Xbox One Won't Support SDTVs

Flunk

New member
Feb 17, 2008
915
0
0
I can't believe this surprises anyone. Everything else made in the last 5 years hasn't supported HDTV either.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
I'm honestly surprised so many of you still have sdtvs. If any of you need a cheap alternative you can get a computer monitor with HDMI in for probably around $200 and it will be 1080p. It won't have speakers, but hey; it's cheap for a reason.

In fact, it might be worth checking to see if your PC monitor already has this feature!
 

Ukomba

New member
Oct 14, 2010
1,528
0
0
Excuse me, my current primary tv is a very nice large screen SDTV. While I certainly could get a small tv for a couple hundred dollars, to get a hdtv of similar size would be over 1000 dollars. 1000 dollars to replace a perfectly functional tv I would then have no room for and have to get rid of. F*** you XBone.
 

enriquetnt

New member
Mar 20, 2010
131
0
0
Theyr called ADAPTORS theyr CHEAP and EASY TO USE, i dont think there is even a point in all this discussion
 

enriquetnt

New member
Mar 20, 2010
131
0
0
AC10 said:
I'm honestly surprised so many of you still have sdtvs. If any of you need a cheap alternative you can get a computer monitor with HDMI in for probably around $200 and it will be 1080p. It won't have speakers, but hey; it's cheap for a reason.

In fact, it might be worth checking to see if your PC monitor already has this feature!
you dont actually need speakers you can just use any pc speakers you have liying around or just buy some of the dirt cheap ones that are out there (or invest a tiny bit more and get a small 2.1 logitech or creative speakers sistem they still sound like crap but at leas youll get some bass and it will be far better than ANY tv speaker)
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
The bad thing is, this doesn't just make it incompatible with SD TVs. It also knocks early HDTVs out of the running, both CRT sets and early Plasma/LCD sets. One of my college roommates (and this was only a few years ago) had an LCD set handed down from his uncle, which had initially been purchased in 2004. It completely lacked an HDMI input, although it had both Component and VGA in, either one of which is sufficient for HD video. In fact, the only reason you can't generally get 1080P out of component cables is the reason listed in this article -- HDCP. The cables are plenty capable of it, but the DRM that came along with Blu-Ray won't let the video go out of them at full quality, because there's no way to prevent people from making near perfect copies if you do it that way. Not that that stopped the pirates from getting perfect copies anyway.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
enriquetnt said:
Theyr called ADAPTORS theyr CHEAP and EASY TO USE, i dont think there is even a point in all this discussion
What kind of adapters are you talking about? Just getting a box to convert from HDMI to VGA or Component will set you back about $100, and that's assuming you want to hook up to an HD monitor that lacks HDMI, and not downscale things to something an SD TV can work with. Most units like that also introduce input lag, which is bad for gaming.
 

chozo_hybrid

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
Jul 15, 2009
3,479
14
43
Only reason I have an HDTV is because my old one broke down and in my town nowhere sold SD ones, so I had to HDTV, it's nice, but why not make an option for it like PS3 - 360, some games may not support it, fine I guess... Would still be stupid, but it would better then nothing.

So HDMI is the minimum? That's rough for people with early HD sets.
Ukomba said:
Excuse me, my current primary tv is a very nice large screen SDTV. While I certainly could get a small tv for a couple hundred dollars, to get a hdtv of similar size would be over 1000 dollars. 1000 dollars to replace a perfectly functional tv I would then have no room for and have to get rid of. F*** you XBone.
Out of curiosity, how big is the TV because my 40 inch screen full HD cost me about the equivalent of $600 USD at the time, was three years back.
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
"What's that? You're not rich? Well we're rich. I don't see what the problem is." Um... classism?

I don't know... I feel like this is going to be a problem for enough people for it to... well, be a problem. What I see here is Microsoft once again just telling us to deal with it because it's more convenient for them. I'm really starting to feel like we've become the last thing on Microsoft(and Sony)'s mind. All of a sudden gamers are the secondary, or even tertiary, concern. Why is every announcement about these new systems making me want them less and less? Isn't it supposed to be the opposite? Weren't we nearly crapping ourselves in excitement when the current generation was first coming out?

