"so HAH!"? You have a game where you could kill a single kid and you're comparing it to games where you could enact a campaign of bloody genocide against the children of the game world, where your number of child kills would be tracked, where those children could be gibbed, lit on fire, shocked to death, bludgeoned to death, force pushed into a wall over and over. Now you're going to compare this with someone falling to their knees in Deus Ex? At least the "so HAH!" gives me the choice to pretend you realize how bad this argument is.Allan Foe said:"Child Killer"? Feh, you could kill children way back in Deus Ex! Well, maybe not "children", "a child" would be more accurate -- the annoying bugger in the Chinese marketplace, he was the only kid in the game, I think. And DX was ported to PS2 with a rating of M, so HAH!
wow, I just looked a clip and you're off your rocker if you think that releasing some 2d side scrolling indie fart into a sea of random shock nonsense is anyway comparable to letting a player in Fable torch a kindergarten.Allan Foe said:Go play Derek Yu's freeware "I'm O.K - A Murder Simulator" and kill children all you want, then tell him that his current commercial effort Aquaria isn't selling (which would obviously be a lie) because he ruined his career.
We're talking consoles, we're talking mainstream, and we're talking next gen graphics. You're comparing some stupid little side scroller not impacting some indie game's sales with Peter Molyneux letting you blow children's heads clean off(with a slow mo money shot), this makes you an idiot.
The difference between MK's blood heavy attract mode and blowing children's heads off is obvious. I'm sure ROTT and Duke Nukem 3d caught the same kind of fire that Mortal Kombat did ... oh wait they didn't because they were computer games.Ragdrazi said:Controversial games of the time were getting a lot more exposure then just being on consoles. Games like Moral Kombat, Night Trap, and Rise of the Triad were getting exposure in the US congress.
Look comparing the climates now and then is pointless. It's almost as if you think there is a physical envelope that has been pushed, and everyone looks to that envelope before they say anything. Fallout 1 was not some world shattering singularity that moved everyone forward to your erudite way of thinking, sorry.There has never been a video game released that has received an AO rating for anything but sexual content. That includes modern splatter-fests like Manhunt. And there's nothing like that level of gore or brutality in Fallout.
Most people like to ignore when someone has absolutely destroyed them in forums, but not you, you're gonna totally deflect it with your zany brand of humor.See, and now you're rocketing down the hill of your own crazy so fast the wheels have come off. It's like I've insulted your mom, and I really don't think I have. Shh, shh, shh, Worm, it's ok. Would you like to talk about it? Here, have some hot cocoa with me.
I'll just restate myself, because it is the final word on this topic: No one is making full 3d games where you can blow off a child's limbs because it is taboo, and none of you are going to make them because as much as you'd like to deny it, you understand the reality of the situation. It's currently unacceptable to include that kind of material in a game, end of story. If someone made a game like this for the PC they'd be wise to release it anonymously.