Indigo_Dingo said:
Yahtzee does not give legitamite reasons for Brawl.
He does give legitimate reasons for not liking the game. It's just that some people disagree with his reasoning. That's their choice. I've found that reviewers tend to get bored with the mundane. Be it movies, TV, books, music, theatre, or video games; most reviewers are looking for that special something that will set it apart from all the other products out there. That's why it often seems that what we like, they do not. And, it's important to remember that reviewers are often forced to wade through the mediocre to get to something that stands out, so their patience wears thin.
In his SSBB review, he made the following points. All of them are legitimate reasons to not like a game.
1. This game suffers from a problem common to all fighters. It can quickly descend into a fight that is no more challenging than hitting buttons over and over with no attempt at strategy. It's not a programming fault, but it's still there.
2. The characters are too small and the camera zooms out too far.
3. The particle effects are distracting and obscure the action.
4. For a first time play, it is disappointing to have to unlock characters that have been hyped by the company for the new game.
5. Some of the characters aren't that well known outside of Japan. Since this is a world-wide release, it should feature the more mainstream characters so that people can relate to the game better.
6. The single player is good and a lot of hard work was put into it, but they make you go through it twice which becomes boring and repetitive to the point that you feel like you're stuck in "Groundhog Day."
7. This game was disappointing because there is nothing new and interesting about it. It's the same old game repackaged and resold. Nintendo needs to develop some new concepts.
All of those points are legitimate reasons for disliking the game, especially for a reviewer. For the general public, those may be points that they are willing to forgive or even the same ones that draw them to the game in the first place.
Taking movies as an example, most people rave over movies that do the same thing over and over again. Why? Because it is the thing they like. Whether it's romance, drama, horror, or action, people are attracted to the same type of movie over and over. To a movie review who must sit through every movie that's coming out, it becomes a boring repetition of seeing the same movies over and over again with nothing to set them apart from the rest. That's why they often pick a movie that the general public really doesn't like or wouldn't normally see. Those are the movies that usually attempt something that is outside of the everyday experience.
Ben has expressed the same feelings in a number of his reviews. That's why he gave Psychonauts such a decent review. It was something that most people wouldn't play, but its creators were trying something new and, in his opinion, not only deserved a mention for trying it, but they actually succeeded. And, there are times that he, just like the general public, is attracted to a game because of its sameness. He'd still like to see something new and exciting, but the thing that he sees in that game is the thing that attracts him to games in general. His Gears of War review falls into that category. It wasn't anything new, but it contained the things he liked.
This game, to him, just came out as mediocre. It was nothing new and nothing stood out as something about which he should become excited. Neither he nor his friends enjoyed it and he doesn't recommend it. It seems that his acerbic wit, usually the draw to his reviews, and his attack on those people who descend into insane raving over a game are what turned many people off this time.
Like any reader or viewer of reviews, our job is to determine whether we will try the game and then decide if we like it. If a person has the same taste in games as the reviewer and finds the same things distracting in a game, then his review would do well to warn them away. If they do like the things that he doesn't, then they should be able to laugh at his wit and enjoy the game. If not, then they can wait until the next review and then get back to enjoying his wit and opinions.