Also, as I read this news article, I was wondering why it was trying to make poor jokes, and why most of what wasn't a poor joke was idle speculation. Then I realized it was Carter again.
 

taciturnCandid

New member
Dec 1, 2010
363
0
0
Ukomba said:
Excuse me, my current primary tv is a very nice large screen SDTV. While I certainly could get a small tv for a couple hundred dollars, to get a hdtv of similar size would be over 1000 dollars. 1000 dollars to replace a perfectly functional tv I would then have no room for and have to get rid of. F*** you XBone.
Higher resolution means you don't need as large of a screen. That huge sdtv it takes to be able to barely read the text on current gen games isn't needed on an hdtv. The same goes for about anything an sdtv does.

The thing with it is that you can have that huge size as a luxury, but a smaller sized hdtv is actually a lot more effective and easier to see than a bigger sdtv
 

bug_of_war

New member
Nov 30, 2012
887
0
0
Proverbial Jon said:
Oh, well god damn! It does still play VCR tapes though, right?

Way to force everyone into your personal warped vision of the future Microsoft.
Trishbot said:
Well, as someone with ZERO HD TVs in my household, because they're all 90's era, big screen SD ones, this is certainly unfriendly news.

I actually think the last poll found that nearly 30-40% of TV owners still owned SD TVs as their primary television... so that seems like a lot of the market they'll still miss out on.
Capitano Segnaposto said:
No shit. Couple this with the fact that they are screwing the used games portion AND the fact that you have to be online? They are seriously limiting their profits.

Also, I am so sorry for not being Rich, Microsoft. It isn't like I am trying to pay for College, Bills, and a one year study-abroad trip next year. Not to mention that there are probably many others worse off than I am.

Ugh, more and more info from this seriously pisses me off.
This is why I'm on the fence about the issue, these points all have validity to them. On one hand, Proverbial Jon is correct in the sense that they are simply moving forward with technology, as should be expected, as well as having previous examples of the requirements of new hardware being better. The VCR tape became the DVD, which in turn became Blu Ray. The Vinyl records became the Cassette tapes, which then became CDs. In Australia we've just recently lost all analogue signals in favour of digital, which basically forced people to get set top boxes in order to receive digital TV, and you know what? It went off without a hitch, everyone is still watching tv, and no one is really that put out.

HOWEVER, Darwin did once say, "If you specialise, you die" (paraphrased) and the Xbox One does seem to be making itself a very specialised unit which could become it's downfall. The whole needing a HDTV isn't a huge downer, but add in the need to connect once a day to the internet, basic eradication of the used game market, etc. it's starting to look very tough for the majority of people to get proper use out of it. While I wouldn't say Jim Sterling's comment in his recent video on which he said, "only the rich will be able to use the Xbox One" is true, I will say that it looks like it's going to be a very special group of people.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
no SD TVs? fine. i mean sure a lot of peopel still use that since Xbox360 cant do better visual. Though if you want your console to run fullHD, you cant cram it into SDTV. so whiel the change is not a good thing, it is somewhat understandable from a new hardware perspective.

Dial-ups. About damn time, dialup is atechnology that died in the 90s and supporting it still is more of a restriction than a feature.

Punchcards. what is that? i never heard of one.
Capitano Segnaposto said:
Also, I am so sorry for not being Rich, Microsoft. It isn't like I am trying to pay for College, Bills, and a one year study-abroad trip next year. Not to mention that there are probably many others worse off than I am.
If you are poor, paying for your studies and saving money for future studies, your not the one to buy new consoles anyway now are you.

an annoyed writer said:
So, not only are they making it a nightmare to try and set up on an older TV, they're also trying to tell machinima makers to fuck off? Well, I guess we'll oblige. Thank you microsoft, for telling us straight-up that you don't want anything to do with us. It seems the feeling is mutual.
How are they telling machinima makers to fuck off? care to elaborate?


Xan Krieger said:
I can't see the difference between HDTV and SDTV so I have my SDTV and enjoy it. Just another reason I'm glad I'm upgrading my PC this year.
Not trying to attack you or anything, but if you really cant see the difference (and not just extragarating to make a point) you should consider getting glasses or using a larger than 10" screen.

Ukomba said:
Excuse me, my current primary tv is a very nice large screen SDTV. While I certainly could get a small tv for a couple hundred dollars, to get a hdtv of similar size would be over 1000 dollars. 1000 dollars to replace a perfectly functional tv I would then have no room for and have to get rid of. F*** you XBone.
excuse me but anyone who has a SDTV with a large screen simply wasted his money, because there is aboslutely no reason to have huge screen on such small resolutions unless you are watching it from another room or trying to show TV to your neighboars through a window. It is not microsofts fault you have done a stupid decision to buying a SDTV instead of HDTV.

