pewbes said:
hi all, newbie / newfag reporting to his first post!
i think what most of the guys in here forget (over 1100 posts, jesus tabdancing christ!) is that this is more comedy than actual professional game review (no offense, and no i dont think that sites like gametrailers or gamespot are doing a better job either since thats honestly asskissing) so whats so amusing about the zero punctuation series, in my opinion, is that it works like the darker, pissed off brother of gamespot who invites us into his basement to a mountain dew, and a newsflash how the world of gaming sucks. which is perfect entertainment! but not better gamereviewing than asskissing games.
so that thing aside, what the hell is the definition of a fanboy? from urban dictionary i can qoute the closest to what Yahtzee is referring to: "A person who is completely loyal to a game or company reguardless of if they suck or not." so, yes in his eyes people who like ssbb are fanboys/girls. because he thinks that the game sucks. but if i would say: 'i think portal sucks major balls!' that would make mr Croshaw a fanboy, since he cant accept that the game sucks, even if i defined in bad in my opinion. you may now go 'Yea okay, but only you think the game sucks! that doesn't make him a fanboy!' - BINGO, its a subjective matter wherever a game sucks or not. which makes the 'he is a fanboy!' only exist in your narrow human skulls. and furthermore it... why the hell do i argue with you?...
After a few minutes understanding what you're saying (sorry, but it's true), I'd have to say that I agree with you for the most part.
However, your definition of a fanboy is a bit off. Urban Dictionary, you said, defined a fanboy as "A person who is completely loyal to a game or company reguardless of if they suck or not." This, however, doesn't mean that fanboys only exist for games people think are bad. Rather, they exist for all games, bad or good. Every game has fanboys (with the exception of games based off reality TV. Maybe).
Thus, your argument that, if you hate Portal, people who don't are fanboys, is rendered obsolete. Fanboyism isn't subjective in the least. What IS subjective, yes, is the quality of a game, and a person's opinion of said game.
I watch ZP knowing that it's one man's opinion. Occasionally, I agree with him about things. Occasionally, I don't. It's not a review as such: it's an opinion piece.
While writing this post, I had a slight epiphany: all reviews are opinion pieces. The difference is that, for the most part, professional reviews (ie those in videogame magazines and the like) are done by people who enjoy the genre closest to that of the game they're reviewing, whereas Yahtzee (third time to type it correctly!) has to review games from all genres. Thus, his reviews may, on occasion, be negative, because he's reviewing a game-type he's none-too-fond of.
What all this boils down to is this: fanboyism isn't subjective, quality of game is; all reviews are opinion pieces; this thread has gone on too fscking long.