No, you're right I shoudn't mention SK money. It used money from the Iran deal for its missile force, and its military. Free up funds from doing welfare stuff, and put it towards the foreign batshit stuff.
Conversely, people of different religions can live together without fighting over it if there's no reason to fight. There's been places where Christians, Muslims and Jews have co-existed mostly peacefully for centuries because they had no reason not to.
Right, but in the 21st century, we only have to worry about one of those religions. Three guesses as to which, and the first two don't count.
By "we", I assume you're not referring to humanity at large, but rather just people in Western Europe and America. Considering the tens of countries run by brutal Christian dictatorships, the LRA, and the apartheid state being operated by Likud.
No, I mean "we" as in humanity.
So because Islamic terrorism exists, humanity "doesn't need to worry" about all the other shite? Is there a clause somewhere that we only need to be worried by the single greatest threat, and all the others are rendered moot?
No, there isn't, I never said that. But in the scope of religious terrorism/dictatorship, Islam is a cut above the others.
Yes, climate change is a greater issue than Islamic terrorism. I agree. Now pick out where I said otherwise.
Eritrea is draconian towards religion in general, including Christianity. Uganda is more of a hybrid regime, but there's nothing particularly Christian about it. Belarus is undoubtedly a dictatorship, but again, nothing particularly Christian about it, it's hardly a theocracy. Russia, again, a dictatorship, and one that has certainly used religion to its ends, but calling it a "Christian dictatorship" is a stretch. None of these are theocratical dictatorships. There's no shortage of Islamic states in the world, there's nothing remotely comparable in Christianity. Even when Christianity plays a de facto role or has oversized influence, most countries where that's the case are still secular.
Why is "Conflict Between Palestine and Israel Escalates" the "thread about Israeli warcrimes"? Do you not undermine your point by doing exactly the same thing, acting as if only Israel can do wrong?
You said we "don't need to worry" about the others. So yes, you sort of did say they aren't issues.
You said we needn't worry about X because Y is worse. I applied the same reasoning to point out how silly it is.
Goalposts. You didn't say theocratic dictatorships. I said Christian dictatorships, and you said you were unaware of them. Those are four examples.
It may have something to do with the fact that for the majority of the past several decades, the IDF has committed far more egregious and numerous war crimes and racked up a body count far higher.
You're not going to find many reasonable people left in the middle east, on any side. It sucks, but the region has been subjected to decades of brain drain - everyone smart enough or wealthy enough to leave has left. The ones who remain are either the poor who will get caught up in the fighting as soldiers 'cause a job is a job, or the religious zealots hell bent on fighting this one out in the name of their God.
Not be too surprised if they would.
One user criticized Islamic terrorists.
Unfortunately (because I'd care much much less), that isn't quite true. We're working with many great people on both sides. And that makes it all the more distressing, because their efforts get completely crushed by these mutual acts of violence.
Because "criticising them for only considering Israeli war crimes" isn't all you did, and you know it.
That is true. I also talked about current events that warrant criticism of Hamas. That is not contradictory.
