I registered to post in this thread. I've been a Yahtzee fan for a while, and I watched the Brawl review fiasco happen.
Mythbhavd said:
-snip-
Very early on in the forum, a couple of people said that it was a generally accepted rule not to make fun of your own fans. However, the emails that he quoted here were truly ridiculous. None of them were well reasoned arguments against his review.
-snip-
Of course they were ridiculous. Did you really think Yahtzee was going to respond to any well-reasoned emails he got? If an email said, "You can unlock every level and character without ever touching the single player," or "Since Brawl is a button masher, you will naturally be able to beat any pro-level player, right?" or "Not including Marth would have pissed off the hardcore Melee players to no end," he wouldn't have been able to respond to it, because those emails
are well reasoned, and they
are right. He had to pick the dumbest emails in his pile because doing otherwise would have made him look stupid. It's kind of disappointing that he didn't even try to have a reasonable discussion about it, but I didn't really expect him to from the get-go.
And, as it has so often been pointed out, a review is a subjective statement of opinion by one person who played the game. It should be noted that most (not all) of the objections in the SSBB forum could be summed up in the emails he reviewed here.
Very true. Reviews are subjective statements, but people (fanboy or not) had every right to be pissed off at his Brawl review for 2 reasons. First, he had his facts wrong. You don't have to play the single player to unlock characters. You
can, but it's not
required. Snake can be had after 10 minutes of multiplayer, and Yahtzee claims that it takes 10 hours to get Sonic. Done in multiplayer, Sonic can be yours after 3 hours of fighting. The second (and most important) reason people had to get pissed off was that he didn't just say, "Brawl is a shit game." He's entitled to say "Brawl is a shit game." because that's his opinion. He said, "Brawl is a shit game, and the people who like Brawl are shit people." I like Brawl, and last I checked I wasn't a shit person. I don't even like Brawl because it has Mario in it. I was a huge Powerstone fan, and I like Brawl because it's an incredibly deep fighting game. (As a side note, Smash Brothers wasn't even originally supposed to have any Nintendo characters in it. Those characters were added after the fighting system was developed) Others on this forum have commented that there wasn't as much of an uproar from the Halo 3 review he did, but he didn't insult Halo's fan base in that review, either.
I expect to be called a fanboy even though I haven't tried to convince anyone that Brawl is
teh best game evar, nor insulted the people who agreed with Yahtzee's review and subsequent email fallout. In real life, I'm actually quite hands-off as far as getting my friends to try new things. It's sad when people don't even seem to understand what "fanboy" means anymore. It's become an all-purpose term that people use to dismiss what others say. If you like a game, you can be considered a fanboy regardless of how you behave online and in real life. A lot like the U.S. political climate in the past few years, corralling people into a black-and-white fanboy or non-fanboy world makes actual discussion impossible to do.
The only well-reasoned reviews of Brawl I've ever heard have come from people who have actually played the game and who approached it with an open-enough mind to see the deep fighting game beneath the party-game facade. Anyone who's actually played the game will tell you that it's a party game if you set it up one way and a strategic fighter if you set it up another way. In other words, it's versatile. In truth, the best reviews I've heard come from avid Melee players who can comment on the differences between the two games, but those won't mean much to someone who's never played Melee.