So, the ones that do are the ones that post here? It may seem like common sense, but I assure you I am an academic and will wait until there's a clear verdict on this. Admittedly, I really want to believe that this is the case.Uszi said:I think that generally few people feel attacked by Yahtzee. Even when Yahtzee specifically attacks the fan boys, I feel like most of them just sort of shrug it off. They know when they begin watching that they're in for a satire, perhaps of themselves. At least, that's how I approach it.Tyrannus Argumentum said:(1). For those of you who "did not like the review", do you believe, at some level, that you felt it was a personal attack?
Indeed. Logical fallacies abound, as I stated. Both sides. Most of the calls for neutrality are ignored, or skewed, I think. Neutrality puts the damper on one's desire to seethe, and it appears that some people just want to seethe. And then there are les enfants provocateurs who probably gush support (or vitriol) simply to get a response.What happens, though, is that when you start reading the comments, you are definitely attacked by other people on the thread. This would have to do with the polarizing affect of strong opinions on the net -- if I love SSBB, and you happen to only mildly dislike it, then you will need to scream about how much you hate SSBB in order to be heard over my affectionate croonings for the game. Couple that with the fact that many people take a criticism of a game they love as some sort of criticism as a person, AND with the anonymity of attacking someone over the internet, and you have a multi-step, complex recipe for a 1000 reply thread.
You are correct. Beyond the video, what do we see in response from Yahtzee? Much like what do we see from Nintendo about critics of their games?I agree entirely with the huge paragraph block that followed your question. Except I still feel like the person who exasperates all the attacks is not Yahtzee, but instead people within the thread on both side. Yahtzee is generally only mentioned in a sort of abstract context, and the comments are specifically directed at an opponent within the thread and not at Yahtzee.(2). If Y is simply preaching to the choir, and you were one of the ones who responded negatively to this piece, why did you feel the need to respond?
Dare I mention that this seems to lend support to Penny Arcade's "Internet Fuckwad Theory". The real trick is distinguishing the provocateurs from those who have seriously identified with a game.We can't. But people tend to step down several maturity levels whenever they log on to the net, and because they can do whatever they want anonymously, they tend to go a bit crazy. So it doesn't really matter to me if you find me illogical, immature, etc, because the second I close this browser window you cease to exist.1. How does one's admittedly-biased opinion really affect the opinion of a game? If entertainment is truly subjective, how can we fault someone for coming up with a negative review?
Is this more of a testament to a lack of critical reading/listening skills? I probably should say that people don't lack those skills... but immediately drop them when they feel their personal identity is being attacked.A case of mistaking an attempt to entertain with something else, I feel. People see it as wrong because they misperceive it as some sort of organized attack on their opinion, as opposed to the satire that it really is. And attacking opinions is 'totally cool' on the internet. It's pretty much 90% of the activity on forums and blogs.2. Why is cherry-picking e-mail responses for the purpose of entertainment "wrong"? He's entertaining his intended audience. That's his job. Nintendo's job is to profit from entertainment, and thus will do what they can to appeal to their intended audience, so would they not be guilty of the same practice? Is Nintendo going to intentionally put in bad things in their game that would alienate their audience?
Not necessarily true. I am putting in my own personal thoughts between the questions, yes, but I seriously would like them to be answered, especially from the groups they're targeting. I could draw conclusions from the lack of serious responses to those questions others may provide, in which case it would support the "fuckwad" theory.Eh, I realized after the second question that you're not really asking questions of anyone at all, but instead framing your argument in the form of questions. But I had already started answering them, so here we are.Again, thank you all for the data, and thank you in advance to those who answer my questions. I have many more, but I figure I'll see what kind of responses happen from here on out before posting the next ones.
so you've gone to the extra effort to complain about people complaining about something you see as small? huh forgive my ignorance but if it isn't that important surely your comment is just as bad?woutervoorhees said:i can't believe that there are ppl fighting and flaming over a review
its so sad -_-
Maybe I'm jaded, but my expectation is you'll get few responses to your actual question. Not only are too many people too busy griefing each other or soap boxing, but it's generally hard to enlist the support of any forum community for any cause... Accept maybe griefing/soap boxing, as you see in Anonymous, or when Penny Arcade invaded that one zombie game.Tyrannus Argumentum said:Not necessarily true. I am putting in my own personal thoughts between the questions, yes, but I seriously would like them to be answered, especially from the groups they're targeting. I could draw conclusions from the lack of serious responses to those questions others may provide, in which case it would support the "fuckwad" theory.
I do this because part of my job is to analyze discourse between "competing" parties. Granted, my normal realm is intertribal conflict in African and South American communities... but gamers seem to have done well to set up virtual tribes of their own...
You're mixing 2 things up nowI disagree. The whole function of the word and is to connect different parts of a sentence together. The point of a full stop is to end a sentence and everything after that is a whole new sentence. By having a line that has goes '.and' your both disconnecting and trying to connect two different sentences at the same time
i dont really care that ppl are fighing over a reviewrightwingisgood said:so you've gone to the extra effort to complain about people complaining about something you see as small? huh forgive my ignorance but if it isn't that important surely your comment is just as bad?woutervoorhees said:i can't believe that there are ppl fighting and flaming over a review
its so sad -_-
Wii-fit is original I would say. Only because I refuse to defend a game I haven't played, unless I have some knowledge on that game.Xilam said:I must admit he does make a good point. I mean face it people nintendo (as much as I love them) do make shit games. Fact of life. Brawl is nothing but a bad melee clone. Instead of getting rid of the clone characters they added more and just copied everything again. Grow some originality nintendo. Also wise up all of those people that wrote in. Take the criticism with some dignity. All power to Yahtzee.
NickCaligo42 said:Okay, Yahtzee pissed me off with his Devil May Cry 4 review and all but completely lost my viewership with his Brawl review, then made me lose faith in the entire human race when he actually gave God of War a GOOD review when I was deeply hoping he'd rip it a new one
I think you CARE about what I think because you are willing to respond to it... dur.Patronizing said:Simon TR, why the hell do you think I CARE about what you think?
I come to Yahtzee's site to see his brutally honest reviews of videogames, and if he destroys the pathetic arguments of a few nintendo fanboys, so much the better. The game was overrated, and I'm been a Nintendo fan for longer than most of these recent nintendo fanboys have been alive.
And Simon, answer your own question, why the hell are YOU here, if you don't like Yahtzee's humor?
So you're saying only the popular onions matter, and everyone else should just shut up and agree with Yahtzee? Who's the loser, really.Patronizing said:At the end of the day, the internet losers with nothing better to do will endlessly discuss something like this.
The reality is thus: people CARE about what Yahtzee says, and they DON'T CARE about what YOU say.
Do thousands upon thousands of people come to YOUR site to see what YOUR opinion of a game is?
NO. So shut the hell up and keep your worthless,insignificant opinions to yourself.
I'd rather be a retarded winner than a retarded loser. ; )Stjimmy888 said:you are for thinking you can gain something by fighting on the internet. you know what they say about winning an internet fight.So you're saying only the popular onions matter, and everyone else should just shut up and agree with Yahtzee? Who's the loser, really.