Zero Punctuation: Silent Hill: Downpour

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
You know what would be a creative use of the Silent Hill franchise? Having a game in which the character already escaped/passed through silent hill, and has gotten back into the real world before the game begins. From there, you control a character who slowly discovers that silent hill has "followed" him into the seemingly safe, populated cities and a bucolic countrysides.

That way, you can contrast the muggy horror of the previous games with an uncommon horror setting. You walk through a busy town market, only to see the other pedestrians transform into shadowy monsters that follow you. You enjoy a nice sunset in a meadow, which suddenly becomes thick with fog. You can capture a real sense of PTSD, only one which chases you and kills you with hooks and acid.
 

Grahav

New member
Mar 13, 2009
1,129
0
0
Best point of the video is the need of a new horror line. We already know how the town works, so
much of the suspense is dead.
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
Thanks for including Sonic Adventure 2 in the burning pile of shitty Sonic games. Sonic Adventure 2 sucked ass, and was really the point for me where all of Sonic's games went to shit. I will never understand why people rave about that game, it's awful.

And yeah, like Yahtzee says he can't really call himself a Silent Hill fan anymore, for the same reasons I no longer consider myself a Sonic fan. So everyone who just had their panties bunch up over the preceding paragraph can take their "you're one of those fans" comments and shove 'em. I can't be one of "those fans" when I'm not a fan at all.
 

FallenMessiah88

So fucking thrilled to be here!
Jan 8, 2010
470
0
0
So it's one step forward, two steps back eh? Well, maybe Vatra Games will get it right next time? That is, if there will even be a next time. I certainly hope so.
 

Nazrel

New member
May 16, 2008
284
0
0
Yopaz said:
Nazrel said:
Yopaz said:
I am surprised to hear him say positive things about this game since from what I have seen from other reviews there's been a lot of negative things that have been mentioned. Still his general opinion of the game seemed to indicate that he didn't like it very much so *I think I might give this one a miss.
If you read the details, the complaints in most reviews amount to "This sucks because it's a survival horror game." without the writer realizing that's what they're complaining about... and some choppiness in the Xbox version... and all but 3 monsters looking pretty generic.
Actually I have read reviews complaining about the combat, the story and the environment, but thanks for pointing out that I have read different reviews than you.
I would have shrugged and said "fair enough"... but you brought up the combat, showing you have no idea what I was talking about. I guess I could have been clearer... but given this is a forum for a video that explains a least the combat part of that concept... I really shouldn't have had to.

The disempowerment of the player is a major aspect of Survival horror; I looked through as many reviews as I could find and this aspect factored heavily into the complaints of quite a lot of them, oblivious to the fact this is a defining characteristic of the genre.

For the sake of accuracy I guess I really should have said "many complaints in most reviews."

I assume they're confusing things like "Dead Space" and "Left 4 Dead" with survival horror.

Whether we read the same reviews or not is irrelevant, because it doesn't discount the trend.
 

A Gray Phantom

New member
Mar 4, 2011
40
0
0
Minecraft is scary than most survival horror games I've played. Why? Because I actually have something worth losing, and creepers are like freakin' kamikaze ninjas 0_o;
 

Bluecho

New member
Dec 30, 2010
171
0
0
I think the problem lies it this game simply trying to be a Silent Hill game, and failing miserably. Which isn't hard to do, since they're damn good games (or were at least), and it's hard to replicate the magic so many years later, especially since the replication process is in the hands of people that had entirely different world views than the original games.

Also, I've only seen some scenes of the monsters, but most of them look like dirty people, not grotesque shambling monstrocities with heavy symbolic meaning. Yahtzee is right, they just look like dudes. You can quantify dudes, even reason with them. Monsters from the original games most certainly weren't just dudes.
 

RobfromtheGulag

New member
May 18, 2010
931
0
0
I'm going to go against the seemingly accepted norm here and say Silent Hill 1 was the most frightening. Anyway, 2 was nice in that it was not a cut & paste sequel, it was good on its own merits, for different reasons. 3 was still good, but revisiting previous game content, this time with an Uzi [how does one find an Uzi in small town America?] was the writing on the wall imo. 4 was a mishmosh, I think I read somewhere it initially wasn't even going to be a SH game until Konami decided to draw on the cash cow franchise theme. After that... shudder. I've run out of loyalty, I'm not buying them anymore. Bought Homecoming, it was awful. Bought Origins, had an argument with a friend who thought it was the 2nd coming (I did not). Bought Shattered Memories, which, although good (imo), was outside cannon as it were, and was not frightening. It was like one of those novels in a game, the only reason you play is for the sub-par story.

I do believe there were some phone games awhile back though, perhaps Japanese only. If someone has played those it'd be interesting to hear their take on them.
 

Thaius

New member
Mar 5, 2008
3,862
0
0
Interesting how when he reviewed Heavy Rain he was disappointed that the killer was the same in each playthrough, but in this he says that the difference in the protagonist's backstory cheapens the whole experience. Are we being hypocritical, or finally realizing how stupid the statement about Heavy Rain was in the first place?
 

