Im aware that he aint into the whole multiplayer scene, but this game has a very poor singleplayer, the multiplayer is the main aspect.
After all the "OMG its so awesome it is better than anything" It has been getting nice to see a new view on it.meditator101 said:Good to see someones finally criticizing this game!
This may shock you, but it may be because it is actually a pretty good game. Waiting around for someone to say something you agree with isn't a barometer of a game's quality.Jaredin said:After all the "OMG its so awesome it is better than anything" It has been getting nice to see a new view on it.meditator101 said:Good to see someones finally criticizing this game!
And, as usual. Cant disagree with any of it, heh.
TV_Casualty said:Bioshock 2.
Decent
Hey, you misspelled System Shock 2 there.Playable
Because blowing stuff up is fun. You got someone camping in a house giving you trouble. Blow the house up around him. It makes things more dynamic. You just can't hide behind an indestructible wall and take potshots at people you actually have to move.ItsAPaul said:Sounds like a realistic shooter being too realistic. My cover can be blown up? Then why the hell is this a game? I of course don't know from playing it since fps games are all terrible, but thats how MW2 is.
Ha. True, true.Opacic said:TV_Casualty said:Bioshock 2.DecentHey, you misspelled System Shock 2 there.Playable
That's an insult to System Shock 2. Bioshock 1 was an okay analog to SS2, Bioshock 2 is a big steaming pile that fixed bad game mechanics and tossed all good bits like atmosphere out the window.Opacic said:TV_Casualty said:Bioshock 2.DecentHey, you misspelled System Shock 2 there.Playable
try saying its name twice in a rowDublin Solo said:DPPFFRWSIWWBTONOTMTWHAAFAPAHD shooter?
it has a nice ring to it, don't you think?