Something something false flag, something something Antifa thugs, something something arrest the victim.
Crazy biatch! Good luck running for governor now.
I have no idea, but I suspect it's not going to end well for Labour.Does the smear campaign against Ken Loach count as "woke" or "anti-woke"?
Woke, He's being smeared as an Anti-Semite for supporting some of those kicked fro Labour who were also kicked under claims they were Anti-Semites (some were admittedly but others it was more bad PR moves on their part which happened to be linked to Anti-Semite like speaking at certain event or on about certain topics etc.)Does the smear campaign against Ken Loach count as "woke" or "anti-woke"?
Because the one thing we learnt from the Palestine-Israel conflict earlier this year is that conservatives would NEVER call someone a antisemitic...Woke, He's being smeared as an Anti-Semite for supporting some of those kicked fro Labour who were also kicked under claims they were Anti-Semites (some were admittedly but others it was more bad PR moves on their part which happened to be linked to Anti-Semite like speaking at certain event or on about certain topics etc.)
It belies their greatest belief and fear: That it is the God-given right of the majority to tyrannize the minority, and "they'll do it to us just like we did it to them!".TLDV; US conservatives talk all the time about how minorities get treated exactly the same as the majority in the US.
If this is true, you should have absolutely no concerns about white men being a minority.
In this case it's not some nefarious conservative plot (though when is it normally anyway?). It's been Labour officials making such claims for many years even before Corbyn was elected he was being accused of it by others in the Labour party and suggested that's one of the reasons he shouldn't become leader.Because the one thing we learnt from the Palestine-Israel conflict earlier this year is that conservatives would NEVER call someone a antisemitic...
Oh, wait. We're not in a fairy land. Of course, they would use the term antisemitism just to attack political opponents.
Anyways - me personally, I think it's centrist (in this case, of the Labour party) not either end of the spectrum. They're very good at using one sides call outs to attack the other side and then smear the first side for being mean (when they did nothing.) Classic Clinton move
Corbyn is usually seen as left in Labour and the attack againdy him was done by the right of the Labour party. I.e. centrist.In this case it's not some nefarious conservative plot (though when is it normally anyway?). It's been Labour officials making such claims for many years even before Corbyn was elected he was being accused of it by others in the Labour party and suggested that's one of the reasons he shouldn't become leader.
It requires a very simple solution in the first place. Stop terrorising people.It belies their greatest belief and fear: That it is the God-given right of the majority to tyrannize the minority, and "they'll do it to us just like we did it to them!".
I wonder when people will stop using the word minorities.TLDV; US conservatives talk all the time about how minorities get treated exactly the same as the majority in the US.
If this is true, you should have absolutely no concerns about white men being a minority.
Any concerns about this just shows how you've been lying about how minorities actually get treated in the US
Never. Colorblindness (or its equivalent) simply reinforces tyranny of the majority. Even if all prejudice were eliminated and its downstream affects compensated for, acknowledging and celebrating diversity is a worthwhile goal in and of itself. Minority religions, cultures, and heritages should not need to be subsumed into the majority to be valid.I mean that in a general way. When are people going to stop referring to people by the percentage their skin color / religion / culture / heritage is represented in the country?
In a way, I sort of get Labour's thing here. It's control over its traditional working class heartlands of industrial cities has long been slipping. It is obsessed with recovering them, and frankly, Corbynism accelerated the fall.Corbyn is usually seen as left in Labour and the attack againdy him was done by the right of the Labour party. I.e. centrist.
Soon as non-Hispanic white people become a minority in the US, it will beI'm actually rather surprised that this hasn't been designated a slur yet because in 99% of conversations, referencing people in such a manner adds nothing to the conversation.
Yeh but woke types generally mock centrists as fence sitters or secret conservatives anyway. They don't normally out people or try to throw them under the bus for not echoing the right narrative to look good.Corbyn is usually seen as left in Labour and the attack againdy him was done by the right of the Labour party. I.e. centrist.
No, I dont think it was a conservative plot. Hence me pointing out centrist and them possibly doing it to Loach too
I think Labour need to split but be willing to form coalition parties and support proportional representation; the divide between the left and the right of the party is just too large. I'm on the left of the party, and some of the things the right of the party (which is the current leadership) come out with is making it a hard ask to vote for them. At least in a coalition I'd feel their worst tendencies were mitigated by the coalition, whereas if I have to vote Labour right now I'm supporting those tendencies purely through lack of other options, and I'm not sure I'll do that.The issue I would bring up is whether Labour shouldn't simply recalibrate towards the sorts of voters Corbyn enthused and just accept their traditional base is no longer theirs. All those "young people" are in fact workers too, and often not well paid. Repay them with some loyalty, they might be Labour's for a lifetime. Instead, Labour has effectively invited them to go and embrace apathy or another party for the dubious aim of recovering its historical voters. But in a way it doesn't matter what it does, because it will be pounded into rubble not only by the right-wing media, but the half of its own media that opposes whichever poor sod is running it at the time.
The problem is that If Labour splits, that means a Tory government pretty much forever under our first past the post system, leaving them free to do as they please like scrap the NHS, sell out to the USA for a trade deal, and generally make the UK (England and Wales, by then) a wonderland for international finance and a hole for most of its own citizens.I think Labour need to split but be willing to form coalition parties and support proportional representation; the divide between the left and the right of the party is just too large.
I feel this is more or less an issue either way TBH. If I didn't have other constraints I'd look more seriously at leaving, but /shrug.The problem is that If Labour splits, that means a Tory government pretty much forever under our first past the post system, leaving them free to do as they please like scrap the NHS, sell out to the USA for a trade deal, and generally make the UK (England and Wales, by then) a wonderland for international finance and a hole for most of its own citizens.