I've been wondering... people tend to get on CAD's case for using a lot of copy/paste set pieces for creating characters. I see a lot of other webcomics do this to greater or lesser extents (and, really, is it substantially different than the pose sheets that traditional comic artists and animators use?).
Then I remember that this is on the Zero Punctuation site and, more importantly, Yahtzee himself has made quite a few complaints about how Tim Buckley's art style in his comic has not evolved over the years. With that in mind, does anyone imagine that ZP's art style is going to evolve? It seems to be firmly locked into its deliberately simplistic format. Personally, I think it's brilliant, which I wouldn't say about the style used for CAD (should be noted that Buckley can draw far better than his comic suggests), but suppose this feature is still going strong 5 years from now. I can only wonder when an even more vitriolic upstart will appear to say "Zero Punctuation? It's been the same pill-shaped copy/paste art since day one. How can anyone consider that relevant or laudable?"
Then I remember that this is on the Zero Punctuation site and, more importantly, Yahtzee himself has made quite a few complaints about how Tim Buckley's art style in his comic has not evolved over the years. With that in mind, does anyone imagine that ZP's art style is going to evolve? It seems to be firmly locked into its deliberately simplistic format. Personally, I think it's brilliant, which I wouldn't say about the style used for CAD (should be noted that Buckley can draw far better than his comic suggests), but suppose this feature is still going strong 5 years from now. I can only wonder when an even more vitriolic upstart will appear to say "Zero Punctuation? It's been the same pill-shaped copy/paste art since day one. How can anyone consider that relevant or laudable?"