HeroKing89

New member
Nov 9, 2009
45
0
0
Yeah Yahtzee I don't think you are SH fan much either but you really don't like the other three ones that started the series either. The thing of it is every game compared to SH2 is going to look bad because SH2 is on a whole other level then most games in general.

Either way I have to say Downpour scared me much much more then SH2. SH2 is actually one of the least scariest of the games and rarely does anything freightning. Plus it is incredibly formulaic. Go into a building, beat up some dudes 1... 2... find a key item and beat up more dudes who spawn as a result of them 3... 4... figure out the puzzle and fight a boss 5... 6...

Plus SH2 never had ammo scarcity problems and you can carry a whole aresenal of ammo through out the entire game. I mean really as soon as you pick up the pistol you never need to use anything else until you get about 20 rounds of the shotgun then you can use that for the rest of the game instead.

Also the otherworld of SH2 is too mundane. Most of the time it is the same world just with a new paint job this time rust colored. You talk alot about dingy brown shooters but there is something to be said of the monotony created from grayish rusty corridors of SH games in general. What is good about the otherworld of downpour is that it actually FEELS otherworldly while retaining a sense of space about where you are unlike in others which is just the same world with a different coat of paint.

As good as SH2's narrative is, it just has a lot of other bugger all issues that get in the way. The endless supply of ammo and health drinks the game hands you kills any sense of danger one may have in the game. Most of the monsters are terribly slow and do very little damage anyway. The main variety is also rather lacking with one of the bosses almost copy and pasted for the final boss fight with one or two new attacks. It reeks of lazy design. Also you could literally cut out the first half of SH2 and almost be nonethewiser except for a few character introductions. Also Let's not forget the completely arbitrary fetch quest thing SH2 makes you go through after the end of the hospital so you can get a wrench to get a key to get into the oh christ you already know what it is.
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
Balkan said:
Hey yahtzee wasnt the thing with who is the murderer THE RESON why you didnt like Heavy Rain ?
The thing with the plot staying the same I mean .
And the goal of Murphy is to get out of SH
I haven't played either game but wasn't Heavy Rain a murder mystery type game not survival horror? I imagine that the different genre is the reason for the inconsistency.
 

HeroKing89

New member
Nov 9, 2009
45
0
0
Yeah it was weird Yahtzee says that Murphy could just skip town but the entire point of the narrative was to escape town. He was trying to do so the entire time so obviously couldn't just hop the fence and run...
 

Sanmei

New member
Aug 11, 2010
11
0
0
Western developer? Vatra is based in Brno, of the Czech Republic. Guess that's still "west" to Australia, but...
 

Luca72

New member
Dec 6, 2011
527
0
0
Does anyone else get the feeling that it's nearly impossible to be scared when you're EXPECTING to get scared? It's like when you see a trailer for a slasher film, and you know the redhead standing next to the window is going to get jacked because it shows it at the end. When she backs up next to said window in the movie, you know what's about to happen.

Silent Hill doesn't run so much on jump scares, but we've come to expect a certain type of dread, a creepy town that gets all rusty and burned sometimes, and vaguely humanoid distortions that represent something bad in the protagonists past. I'm saying there's a certain expectation for how Silent Hill should feel, and that makes it impossible to get a pure experience from it. I wouldn't be surprised if people who have no idea what Silent Hill is, but played Downpour anyway, liked it. To them it's something new.

So let's let this one die off, and bag up all the people that seemed to know what they were doing in this series and get a new IP.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
Nazrel said:
Yopaz said:
Nazrel said:
Yopaz said:
I am surprised to hear him say positive things about this game since from what I have seen from other reviews there's been a lot of negative things that have been mentioned. Still his general opinion of the game seemed to indicate that he didn't like it very much so *I think I might give this one a miss.
If you read the details, the complaints in most reviews amount to "This sucks because it's a survival horror game." without the writer realizing that's what they're complaining about... and some choppiness in the Xbox version... and all but 3 monsters looking pretty generic.
Actually I have read reviews complaining about the combat, the story and the environment, but thanks for pointing out that I have read different reviews than you.
I would have shrugged and said "fair enough"... but you brought up the combat, showing you have no idea what I was talking about. I guess I could have been clearer... but given this is a forum for a video that explains a least the combat part of that concept... I really shouldn't have had to.

The disempowerment of the player is a major aspect of Survival horror; I looked through as many reviews as I could find and this aspect factored heavily into the complaints of quite a lot of them, oblivious to the fact this is a defining characteristic of the genre.

For the sake of accuracy I guess I really should have said "many complaints in most reviews."

I assume they're confusing things like "Dead Space" and "Left 4 Dead" with survival horror.

Whether we read the same reviews or not is irrelevant, because it doesn't discount the trend.
Bad combat is not a defining feature, but you're right, it's a trend. Emphasizing survival by any means necessary, make even generic monsters hard to beat in order to keep the tension up.

However bad story is not a defining feature for a survival horror. When someone reviews a survival horror game and complains about the story they are not complaining about the game being a survival horror game.

