And Patrick Bateman.Don't you know? Protagonists are always heroes. Like Tyler Durden, Joker, and Light Yagami.
And Patrick Bateman.Don't you know? Protagonists are always heroes. Like Tyler Durden, Joker, and Light Yagami.
Deadpool was a villain before becoming an anti-hero. Wolverine also started as a villain too. Hiei, Ren Tao, Vegeta...we can go on all night.Dr. Doom, Deathstroke (the rare case of a villain who is both a hitman and a sexual predator), Angel (which did this with two Buffy villains), the Punisher, Shadow the Hedgehog, Zuko just to name a few.
Hell, Sony has been trying to make a cinematic universe with Spider-Man villains (most of whom are male and only a few of which have ever been heroes) since 2016.
This idea that male villains have never been given a shot at being the heroes of their own stories is an easily disproved lie that only the most gullible of misogynists would believe.
About that....The only movie that comes to mind with a villain protagonist that I haven't seen rightoids hold up as some kind of hero is Nightcrawler.
- Misaimed Fandom: Despite being a sociopathic Villain Protagonist with no narration to explain any of his thoughts, some audience members (mostly male) ended up rooting for or even relating to Lou Bloom due to his unrepentant behavior and emotional detachment from people not being deterred by his charisma, with another plus maybe even being the fact he gets away with it all, which may make the movie feel like an odd power fantasy of sorts for lonely insecure men along the same lines of Taxi Driver. As a result, he's sometimes considered part of the infamous "Literally me" batch of characters consisting of other charismatic psychopaths such as Patrick Bateman and Tyler Durden.
It's funny how feeble the mind becomes, when it wants to forget. I bet you, if anyone showed them all of the males examples, the fuckwads would either count them as "exceptions" or "crappy examples".This idea that male villains have never been given a shot at being the heroes of their own stories is an easily disproved lie that only the most gullible of misogynists would believe.
I have not seen these people. I have seen all the others, but I have never seen Lou Bloom fans.Deadpool was a villain before becoming an anti-hero. Wolverine also started as a villain too. Hiei, Ren Tao, Vegeta...we can go on all night.
About that....
It's funny how feeble the mind comes, when it wants to forget. I bet you, if anyone showed them all of the males examples, the fuckwads would either count them as "exceptions" or "crappy examples".
Well, some of them exists. This is is news to me too. I've never watched Nightcrawler, but I am more than aware of Lou.I have not seen these people. I have seen all the others, but I have never seen Lou Bloom fans.
The only movie that comes to mind with a villain protagonist that I haven't seen rightoids hold up as some kind of hero is Nightcrawler.
Well, some of them exists. This is is news to me too. I've never watched Nightcrawler, but I am more than aware of Lou.
Not that it undermines your overall point, but these two don't count on this list. They were both made to be heroes in their original source material, and you could tell Zuko was a good guy from episode 1.Shadow the Hedgehog, Zuko just to name a few.
Ah, don't want to block the discussion: But the examples given are not of villainous female characters but: Female villains, which got a feature after their use as a villain, and have them as a sympathetic protagonist. (Mostly decades later, with added backstories).
Dr. Doom, Deathstroke (the rare case of a villain who is both a hitman and a sexual predator), Angel (which did this with two Buffy villains), the Punisher, Shadow the Hedgehog, Zuko just to name a few.
Hell, Sony has been trying to make a cinematic universe with Spider-Man villains (most of whom are male and only a few of which have ever been heroes) since 2016.
This idea that male villains have never been given a shot at being the heroes of their own stories is an easily disproved lie that only the most gullible of misogynists would believe.
Zuko and Shadow started as villains before becoming heroes. Where they ended up doesn't change where they started.Not that it undermines your overall point, but these two don't count on this list. They were both made to be heroes in their original source material, and you could tell Zuko was a good guy from episode 1.
And as I pointed out, this isn't limited to female villains. This happens to male villains as well and has been happening for much longer. People only notice it with female villains because there are few of them compared to their male counterparts (this applies to heroes as well).Ah, don't want to block the discussion: But the examples given are not of villainous female characters but: Female villains, which got a feature after their use as a villain, and have them as a sympathetic protagonist. (Mostly decades later, with added backstories).
Loki, Joker and Venom come to mind as just a few examples. Loki and Venom faced less pushback than Cruella and Malificent, the biggest objection the Joker movie was that it would inspire more mass shootings.So, this post still stands.
I don't like it for other reasons. While the IDEA of making a movie/series about and centered on a well-known, iconic villain is a great idea (I freaking love villains - nearly always more entertaining as the "boring conservative hero"), i think the problem ist just this "we need to cram likeability into this, no moral grey. No hard questions."
