Wait what?Royas said:Not the most amusing ZP ever, but not bad. I disagree with some of his points on Fallout 3, I didn't find the scenery at all monotonous, and saw little to no real similarity with Oblivion (except the 3-D, first person aspect). It seems that often what Yahtzee is complaining about in a game are things I really enjoyed.
You got 2/3 rightjuraigamer said:Good game, good review, same old bethesda
Yet another person who couldn't let go of the fact that it wasn't Van Buren. *rolls eyes*MolotoK said:Has Yahtzee ever played the originals?
I guess he didn't, because then he wouldn't compare fallout 3 to Branston Pickle.
I expected much more of a bashing for FO3 by Yahtzee.
It's probably the most disappointing game in the last decade or so and definetly the worst sequel ever made but no reviewer seems to notice....
That won't be disastrous. Oh wait, he called Fallout 3's environments monotonous...DeusFps said:Review far cry 2 next?
*eye roll* Someone made a strawmanAceDiamond said:Yet another person who couldn't let go of the fact that it wasn't Van Buren. *rolls eyes*MolotoK said:Has Yahtzee ever played the originals?
I guess he didn't, because then he wouldn't compare fallout 3 to Branston Pickle.
I expected much more of a bashing for FO3 by Yahtzee.
It's probably the most disappointing game in the last decade or so and definetly the worst sequel ever made but no reviewer seems to notice....
While I disagree with Yahtzee on a few points he does have a point that a lot of it does get monotonous at times, hence why i spend a lot of time picking a direction and exploring. But V.A.T.S. still never gets old.
I'm not complaining about thinks like the first person view or the strange combat system but about things like the incredibly bad writing, unbelievable characters and missing freedom of choice (the main quest has NO CHOICE WHATSOEVER right until the last 30seconds of the game.)AceDiamond said:Yet another person who couldn't let go of the fact that it wasn't Van Buren. *rolls eyes*