Quote function isn't working atm.
'hate campaign'? That's a pretty strong claim. Is gg a hate campaign for lobbying intel to pull sponsorship from gamasutra?
You didn't think it it was a hate campaign against Intel. Even though it was.
A question mark is usually an indicator of a question. You say that intel received threats and accusations of misogyny. On a campaign wide scale. Surely there is some evidence of this right?
You say its not industry wide so it doesn't matter. it does matter, and it is an industry wide problem when the entire industry isn't condemning it.
I disagree. It would be nice if the industry as a whole condemned harassment, but when you told me I should be condemning the industry
for harassment, that implies the industry as a whole is engaging in harassment. Which I don't see, so I can't see it as an industry wide issue.
You refused to see an industry wide problem when it is blatant. That means you refuse to acknowledge why we are angry and therefore belittling it.
Blatant to who? Just because I don't agree with your viewpoint doesn't mean I refuse to acknowledge that you're angry, nor was I belittling you. In fact I can prove it, I sent a PM to you specifically regarding this. Here's the text. If you want a screen cap on top of that, I can provide one later tonight after I get home.
Hey, I wanted to apologize for telling you to 'calm your shit' in that last PM. It was uncalled for. I trust that you are angry about all this, and I got a bit defensive.
That said, I still don't agree with gamergate as a movement, but do support better journalistic standards for the industry.
You care more about making GG look bad than anything else, more than willing to make up shit just to slander it like lying about where the Wu death threat came from. Harassment is only a tool for you to grind your axe with your personal bias.
This more than says you don't care for harassment only until you can use it as a bargaining chip.
Do I care about not letting gg lie about it's orgins, and pointing out inconsistencies in it's mission statement? Absolutely. Did I make anything up about where the Brianna Wu threat came from? Absolutely not. Your personal opinion on 'me using harassment' is only your opinion. You haven't provided a shred of evidence for it, yet repeat it like a broken record as if it's stated fact.
I don't care if you personally, or gg as a whole goes after harassment. If ya'll do, great. But I don't care, because as far as I can see, it's not part of gg's mission.
This too, you don't care what gamergate or notyourshield finds, only that you find more spin to slander it.
When you slander gamergate, you slander notyourshield.
BS. Not only have I never slandered gg, gg is not the same thing as notyourshield. Criticising one is not criticising the other. To paint it as such is highly dishonest.
When you slander notyourshield, you are belittling minorities and their feelings on hateful media.
Which I have never done.
and you see where I am going with this. You are working with the same hateful journalists who want this gone so they can post about how much they hate the jews and black men.
You are enabling the journalists to say whatever because of your personal hang ups at the expense of minorities.
I can see where you're trying to go with this, and it isn't working.
I am still waiting on a quote where I have belittled minorities. I'm still waiting on a source that journalists set their fans on people, and that I defended that.