Also the environment is fucking essential for a survival horror game. When they are complaining about that being bad they are complaining about the game NOT being a survival horror game.

In short, 2 of 3 of the complaints I have seen have not been a defining point for survival horror thus not all complaints are about the game being a survival horror.
 

Creatural

New member
Nov 19, 2009
31
0
0
I think the biggest problem with this game is still the monsters. No, you don't have to make your monsters look inhuman for them to be scary, but having them still too similar to ordinary people is going to be a problem in an other worldly setting. You can easily overcome this by making the behavior or the body language off in a really nasty way, but this game didn't do that.

In SH2 where it had monsters that were similar to humans they made the walking simulations for the monsters just a little off and didn't have them behave quite right while they still had a definite purpose. The monsters in Downpour don't feel like they have a purpose (when they're humanized), they have a pattern definitely, but no purpose, no goal like some of the previous monsters. It makes them too normal. Also, this might sound contradictory, but the monsters of Downpour are way too easy to predict. Monsters in previous games had at least a few different ways to respond to the player and sneak up on them, they were still definitely within their behavioral confines, but they didn't just feel like they were kind of harmlessly robotic.

Another way they could have maybe made the monsters scarier is just do what they did with scariest monsters in the past games, take away their face. If you have a creature that is mostly human but you obscure its face it becomes scarier, because a lot of the feelings we read on other people (if we've not lost our eye sight) come from judging their facial expressions. If you can't see that you took a lot of knowledge away from the player and being without it usually scares people.

There's a greater problem with the monsters in that a good portion of them don't relate to Murhpy's psychology (though not all thankfully, which does make it better than Homecoming which had a higher ratio of monsters not related to the main character's personal problems). If the monsters had related back to him more without him having to almost directly tell us what the problem was they could have been far more interesting and scary. But, as Yahtzee pointed out, that is problematic to work with because Murphy's past basically changes with each ending. One solid past would have been good for this.

If the monsters alone were improved I think I could have forgiven most everything else in the game, like the exploration being less interesting than it was in other games that allowed for it, the NPCs being too there so you didn't feel entirely alone while not getting to know them at all (previous NPCs made you feel more isolated by being creepy, more distant, or judgmental/against you), or the terrible controls and item direction. As it is the only thing that really works, with it being a Silent Hill game, are the other world environments. They also could have used more work, but they were at least interesting and occasionally threatening.

That's not to say this is the worst game ever (or all that close), but considering what type of game this is supposed to be and what series it's supposed to be in it needs a lot more work.
 

Aisaku

New member
Jul 9, 2010
445
0
0
beetrain said:
I'd like Yahtzee to take a look at Lone Survivor, an indie horror game Jim Sterling described as "More Silent Hill than Silent Hill".

http://www.lonesurvivor.co.uk/

TheYeIIowDucK said:
Is it just me or does Yahtzee review Silent Hill games way too often?
You mean, when they come out?
This guy is off his rocker if he thinks people will pay $40 USD for a game beta. His game better be damn good.

Also, I did like downpour... yes it did not have the dread and sense of impending doom that other silent hill titles had but damn, was it blood pumping to run from the critters.
 

Creatural

New member
Nov 19, 2009
31
0
0
Aisaku said:
beetrain said:
I'd like Yahtzee to take a look at Lone Survivor, an indie horror game Jim Sterling described as "More Silent Hill than Silent Hill".

http://www.lonesurvivor.co.uk/

TheYeIIowDucK said:
Is it just me or does Yahtzee review Silent Hill games way too often?
You mean, when they come out?
This guy is off his rocker if he thinks people will pay $40 USD for a game beta. His game better be damn good.

Also, I did like downpour... yes it did not have the dread and sense of impending doom that other silent hill titles had but damn, was it blood pumping to run from the critters.
Wait a minute. I got that game for ten dollars, did you look at the side with OST and stuff only or is this guy now literally only selling the more expensive version of the game? Please don't be the second one.
 

Aisaku

New member
Jul 9, 2010
445
0
0
Creatural said:
Aisaku said:
beetrain said:
I'd like Yahtzee to take a look at Lone Survivor, an indie horror game Jim Sterling described as "More Silent Hill than Silent Hill".

http://www.lonesurvivor.co.uk/

TheYeIIowDucK said:
Is it just me or does Yahtzee review Silent Hill games way too often?
You mean, when they come out?
This guy is off his rocker if he thinks people will pay $40 USD for a game beta. His game better be damn good.

Also, I did like downpour... yes it did not have the dread and sense of impending doom that other silent hill titles had but damn, was it blood pumping to run from the critters.
Wait a minute. I got that game for ten dollars, did you look at the side with OST and stuff only or is this guy now literally only selling the more expensive version of the game? Please don't be the second one.
Well, it seems that the biggger package contains what you say, plus the beta to the '3D' version of the game, whatever that means these days. In the future he may as well sell the full '3D' version of the game at $50 USD or so I gather. Sorry if I was unclear.