We do have a few classic villain characters: reimagined, rebuild and male. The "Joker" Movie, for example. But i think a lot more of this weird inoffensive female disney-villain variety. Is there a inoffensive male "ex-villain" movie. Have to think about it.
Also, in AtLA it's the male antagonist who gets redeemed and the female antagonist who succumbs to complete insane villiany, eventhough she is shown to have humanity.Zuko and Shadow started as villains before becoming heroes. Where they ended up doesn't change where they started.
And if you want a version of Frollo that is treated sympathetically in spite of his vile actions, you can just read the original novel version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame.Also, in AtLA it's the male antagonist who gets redeemed and the female antagonist who succumbs to complete insane villiany, eventhough she is shown to have humanity.
The whole humanizing older villains has little to do with gender and everything to do with popularity and marketability. Both Maleficent and Cruella are very iconic villains with memorable looks, while Gaston and Frolo have an ickiness to them that makes them not the most appealing outside of their villain status.
Speaking of Hercules, the male villain in that movie was pretty much the most likeable and popular character there. Ironic considering who James Woods is, but I'm sure some Disney executive has crunched the numbers to gage if Hades' popularity could warrant somekind of prequel origin movie.And if you want a version of Frollo that is treated sympathetically in spite of his vile actions, you can just read the original novel version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame.
A heroic version of Gaston would basically just be Hercules, Eric or Philip and those guys don't have the baggage Gaston comes with.
Hades prequel: “and it turned out Hades became evil because his dad ate him as a kid”Speaking of Hercules, the male villain in that movie was pretty much the most likeable and popular character there. Ironic considering who James Woods is, but I'm sure some Disney executive has crunched the numbers to gage if Hades' popularity could warrant somekind of prequel origin movie.
Hm, i thought Loki had protagonist-material from WAY before, back in the 80ies comics... but a quick search (I am not that into the comics, just had a friend "teaching me" in school, hehe) reveals that those stuff seems to have been cropping up after the modern movies (2012). Don't know... So yeah, it seems that would perfectly count. (Him getting a series where he is smoother, sympathetic and non-threatening after trying to conquer the world.)And as I pointed out, this isn't limited to female villains. This happens to male villains as well and has been happening for much longer. People only notice it with female villains because there are few of them compared to their male counterparts (this applies to heroes as well).
Disney only started getting into this trend recently. They have a far longer history of making unsympathetic female villains. Ironically, Ursula wasn't even a villain in the original novel version of The Little Mermaid.
Loki, Joker and Venom come to mind as just a few examples. Loki and Venom faced less pushback than Cruella and Malificent, the biggest objection the Joker movie was that it would inspire more mass shootings.
And as I said, Sony has been trying to make heroes out of Spider-Man villains since 2016.
All it really does is prove how full of crap the sexist jackass is really are with your examples. I'm more or less said the same thing earlier. So nothing new, and it's just spoiled buttholes crying over nothing and feeling like they're owed something when they've already got what they wanted a million times over. They just want to forget or are that stupid and ignorant of the situations.Hm, i thought Loki had protagonist-material from WAY before, back in the 80ies comics... but a quick search (I am not that into the comics, just had a friend "teaching me" in school, hehe) reveals that those stuff seems to have been cropping up after the modern movies (2012). Don't know... So yeah, it seems that would perfectly count. (Him getting a series where he is smoother, sympathetic and non-threatening after trying to conquer the world.)
But Venom for example already was envisioned as flexible and had his own comics. (I mean, yeah first villain, than antihero, then hero) - But way back before any movies. It seems more of the Zeitgeist of the rad/extreme/edgy 90ies. No sudden from-the-top demanding to reimagine that black evil spiderman-guy. More organic.
Zuko was a protagonist from the first episode. Shadow was a in a heroic pose on the cover of the game case. Their role in the plot was always to be heroes from the moment you first see them. Being a jerk for a part of the story does not make a character a villain.Zuko and Shadow started as villains before becoming heroes. Where they ended up doesn't change where they started.
Man you suck at this. It's called villain protagonist journey to hero or antihero. Even with these type of subjects you can't get it right.Zuko was a protagonist from the first episode. Shadow was a in a heroic pose on the cover of the game case. Their role in the plot was always to be heroes from the moment you first see them. Being a jerk for a part of the story does not make a character a villain.
Villains can be protagonists too.Zuko was a protagonist from the first episode.
What heroic pose?Shadow was a in a heroic pose on the cover of the game case.
The game's advertising outright refers to Shadow as evil.Their role in the plot was always to be heroes from the moment you first see them.
Trying to destroy the world and framing someone else for your crimes is a bit more than "being a jerk".Being a jerk for a part of the story does not make a character a villain.