True, anyone who reads past the PS3 part sees that the entire article is about popular products that are rendered costly to repair in the event of a possible breakdown. And in that sense she is right to say that it is a bit more troublesome when your controller battery craps out (permanently) after prolonged use, because it isn't completely clear what to do at this point.EnzoHonda said:No one here actually thinks she meant that when it loses its charge the controller needs to be replaced? (Judging by the posts, you all do.) Even if it's not completely clear, she has a university degree most likely, give her a little credit. She's saying that unlike an XBox controller, you can't easily replace the battery pack. I look for stupid people all the time. This isn't it folks.
What IS stupid about the article is the fact that she seems to think that buying a new controller after it dies makes the PS3 a lousy gift, when in actuality, it should work for several thousand hours (up to 8000 if you treat them right), making it a pretty good deal (even at $55) compared to other controllers with more replaceable batteries.
Example: she says replaceable AA batteries are better, but imagine how much money it would cost to keep a 360 controller or WiiMote charged for more than 4000 hours (a lot, depending on your battery of choice).
Also, it should be noted that you can find DualShock3 batteries online for $10, and that the manual shows how to replace them (with just a screwdriver, since it isn't 'glued' like this university graduate stated)
EDIT:
Holy crap, there's a video on that site where you can see the author call the PS3 a "Technological Armageddon". WTFrsacks said:... ( http://www.smartmoney.com/spending/technology/A-Grinchs-Gift-Guide/ )....