'm just saying that the time the games can be played without the service is about the time I'll give a crap.Nazulu said:Be willing to do research on the Xhole then too because who knows what else they're going to pull.Zachary Amaranth said:"Sure, we've said a bunch of confusing, contradictory, and even outright dickish stuff BUT TRUST US GUISE!"
Which is about when I'll be willing to invest in one.Nazulu said:So it becomes 'flexible' when the generation ends. Good to know.
Actually, the point of this DRM appears to be to make sure they can monetise the consumer as much as possible. I'd be shocked to find this had much, if anything to do with piracy. I'm sorry, but that's the way this works.Akalabeth said:Um, so people don't PIRATE THE GAMES?alphamalet said:Well this just opens a new can of worms. If this is possible at the end of the generation, then why not just scrap the DRM now? It's the question that begs to be answered.
Isn't that obvious?
That's the whole point of DRM.
Except, again, that's not what he said. What he said was they wouldn't just shut down the servers at the end of the cycle, not that your Xbone would never be bricked by Microsoft taking the servers offline.Phrozenflame500 said:So basically all the bullshit about the 24 hour checkins being "mandatory" and "critical to the console" was complete shit. Thats Microsoft for your forward thinking pro-consumer outlook.
DRM doesn't prevent piracy. This has been all but proven at this point. This is about controlling the paying customers, not the people who crack your system and download your games for free.Akalabeth said:Um, so people don't PIRATE THE GAMES?alphamalet said:Well this just opens a new can of worms. If this is possible at the end of the generation, then why not just scrap the DRM now? It's the question that begs to be answered.
Isn't that obvious?
That's the whole point of DRM.
I find it incredibly insulting that he thinks all our concerns will be instantly alleviated simply through the overuse of a word like "awesome."When asked why the Xbox One couldn't use a physical disk as a "failsafe" to bypass the 24 hour check-in policy, Hryb went on to talk about how its not possible because of how awesome the Xbox One's "family sharing library" is.