Actually I do have a question in that regard. Because one of the writer's complaints is that Frey's origin is too stereo-typically "black", she is basically too "from the streets". But wouldn't that make her more relatable? I mean if they gave her a Fresh Prince of Bel Air backstory would they turn around and complain that her experience is white-washed?
Just because someone's from "da streets" does not automatically make them more relatable to Black people. That's one of those stereotypes I was talking about. That's one has been used too many times in movies, tvs, and games. Movies and TV especially are finally around getting away from that. Kevin Hart is making movies and acting in movies that shows black people don't always have to be from the streets or the hood to get noticed. Just show a regular family. Jordan Peele's
Us got this right. And just because someone's from the hood, doesn't mean it speaks for all black people either. There are many black people from different walks of life that that do not involve the ghetto. I suggest you start opening your views and looking at other options.
Also, what worked in the 90s doesn't necessarily make everything foolproof nor should be the ultimate golden standard. TV changed long after
Fresh Prince ended. Changes come and go, but that is a stereotype that needs to die and unfortunately, is still enforced by certain people be they white, black, or a different race. Intentional or not. Besides, the point of
Fresh Prince and
Family Matters, was a show black people from all types of life in different economical classes. Though the latter was obviously more Blue collar focused. At least early on anyway.
That's what always confuses me about opinion pieces like this, because you could make a "woke" complaint about the character on either side of the coin. If the experience of her being poor and black is too stereotyped, then having come from a stable moderate income home would make her whitewashed, and you can't avoid the criticism.
That's your problem and your problem alone. You have a habit of assuming or acting as if nothing's wrong in certain parts of the media industry. That most racism/racial and cultural stereotyping is gone, or is not as big an issue as it once was. Or you automatically blow somebody off just because they have a most likely valid complaint or point. And even if it's imaginary or not, you feel the need to blow them off without giving it a second thought, or just assume everything is hunky dory with everyone, no matter the race or gender. Your view boils down to "I'm fine with it and then everyone else should be fine with it; end of story. No ifs and or buts." You don't speak for everyone.
So which way do you think is the better way to go about it?
The simple solution would obviously be getting more good and competent writers that are at least black or of a diverse racial background. And if they're not going to do that, at least consult with black people that know the culture and what to avoid of making unfortunate implications. It's not that hard to do. Just higher a few people as consultants and check your research. You be surprised that this is a bigger problem than you realize. The advertisement industry has had this problem a thousand times. Whenever they screw up, they panic and do all these quick apologies without learning much. All of it would be so much easier, if they gets somebody on the board of advertising/marketing that is non-white for once in their lives. Some have gotten better about this, but there's plenty of others that keep falling into the same mistakes over and over again.