fierydemise said:
4) A quick plug for one of my favorite webcomics, Dresden Codak [http://dresdencodak.com/index.html]. The artwork is beautiful and the comic manages to do both serious and funny relatively well.
I've been holding in this rant for a while, so apologies in advance:
Dresden Codak doesn't do serious and funny well. It does funny quite well, but so far it's failed at serious.
In the early strips, it just just a silly, rather pointless comic. It worked. Sure, it made little sense, but it still managed to be funny. A silly, wacky comic that was funny worked. I feel I should draw a comparison to the comic Minus [http://www.kiwisbybeat.com/minus.html], which had a similar shtick.
But then came the DRAMA?, which so far has failed miserably. There are several reasons for this, but by far the biggest is the following:
The characters have no real personality. None. I'd actually say that Ctrl+Alt+Del has better characterization than Dresden Codak. Now, this was okay earlier on. Again, the purpose of the comic was to be silly and wacky; it didn't matter if the characters had no personality, they were just vehicles for the silliness. However, you can't suddenly take these personality-less characters and somehow expect us to care about them in the DRAMA?. The "plot" arc hasn't added any more characterization to them except for some parts of Kimiko's past, which is hardly characterization at all. Throwing in some kind of angsty past for a character CAN work if their personality has been established and the author thinks that giving them a REASON for why they're like that might be a good idea. Example: Batman. Yes, his parents died before his eyes. That does not characterization make. The fact that he decided to try to prevent it from happening to anyone else by becoming Batman is EXCELLENT characterization. The bottom line: There is less characterization in Dresden Codak than there is in Ctrl+Alt+Del. It's simply impossible to care about the characters when they have no personality. This can work if the comic is just silly and episodic, but when you try to insert DRAMA? you'd better have some personality.
Earlier I compared Dresden Codak to Minus. Minus also has no characterization for the characters. At most, a character's entire personality might be an emotion, like "angry guy". But Minus was never about the plot, the characters, or anything other than just being wacky and silly. That's not to say I wouldn't mind a little more characterization, but strictly speaking it doesn't need it.
At its root, that is Dresden Codak's problem. It's not just the painfully bad exposition [http://www.dresdencodak.com/cartoons/dc_041.html]. It's not just the fact that I can't care about the plot because it makes only marginally more sense than the earlier strips; I can take it not making sense of it's funny, I can't take it not making sense if it doesn't even have the humor to make up for it. It's not that the comic strip has one of the worst update schedules I've ever seen (and this is AFTER the author made a big announcement about how he was making it his full-time job and said he would go on a weekly schedule; quite frankly, the schedule is about as erratic as it was before that announcement). The problem is simply the fact that I can't care about the characters at all due to their lack of any sort of personality, and thus I don't care about the story.
Again, Dresden Codak was quite good earlier on. But it's lost what drew me to it (the crazy humor) and has instead inserted a plot that I really can't find myself caring much about. Take note, everyone: When you enter Cerebus Syndrome, don't lose what make the comic good in the first place.
I WOULD, however, recommend reading the pro-Hob strips. And the artwork IS quite good.
Rant over. Sorry for wasting your time with something only marginally related to the topic.