Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter may soon go through

SilentPony

Previously known as an alleged "Feather-Rustler"
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
12,059
2,472
118
Corner of No and Where
The mute feature does what is required by those app stores. It allows you to remove the content you don't want to see from your feed and not receive correspondence from people you don't want to hear from.

The Twitter block feature is actually rather unique, as it currently exists. Social media platforms have ways to make it so you don't have to see or hear from other users of your choice. And most give users the ability to make posts private, so that only specific accounts can see it. Twitter is the only platform I'm aware of with a tool that lets you make it so only specific users can't see your posts. No app store requires social media apps to give users that ability. Youtube doesn't have that, nor does it have a feature named "block", it just has the ability to hide channels, and that obviously meets Google Play's terms.
That sounds like a hair split that a few dozen lawyers will spend 18 months and a few million dollars of Musk's money figuring out
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,213
969
118
Country
USA
That sounds like a hair split that a few dozen lawyers will spend 18 months and a few million dollars of Musk's money figuring out
It isn't at all splitting hairs. It will cost them nothing because all the relevant parties already know this. Google and Apple aren't threatening to kick Twitter off of things, silly people on the internet reached that incorrect conclusion entirely on their own.
 

Absent

And twice is the only way to live.
Jan 25, 2023
1,594
1,557
118
Country
Switzerland
Gender
The boring one
Elon Musk trying to out-crazy James Woods. It's not a cage they need to fight in, it's a padded cell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mister Mumbler

Majestic_Manatee

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2017
107
92
33
Country
Wales
How did he post this tweet and not stop one moment to think about how his own experience on the platform will be?
Ego. He believes they adore him, so blocking is performative punishment with the intent to show them how much they should hate the function. "Where will they be without their generous god?"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
29,499
12,265
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
There are rumors going around that there's a particular substance Elon may be abusing that's contributing to his behavior.
And I'm not horsing around when I say that.
Hopefully he can overdose on that substance and expire. Elon would not be missed. Fanatics don't count.
 

Absent

And twice is the only way to live.
Jan 25, 2023
1,594
1,557
118
Country
Switzerland
Gender
The boring one

The move may be an attempt to drive people to sign up for X’s premium service
No. It's a move to boost disinformation. The links used to show the sources, letting people filter at first glance what comes from reliable, respected, reference sources and what came from foxnews, stormfront or whatnot. Now, the "info" is presented at the same level of credibility wherever it comes from, leaving people with an equal doubt or engagement, an equal cognitive imprint at the important first contact (before investigation). This benefits solely the most dishonest, manipulative sources, increases their visibility (people will have to pay them attention if only to identify them, agreeing to the demanded "hear me out") at the expense of what Musks fights : reference journalism and reality.

It's a mere boost for political manipulation and demagoguery, what Musk and fascists in general are all about.
 

Satinavian

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 30, 2016
1,941
805
118
No. It's a move to boost disinformation.
No, the move is an attempt to make journalists post at least headline and blurb on twitter directly instead of just posting a link. Which means that twitter "owns" that headline and blurb and the journalist is publishing news content on twitter. That is also why it is mentioned in connection with content creator compensation. The supposed endgame is that the whole articles are on twitter because journalists abandon the papers to have more reach on the platform.

It is incredibly fishy and won't work.
 

Chimpzy

Simian Abomination
Legacy
Escapist +
Apr 3, 2020
12,876
9,314
118
No, the move is an attempt to make journalists post at least headline and blurb on twitter directly instead of just posting a link. Which means that twitter "owns" that headline and blurb and the journalist is publishing news content on twitter. That is also why it is mentioned in connection with content creator compensation. The supposed endgame is that the whole articles are on twitter because journalists abandon the papers to have more reach on the platform.

It is incredibly fishy and won't work.
It can be both. Musk has already shown some rather preferential treatment of who gets content creator compensation, and how much. I see no reason why the same would not apply to journalists publishing on twitter.
 

Satinavian

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 30, 2016
1,941
805
118
It would. That is why it will fail.

Honestly, the "creator compensation" funds were only a couple of million worldwide. That is basically nothing per creator, not even a significant number per creator with a million followers or whatever. There were a couple of big payouts, but math dictates that those were nothing but publicity stunts. And unsurprisingly those seemed to be handpicked by Musk from his favorites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan