1) they probably don't communicate via one websiteFalloutJack said:Under the assumption that they can't COME BACK, I delete whatever site Anonymous congregates at so they're forced to bunk in with 4Chan.
It most certainly isn't. They were associated with the site extremely briefly, as in a couple weeks.henritje said:I think 4Chan is pretty much the only site where they congregateFalloutJack said:Under the assumption that they can't COME BACK, I delete whatever site Anonymous congregates at so they're forced to bunk in with 4Chan.
Under the idea that I may destroy one website in a 'for good' manner, I destroy 'that place Anon hangs out at', meaning that they can't have a hide-out, period. No negotiations. This is a case of reconstructing reality and I will not change my vote.Westaway said:1) they probably don't communicate via one websiteFalloutJack said:Under the assumption that they can't COME BACK, I delete whatever site Anonymous congregates at so they're forced to bunk in with 4Chan.
2) they would have no reason to return there. They would fin another obscure website
What about furaffinity? Its DA with more mature content AND furries. That's like upgrading from Stalin to the offspring of Cruella De'ville and Hitler.CM156 said:Deviantart.
Burn it to the ground.
No real contest, my friends. I really dislike that site.
I agree with this. If not this then Dig, it had it coming.XMark said:I'm personally opposed to all forms of web censorship so I wouldn't delete any websites.
But if I HAD to delete a website, hmm.... yeah, MySpace. It doesn't really need to exist anymore.
This, this, this, this, a million times this. I love you.Weslebear said:Use it to threaten the inhabitants of this site to stop being entitled elitist pricks.
Yeah they exist everywhere online but the concentration here is obscenely high, it's so fucking annoying because everything but the forums is fantastic on this site.
I Can't tell if you are being serious..... but just in case, you can go to a new story on THIS site with video of their reporters claiming a Japanese retelling of an English classic is brainwashing the youth with environmentalism. I swear FOX is as ridiculous as the Onion, if not more so!Forlong said:If Fox News is horribly inaccurate, then why is it the highest rated network? Not just above other news networks, ALL networks. That's like calling the highest rated show in the world dumb. You just insult the thousands that watch it. Then again, you're probably just a Bill Marr drone, who doesn't use logic or common sense to make conclusions.Tipsy Giant said:FOX NEWS
Maybe the idiots who believe their drivel would be forced to read actual news about actual events, rather than self created hysteria
Why was Fox News the only news network that reported racism in the church President Obama attended? Why was Fox News the only news network that reported BOTH SIDES of the health care debate? Why was Fox News the only news network reporting any of 500 pages of Obama's broken promises? If you want actual news, seems like Fox is your only choice. I know you believe something stupid like "they just support Republicans", but that just shows how little you know about them. All the candidates for Presidency are being put under scrutiny by Fox News. The only exception seems to be Mitt Romney, which is dumb and annoying.
Try to get facts before making accusations, because people who watch Fox News sure do.
They still make fucking Chuck Norris jokes. And Rickrolling is picking up speed there as the bees knees right now.henritje said:I would pick 9gag they steal every good thing from 4chan and still make arrow to the knee jokes.
These reasons here. I hate it and get by just fine with minimal use (its messaging is cheaper that texting); but I would have no problem at all with its removal.KlassixKAOS said:facebook.....and just watch the world burn.
Though I don't like everything on Fox News, thank you so much for this post. Yes it is slanted a bit to the right, but I suppose that is pure evil to the hip left wing young kids. I'm so tired of kids making it sound like the devil because they let everyone talk, including idiots. I'm sorry, but everyone I see bash Fox News seems uneducated to me now, mostly because I see that the kids who do bash it rarely have anything to say besides they're evil or stupid. So, thank you dude. Thank you.Forlong said:If Fox News is horribly inaccurate, then why is it the highest rated network? Not just above other news networks, ALL networks. That's like calling the highest rated show in the world dumb. You just insult the thousands that watch it. Then again, you'reTipsy Giant said:FOX NEWS
Maybe the idiots who believe their drivel would be forced to read actual news about actual events, rather than self created hysteria
probably just a Bill Marr drone, who doesn't use logic or common sense to make conclusions.
Why was Fox News the only news network that reported racism in the church President Obama attended? Why was Fox News the only news network that reported BOTH SIDES of the health care debate? Why was Fox News the only news network reporting any of 500 pages of Obama's broken promises? If you want actual news, seems like Fox is your only choice. I know you believe something stupid like "they just support Republicans", but that just shows how little you know about them. All the candidates for Presidency are being put under scrutiny by Fox News. The only exception seems to be Mitt Romney, which is dumb and annoying.
Try to get facts before making accusations, because people who watch Fox News sure do.