amazing. the game sucks. well, no surprise there. we knew already that the SP is just a mindless time waster wile the MP is more the center of it. still, i dont think i will pick it up. new dlc for BF3 comes out and i will be busy with it.
But don't you see? Academia is trying to hurt people! Why else would they do stuff like think about an issue and look at it from more than one perspective. Clearly that's the work of poofy librals who duuk ar jahbs and confuse the issue by being clever. Rabble rabble.Zeldias said:This isn't sides; that's the sociological definition. If you don't like it, go write a fucking book and make arguments and get peer reviewed and shit. Unless you're gonna tell me that the entirety of academia is secretly trying to hurt white people's feelings.Father Time said:Don't bother us with that bullshit 'privilege + power' definition, your side made up so you can say racism against whites is impossible.Zeldias said:Just popping in to say racism is about more than people hurting/being mean to you. It's also about the systems of oppression that operate throughout our (in my case, American) culture. White people can't be victims of racism because racism is about more than people hurting you;
And that's because you're operating under a definition of racism that is bullshit.Zeldias said:People who think it's possible to be racist against whites, particularly in America or Western Europe, are hilarious to me.
I don't deny it's probably a reasonable game, however Artic Eagle's post is so over the top it borders on parody and from what other posters have brought up about his post history, it seems most likely it is a parody, not to mention he's been on this site almost a year and has the "watched 100 ZP reviews" badge. You'd think after over a hundred ZP's he'd know in advance what Yahtzee's opinion would be on this game!doggie015 said:Jim Stirling gave it an 8.5 on a site where the average starts at 5 for god's sake! While the post was a little bit over the top it IS at least a decent game! Source: http://www.destructoid.com/review-call-of-duty-black-ops-ii-238414.phtmlJoJo said:ARCTIC_EAGLE said:Wow, worst review EVER! Any professional review would give this game, the most amazing in history, a 90-100 or 4/5. Every single part of this game is new and interesting and amazing, you're inability to recognize that demonstrates how bad you are at reviewing. When COD:B03 comes out in 2 years you can correct you mistake by giving it a 90-100 like every other reviewer will. Be sure to do the same for COD:MW4, COD:MW5, COD:BO4, COD:MW6, etc. They will ALL be amazing and look amazing and just be more amazing then the amazingly amazing game that came before. In fact they'll be so amazing they'll amaze you into an amazement coma of amazement.
OT: No surprises here, the last COD game I really enjoyed was MW2, I tried my brother's version of MW3 but got bored once I'd got past the London level. Liked the political rant too :-D
(For comparison: Dishonored got 9.0)
To be fair, it says more about the audience than him. He talks crap all the time, it's a part of his videos. He goes over the top and often says things that are clearly untrue.GunsmithKitten said:You know, I really loathe playing this card, but I can't imagine anyone else being allowed to get away with as much bigotry and ignorance on world affairs as Croshow does. Even discounting the "White people and Americans all suck" lines (which are bad enough), his ignorance about Nicaraguan resistence groups and the shit they do TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE is pathetic.
But hey, I guess you can still get called insightful and funny when you're a funny talker with a British accent despite displaying such ignorance.