Zero Punctuation: Torchlight

Nalgas D. Lemur

New member
Nov 20, 2009
1,318
0
0
njsykora said:
Also the girl is pretty much useless, as are all bow-wielders without some support which you can't get since this is single player only.
Seriously? It's pretty widely accepted that she's easy mode (although Torchlight is ridiculously easy to begin with, and anyone who's ever used a keyboard and mouse before should probably start on at least hard). You don't need any support once you get up a few levels and get the exploding shot that flattens entire rooms in a few hits. From there on, you just march through the game firing off a bunch of those ahead of you whenever you enter a room/new area, and everything dies, no questions asked. You don't need any other skills or spells or anything, or even your pet.

This review does have some good points about the kinds of things that can get annoying in the game. It's by no means perfect; I'd say good (if you're into that sort of thing), but not great. Oddly enough, I always hated the Diablo games, but I was at least entertained enough by Torchlight to play it through once, and it was worth the sale price. I wouldn't pay the regular price of $20 for it, but that's what Steam weekend/holiday sales are for. Titan Quest is still my favorite hack and slash, though.
 
Jan 22, 2008
88
0
0
I hope so. It seems like the sort of game he might like, since it's Diablo With Guns, but it has so much style, doesnt take itself seriously, and has a decent (if reference-based) level of writing.

Next, week, I hope.
 

yourbeliefs

Bored at Work
Jan 30, 2009
781
0
0
Funny review as usual. Don't agree with his assessment of it. I got it off the Steam sale (sadly at $10 instead of $5) and haven't regretted the purchase. I installed it on my home PC and my work laptop (which, thanks to the pitiful system requirements runs quite well) and thanks to cloud saving I can basically play it wherever I want.

If you haven't played the game, try out the demo. It is worth it, unless you do not like Diablo or Diablo-type games, because at times TL just feels like a very sophisticated Diablo Mod.
 

dirkdeldiablo

New member
Feb 11, 2009
21
0
0
I personally liked that the review addressed my own personal relationship with Torchlight. I remember downloading the demo, then saying to myself, "Well, gee, it's a nice enough little game, but do I want to pay 20 bucks for a shinier, fresher incarnation of the exact same game I've played a half-dozen times through?" And then there was the Steam holiday sale, which is the entire reason I own Torchlight. And Audiosurf, Painkiller, and a big bulging pack of adventure games, come to think of it, but now I've strayed off topic.

I'd argue that this game was significantly more rewarding than an ice cream sandwich (for the price), but I also immediately installed a mod that re-skinned the warrior class as a blood-covered Brock Samson, so I suppose the full credit for my enthusiasm must be split among the game proper, the editor tools, and the fan community.
 

PxDn Ninja

New member
Jan 30, 2008
839
0
0
I gotta agree with the review this week completely. Torchlight is really just a copy of Diablo, with all the flaws, but just like Diablo I got four dollars of fun out of it.
 

BonsaiK

Music Industry Corporate Whore
Nov 14, 2007
5,635
0
0
coldalarm said:
BonsaiK said:
It's official, Yahtzee does not like Torchlight, he has no soul.

While most of what he says is just his opinion and therefore neither here nor there (although the fact he didn't find the interface very intuitive amazes me), he actually got one important part of the review drastically, unforgivably wrong - you don't have to click for each attack, you can hold down the mouse button and your character will keep attacking the same enemy until it dies. Even if you're no longer hovering your mouse pointer over it. This is actually one of the most meaningful improvements the game has over Diablo - it's far less of a click-fest in so many ways. He's sure getting sloppy, gone are the days of stuff like the Bioshock review where he actually honed in very precisely on what was really wrong with the game. I guess a couple years' worth of deadlines must finally be getting to him. I think he needs a couple of months off.
Agreed. I have to say I was left unimpressed by that review, and not just because I'm a Torchlight fan.

Compared to current RPGs (that is Dragon Age: Origins, Neverwinter Nights I suppose, Borderlands, Fallout 3, Mass Effect, Drakensang, Oblivion and the swathe of MMORPGs), Torchlight is a standout title. It's got a low selling price, it's got functional graphics that aren't ridiculous, it's easy enough to understand (although I'd say the itemisation is a bit messy), and it's fun.

I have paid more for games I've played for less than Torchlight. There are no Dungeon Running games that I can think of that are as recent or as successful as Torchlight, at least not since the days of Diablo 2. It's a back-to-basics game (as Yahtzee pointed out) that manages to not suck. It's proof that indie games can do extremely well and that you don't need to stay modern to do well.
Torchlight does has flaws, but certainly not any of the flaws that Yahtzee pointed out. The interface is brilliant, the design is amazingly thoughtful (the pet that sells your items for you will be appreciated by any Diablo fan), the game is certainly bloody hard enough on Very Hard Hardcore, and I still can't get over how he missed that whole "hold the button down to continuously attack" thing - you'd think someone who hates clicking as much as he claims to would have found that out almost straight away. It's as if he just wasn't paying attention. One of the game's loading messages even mentions this feature!