Frankly it should not be called HDTV anymore. Its not high definition, its standart definition, the SD shoudl stand for Small definition as it is actually very small. the world has moved on, its not 90s anymore.

Kaulen Fuhs said:
Sonic Doctor said:
If a person is truly interested and wants to get something, they will do what they have to do to get it.
Obviously, but there is a difference between someone who wants an Xbox and an HD TV, and someone who just wants an Xbox. It is foolish to cater to only one of these demographics, especially when you won't be profitting from the sale of HD TV's.
what is foolish is to think that anyone being sane woudl want a next gen games to be portrayed at SDTV resolution. If you are not getting a HD there is pretty much no reaosn for you to get xbox to begin with.

Owyn_Merrilin said:
enriquetnt said:
Theyr called ADAPTORS theyr CHEAP and EASY TO USE, i dont think there is even a point in all this discussion
What kind of adapters are you talking about? Just getting a box to convert from HDMI to VGA or Component will set you back about $100, and that's assuming you want to hook up to an HD monitor that lacks HDMI, and not downscale things to something an SD TV can work with. Most units like that also introduce input lag, which is bad for gaming.
my parents got an early plasma model and use a HDMI covnerter to VGA or w/e those 3 wires are. it cost them 60 LTL, which is around 20 dollars with current dollar prices.

AC10 said:
I'm honestly surprised so many of you still have sdtvs. If any of you need a cheap alternative you can get a computer monitor with HDMI in for probably around $200 and it will be 1080p. It won't have speakers, but hey; it's cheap for a reason.

In fact, it might be worth checking to see if your PC monitor already has this feature!
I recently went looknig around thinking i may be buying a new tv/monitor (multipurpose usage). what i found shocked me, how small resolution mdoern new model TVs are. i expected something like 2000p by now, turns out that is for monitors only and 3 times larger TVs still support 720p only. i mean come on why TV manufacturers are that stupid? Ill end buying a mionitor and using it for both things.

TheZooblord said:
long text snipped
Its not so much agasint people like you who just enjoy what they enjoy. its more towards people like, say, if i lsitened to vinyl records, then a new album came out and i would cause an outrage that they didnt print it on vinyl and isntead used a CD, how dare they use newer technology than i like. because thats exactly whats happening in this post.
 

Leg End

Romans 12:18
Oct 24, 2010
2,948
58
53
Country
United States
Considering I only just got an HDTV in 2011, this is pretty shit news.
That is, for my several dozen friends still playing on SD CRT TVs. And me when I don't have access to my shinyscreen.
 

Elamdri

New member
Nov 19, 2009
1,481
0
0
I mean, of all the legit things to whine about guys, we're going with "it doesn't support SDTV?"

I mean, yeah it sucks for people who don't have SDTV, but at some point the industry has to move on. HDTV is FIFTEEN years old. It's older than the Xbox and the Xbox 360. It's had plenty of time to get cheap; heck I bought a nice HDTV 2 years about for about 300 bucks. It's time to let SDTV fall to the wayside.
 

Seanfall

New member
May 3, 2011
460
0
0
...Okay so now this with the new Xbox...they just don't want to sell any of them do they?
 

Myndnix

New member
Aug 11, 2012
313
0
0
Oh. Well, shit.
I still use an SDTV because it works and I don't replace things until they stop working.
Not that I was planning on getting an Xbone anyway. Have you seen how crap those things are?
 

Belzera

Prinny Puncher
Apr 14, 2009
46
0
0
"The move has led to speculation that the console will likely be embracing High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP)"

So basically, if I understand this part clearly, the Xbone is going to be unfriendly to people wanting to use Capture devices? There are ways around it I suppose seeing as I have a capture card set up with the PS3 but still as for the HDTV aspect, please remember just because 2 thirds of people in america have HDTV's doesn't mean its the same across the world as for the line 'If you can afford this $X00 console you can afford a $X00 HDTV' for some people it comes down to a choice between the two on their budget.

But honestly this really is not a matter I should really be commenting on, I don't plan to get an Xbone there is nothing about it that attracts me and it seems like one of Xbones major selling point won't even work in the UK.