Apparently giants in mythology weren't necessarily HUGE people and a fair number of supposed "giants" were either people sized or don't have their size explicitly mentioned. What is consistent is that giants were strong(often very strong) and often monsterous and besital. Also their presence was generally assumed as "Well, someone moved these big ass rocks and must have been a giant" as opposed to having actual records or skeletons.
Though you can probably make a the case some of the "real" giants were the rare very tall person that kind of stood out amongst everyone else.
Also, someone pointed this out to me today.
In genesis 1: 27 (the first creation story, because Genesis 2 is different in notable ways to count as a 2nd):
1.) Gods image is that of male and female aspects.
2.) They were created together, not Adam and then Eve.
I mean, also that Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are actually different stories because enough details don't match up between them.
Though you can probably make a the case some of the "real" giants were the rare very tall person that kind of stood out amongst everyone else.
Also, someone pointed this out to me today.
In genesis 1: 27 (the first creation story, because Genesis 2 is different in notable ways to count as a 2nd):
The wording implies:So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
1.) Gods image is that of male and female aspects.
2.) They were created together, not Adam and then Eve.
I mean, also that Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are actually different stories because enough details don't match up between them.
Last edited: