Right you are. I remember feeling horrible the first that that happened to me.Ragdrazi said:The great thing about the child endangerment was it added so much to gameplay even if you weren't an evil character. Occasionally you'd get little kids straying into your fire fights and, invariably, a few would get hit and die. It made the bleak wasteland all the bleaker.Lordok said:Fallout 1 anyone?WickedSkin said:Murdering children is the biggest taboo ever, and if someone breaks that, I will tell him "good job".You even got a "perk" that tagged you as a child killer. Made people hate you
![]()
Don't worry, he will. It's just so BIG (no homo)that it takes a while to write up a rant that matches the game's lengthBanok said:I wanted him to do far cry 2![]()
Nice one, but it isn't yours. That's something the Australian Gamer guys said. The fact you have a paltry one post to your name makes me especially suspicious, as is the fact that this phrase is completely unchanged from the original statement in the podcast.Lusperus said:'cause thats what I always wanted to do in a game, pay child support
God the idea that somehow four pixels equal a fully rendered child's brain exploding in slo-motion is such motherfucking bullshit. No game is ever going to let you kill kids, except for indie stuff, and even then that will probably make the guy who developed it a pariah. If ZP is so fucking concerned why doesn't he blaze this trail?Lordok said:Fallout 1 anyone?WickedSkin said:Murdering children is the biggest taboo ever, and if someone breaks that, I will tell him "good job".You even got a "perk" that tagged you as a child killer. Made people hate you
![]()
Those were great games. I guess since the graphics were not that advanced at the time the designers had more time to concetrate on story and atmosphere.Lordok said:Right you are. I remember feeling horrible the first that that happened to me.
Ahhhh *Sighs and lovingly remembers Fallout 1 and 2*
No offense but if he is ranting then he can't find anything to review can he?Neosage said:I heartily...heartaly.....heartelly........I strongly agree with you!Qayin said:I really hope people won't be taking this review too seriously.
I'm a big fan of ZP, and Yahtzee's work outside of the Escapist - particularly the John DeFoe games - but I can still clearly see that this was nothing but a rant, not a review.
Yahtzee usually provides something to agree with, something that isn't just nitpicking, but this was fairly pathetic, to the point where I found myself slightly angered.
I understand the need to entertain, but it seems that with this, and the previous few reviews, Yahtzee is starting to sacrifice his integrity as a reviewer, for the sake of humour.
If you want to beat up children, you shouldn't be looking for it on video games - I was under the impression that it was common knowledge that violence against children was a big no-no in the gaming industry, yet Yahtzee seems unaware of this, as he's gone ahead and complained about it.
I also find this rather contradictory - recently in an article for news.com.au Yahtzee wrote about the censorship of Silent Hill. In this article, he wrote that anyone who claimed that violence was essential to the gaming experience was A) More or less wrong and B) Slightly psychopathic. Yet here he is, complaining that being unable to hit children somehow damages his enjoyment.
This video was as funny as usual, but lacked credibility; please don't do what most Yahtzee fans do, and take this as divine gospel - do not let this rant sway your opinion of Fable 2.
Then again, I personally love Fable 2, and worship it as a beacon of hope in the gaming industry, so perhaps I'm heavily biased myself.
EDIT; To clarify - As a rant, this was hilarious. As a review...pretty damn poor.
Also, the issue with violence against children in games is interactivity. You're allowed to watch a child get shot, but you are not allowed to shoot a child yourself. There is a difference, there; watching a child be shot is one thing, wanting to and trying to shoot a child yourself is, well, pushing the limit of acceptible content.
I also hope nobody takes this review seriously because for the first time in a long time Yahtzee went way too easy on a game, considering how god-awful it is. Ok, he (rightly) lambasted it for the absurd claims it made to freedom, the freedom to not do anything until you meet some arbitrary boolean controlled variable. He (rightly) panned it for the woodness of the army of NPCs in this game, each and every one remarkable in their unremarkableness. He (bloody well rightly!) hurled shit all over it for the absolutely absurd system of making money - blacksmithing for 3 hours by (I shit you not) pressing 'A' in synch to a little moving icon over and over and over and over and over and over again.Qayin said:I really hope people won't be taking this review too seriously.
I'm a big fan of ZP, and Yahtzee's work outside of the Escapist - particularly the John DeFoe games - but I can still clearly see that this was nothing but a rant, not a review.
Yahtzee usually provides something to agree with, something that isn't just nitpicking, but this was fairly pathetic, to the point where I found myself slightly angered.
I understand the need to entertain, but it seems that with this, and the previous few reviews, Yahtzee is starting to sacrifice his integrity as a reviewer, for the sake of humour.
If you want to beat up children, you shouldn't be looking for it on video games - I was under the impression that it was common knowledge that violence against children was a big no-no in the gaming industry, yet Yahtzee seems unaware of this, as he's gone ahead and complained about it.
I also find this rather contradictory - recently in an article for news.com.au Yahtzee wrote about the censorship of Silent Hill. In this article, he wrote that anyone who claimed that violence was essential to the gaming experience was A) More or less wrong and B) Slightly psychopathic. Yet here he is, complaining that being unable to hit children somehow damages his enjoyment.
This video was as funny as usual, but lacked credibility; please don't do what most Yahtzee fans do, and take this as divine gospel - do not let this rant sway your opinion of Fable 2.
Then again, I personally love Fable 2, and worship it as a beacon of hope in the gaming industry, so perhaps I'm heavily biased myself.
EDIT; To clarify - As a rant, this was hilarious. As a review...pretty damn poor.
Also, the issue with violence against children in games is interactivity. You're allowed to watch a child get shot, but you are not allowed to shoot a child yourself. There is a difference, there; watching a child be shot is one thing, wanting to and trying to shoot a child yourself is, well, pushing the limit of acceptible content.
You mean, complaining that the game protects the children in an incredibly half-assed way that puts a bullet in the game's immersion, just to shut up a few superstitious tightwads who think every act of violence in-game magically causes something similar to happen in real life.Qayin said:Yet here he is, complaining that being unable to hit children somehow damages his enjoyment.