abort_user said:
Therumancer said:
...
Oh yes, one minor point I will make is that I think the comments about the "14 year old ideal of masculinity" sort of misses the target. Rather I'd simply say that the game is presenting typical masculinity, face it... guys are wired that way. The modern meterosexuals are more or less an attempt at self supression.
Or let me put it to you this way, we can either have a macho dude driven by a desire to protect, avenge, conquer, and destroy, who acts like a warrior (which mandates a degree of emotional repression while he's doing his thing), or some dude who wants to sit around and talk about his feelings and confusion over the state of human emotion constantly.
I suppose one of the big problems is that a compromise is VERY hard to do, which is why the tiny handfull of characters that pull it off are noteworthy. In general you've got a choice between a Soldier/Warrior, a sarcastic swashbuckler type, or some fruit who would be the the lead man for a chick flick (or one of those gay-seeming supernatural creatures from paranormal romance books and the movies based on them).
In general, I think the withdrawn attitude is pretty realistic to what people who survive via violence wind up like. Granted, they DO insert too much angst into it though which I do not see as a nessicary conclusion.
I suppose War could have been done as the witty "Swashbuckler" of the Nathan Drake mould, which is what you'd get the the "check it out, I'm a monster truck with legs" vibe. However I imagine Yahtzee would have hated that more...
thats mostly horse shit. its socialization. guys arent one way or another. society trains them to behave a certain way regardless of whether its instinctual and the same also applies to women. men are often taught at a young age not to show emotion. its a sign of weakness. whereas woman are taught the opposite. some people believe this is one reason mental illness is far more frequent in males.
just because you think men should be stereotypically masculine doesnt mean youre describing masculinity. even if you think men should be "metrosexual" (btw i hate that word since it has nothing to do with a males sexual preference or anything else inherently related to sex) i would say the same thing. men have a cock, naturally more hair, naturally lower percentage of body hair, etc. most behavioral differences between males and females are almost all provably a result of socialization just by examining a wide variety of cultures.
but i also took Yahtzees comment about 14 year old boys to mean something entirely different. the guy with the big sword is a sexually charged image. a 14 year is around the age of puberty so its appeal to this demographic should be obvious. personally i think its childish to a watch "macho" man battle with giant phallus. also i find the idea to be rather homoerotic which is not my idea of masculine but it very may be yours.
Hmmm well today I received numerous responses on two subjects saying pretty much the same thing. As the most extreme statement due to the ending I will respond to this issue here.
Simply put I am a believer in human instinct and that gender roles and behaviors CAN be changed by society, but people gravitate in certain directions naturally. Some studies I read in College for example talked about how when dealing with young children who couldn't really have been conditioned, boys naturally gravitate towards war toys and games, action, and violence, where girls naturally gravitate toward prettier things with a more peaceful orientation. There are other opinions, but this seemed to be the overall conclusion reinforced by the most evidence.
Freud and Jung have some interesting points, but in the end I do not think everything comes down to sex, even in an abstract sense. For example I do not think a sword, even a really big one is a phallic symbol. While such interpetations can be amusing to an extent it's more or less BS.
Swords are pretty much functional (a blade attached to a handle) when it comes to killing and breaking things it's very efficient, and the bigger the sword the more effective it's going to be. Carrying a sword the sides of a volkswagon is intended to imply superhuman abillity and be about "OMG that would hurt" more than anything. I will say that the giant sword was coolest when Cloud did it for Final fantasy VII (which brought it into the mainstream it seems), but since I feel it's gotten overdone, moving from a trademark weapon that was differant, to something you kind of expect when it comes to Japanese games. What's more it worked with the somewhat cartoony FF VII art style for the time, it looks silly when portrayed in a more realistic and "Gritty" context.
That said, the whole "Meterosexual" thing basically involves men repressing their instincts for the benefit of women as much as anything. It's kind of sexist in a way because you don't see the other gender doing the same thing quite as much.
It should also be noted that "Emo" is overused in pop culture. It's not so much about every guy having to be an emotionless robot, but rather when someone sits down and goes through these massive analysises of their feelings, almost exclusively having to do with their grief, misery, and how unfair the world is. In short there are some profound statements about this kind ot thing, but "emos" are people who emulate it and turn into giant "pity me" whiners.
The Emo stereotype of constant misery and emotional angst is mocked because it's overused, and a lot of people see no real reason why every protaganist has to be a tortured wreck. I mean about the millionth time you've seen the "constantly hung over cop on the edge, whose wife has left him, and is 2" away from suicide and pursueing a death wish so he doesn't have to pull the trigger on himself" for example it becomes ridiculous and the guy whining about the same stuff as every other similar character gets stupid.
Also part of my point about warriors is not just about "Machismo" that's simply how things are. Part of learning to fight seriously is disapline and being able to put humanity behind you and do whatever needs to be done. Soldiers, Warriors, Martial Artists, they all get conditions (or condition themselves) this way. Many wind up being able to turn it on and off.
The point being is that when the chips are down you don't want a fighter who is going to be unable to act because he worries about the other guy having wives, familities, or whatever, or who will hestitate if he has to do truely disgusting and inhumane things in order to win (which I won't go into detail about). Thus, anyone who fights seriously is going to be pretty emotionally repressed, especially when they are pursueing a combat oriented goal of the sort in video games. This incidently includes women who when trained for combat learn the exact same things.
So basically,some people talk about the robot-like "Marine" stereotype, but guess what? That's what they train Marines and other soldiers to be like, and it's done for a reason. Rather than sitting around crying about how awful everything is, a "been there, done that, ate it" is advocated to push all that back, and peer pressure with everyone acting like that so it's infectuous is a big deal. Detached Gallows humor and such which is inserted into such things is "appropriate" given what these guys do.
Now there ARE other ways of doing the same thing, like the whole "Swashbuckler" stereotype of ironic detachment (which annoys Yahtzee), detachment (the overall goal) is the key element.
In the end it comes down to how seriously you want to take the character and want them to seem. War is the embodiment of killing people and breaking things, not someone who is going to sit down and talk about his feelings, especially when he's in the midst of a misplaced Armageddon.
At any rate, outside of the whole "Warrior" mentality thing, I am against the whole "Meterosexual" thing... which incidently I never called gay (others have made such innuendos, which makes me wonder if you all actually hate it as much as I do, but ae goig PC here for whatever motive.. maybe to appeal to female escapist posters or whatever), because I think it is stupid for men to be ashamed of acting like men, and to see it depreciated in the media except for mockeries like "The Man Show" and "Man Caves" (well more like satires for all intents and purposes, as you can get from the title if nothing else).
It all comes down to my overall attitude of refusing to be ashamed of anything I am and actually taking pride in it (and exagerrated it as much as other groups). Basically I refuse to be ashamed for being, White, Male, American, or Christian. All of which are increasingly presented as bad things.