I would have liked to see him spending less time making dumb jokes about the economies of small towns over conveniently-placed pits of hell (his point being that the plot is contrived, we get it - but since when are Action RPGs ever about the plot?) and more time actually dissecting the game. It almost feels like he padded the review out with that stuff at the start just to add some fluff so people wouldn't notice that he hadn't actually really analysed the gameplay much.

At least Torchlight doesn't have any multiplayer for him to ignore.
 

wolf_isthebest

the Insane
Mar 4, 2009
103
0
0
BonsaiK said:
It's official, Yahtzee does not like Torchlight, he has no soul.

While most of what he says is just his opinion and therefore neither here nor there (although the fact he didn't find the interface very intuitive amazes me), he actually got one important part of the review drastically, unforgivably wrong - you don't have to click for each attack, you can hold down the mouse button and your character will keep attacking the same enemy until it dies. Even if you're no longer hovering your mouse pointer over it. This is actually one of the most meaningful improvements the game has over Diablo - it's far less of a click-fest in so many ways. He's sure getting sloppy, gone are the days of stuff like the Bioshock review where he actually honed in very precisely on what was really wrong with the game. I guess a couple years' worth of deadlines must finally be getting to him. I think he needs a couple of months off.
I agree completely. This is the 3rd game review, after the DMC4 and GTA4, when i find Yahtzee tearing apart games that I enjoyed. I know his hole jig is to ***** about games and most of the time he is right. But when you see him going on a nerd and swear rage about small stuff, like mouse clicking and the npc not moving around(like that would enhance the experience of a HACK AND SLASH game...), just makes it more sad then funny. Best 3 euros i ever spent on a game ! After Team Fortress 2 ofc.
 

Sentient6

New member
Nov 26, 2009
212
0
0
I dunno... The review was good, but it wasn't as funny as some of the others... It just grinded a lot of the same points Yahtzee complained about in prev games. Raises the question of "why did he need to review it?", especially with games like Bayonetta and Darksiders out. But I guess it will be a while until they get to Australia...
 

Spinwhiz

New member
Oct 8, 2007
2,871
0
0
GrinningManiac said:
Spinwhiz said:
WestMountain said:
Why didnt those first guys get banned for commenting that early?
Patience Grasshopper.

Hee Hee. I know this is completely unrelated, but did anyone ever tell you how funny your avatar is? I dunno, it's the nose poking out, but it makes me giggle. Sorry for the interruption
Thank you very much :)
 

Gvaz

New member
Sep 8, 2008
24
0
0
You DO know you can hold the fucking mouse button down and you dont have to click so much?

Fighting against hordes of enemies is the whole point imo.

played as the archer and just aggro'd everything and then explosive shot the whole room to death, fun.

Sure the identifying gets old, but the game throws so much at you that it doesnt matter.

Plus, it looks like wow because *gasp* it was made by creators of Diablo and Fate. GO FIGURE.

The interface is actually quite nice. It's easy to use, and simple containing (wow!) 4 hotkeys plus a changable right click special.

qq more yahtzee
 

SpiritMacardi

New member
Feb 4, 2008
51
0
0
Even though I absolutely loved Torchlight, I still thought this review was funny. Though I'm curious why Yahtzee is reviewing it now as opposed to last year when it was still new.
 

Zefar

New member
May 11, 2009
485
0
0
You think it's easy? Try killing the last boss without dieing with Alchemist.

Trust me, it's bloody hard. Unless you have Uber upgraded gear from that Enchanter guy.

Nice review though.
 

silensay

New member
Nov 12, 2009
17
0
0
Yahtzee, I think I can save you a week's worth of work with my current idea.

Simply use this same review next week, but replace every occurrence of the word "torchlight" with the word "diablo" and slightly modify a couple of segments to suit it as a diablo review.

Repetitive hordes? Excessive clicking? Gnats dropping iron helmets? Yeah, I think my idea is valid enough.
 

UnravThreads

New member
Aug 10, 2009
809
0
0
snowplow said:
I'd say the reason he "padded" the review was because there wasn't much to review in the first place.

I agree with Yahtzee almost entirely. I played on the hardest difficulty as the woman, which was fun for a while but then it just became so BORING and EASY. I constantly had to sell potions and scrolls because they dropped so frequently, and the vast majority of the items dropped by monsters sucked. Identifying them all was so tedious, and there were so many of them my shitty pet had to take multiple trips. Usually by the time he got back in the midlevels (3 mins?) I had a full inventory of trash AGAIN. Also, aside from the occasional cosmetic changes, the levels were practically the same. I only got to level 16 I believe, then I quit, but I only remember 4 maps: Mines, dungeon, water ruins, the levels after water ruins. Seriously, too repetitive.

The game wasn't bad, in fact It was addictive at first, but it just got boring for me. I did like the feature where you can feed fish to your pet to transform him, but the game was so easy I never actually used it besides seeing what he transformed into. If he got into trouble I just gave him some of my 40+ potions and he continued to tank or whatever.
What did you expect? It's a dungeon crawler.

If I could apply tweaks to it, I'd reduce the droprate of potions and possibly town portal scrolls. The Identify Scrolls are incredibly useful but I don't think they should cost an inventory spot. I've only used the Hunter-esque character, so I can't speak for the others however.

Yahtzee didn't even really mention the fishing in his review, which I only just realised. I found it quite a nice change from mass murder.