I believe that the syndrome was invented by the authorities to discredit the hostages when they didn't go along with the narrative. Which, in context, yeah.
Conflict between Palestine and Israel escalates
- Thread starter dreng3
- Start date
I don't believe an intelligent person can look at that tweet with the digital equivalent of dumping white out on the page before photo copying it and not be suspicious that they are leaving things out. I bet if you find the full report, it reads something like this:
None of that contradicts the tweet. The Jewish State in Palestine terrorist organization claimed to have proof of systematic mass rape ordered by Hamas officials. The UN investigated and concluded that, among other things, they did not have such proof.
For people curious about the UN reports:
Report on the Hamas attack on 7 October
Report on the subsequent Israeli military operations in Gaza
I've only read a news item summarizing the key take-aways. It appears both sides have committed war crimes.
Report on the Hamas attack on 7 October
Report on the subsequent Israeli military operations in Gaza
I've only read a news item summarizing the key take-aways. It appears both sides have committed war crimes.
UN: "We don't have concrete proof of every terrible thing being accused. But don't minimize any of this, or you're part of the problem."
Tweet: "UN says there's no proof. It's over!"
You: posts the tweet without comment.
Do you ever feel even a little guilt about purposely making people less informed?
The Labour manifesto was published this morning. Given that they're almost certain to form the next government in less than a month, it's relevant to post the section dealing with Israel and Palestine;
...but there's still a bit of weaselly language there. Peace isn't a precondition, but it doesn't make it unconditional. It seems to leave the door open for an internal judgement that the peace process isn't at the right stage or some other excuse. I'd have liked more solidity and unambiguity.
So, commitment to recognising a Palestinian state "as a contribution to a renewed peace process", and calls it an "inalienable right". OK, promising so far, and also good to see it doesn't make peace a precondition of statehood. Its understood that Labour included this due to the prospect of losing votes in the Muslim and progressive communities.
...but there's still a bit of weaselly language there. Peace isn't a precondition, but it doesn't make it unconditional. It seems to leave the door open for an internal judgement that the peace process isn't at the right stage or some other excuse. I'd have liked more solidity and unambiguity.
The tweet included: "It concludes that though there was violence against women (SVGB)"
it literally explicitly referenced what you're saying. There is no contradiction. You just want there to be a problem.
Don't worry about what Keith says now. Every day is new, full of all sorts of plans and promises to declare and later discard.
It included a qualifier while literally deleting the actual context. That qualifier is a trick to make you think it's a reasonable, even-handed summary. It's shameless propaganda, and you really could use some more shame.
No, I did not read any further down the ridiculous nonsense.
I can read the actual report though:
" The woman has what appears to be a large blood stain on her trousers around the genital and gluteal area. "
" The woman had been undressed from the waist down, with her genitals exposed and bearing blood marks on her genitals. "
Oh, and also:
" In some cases, there were indications that gasoline had been used to set genitals on fire."
So basically, your twitter thread is "Oh my god, they didn't even use the word nail! It was a hoax the whole time."
Seanchaidh, I have never heard the accusation of nails in vaginas. I googled it and found nothing at all of substance. What a stupid thing to "debunk".
I'd tell you to shut up, but spamming tweets isn't really talking.
In a saner time, you'd be banned for low content, low effort posts 1000 times over.
Generally assume that no one follows X threads because you can't do that anymore unless you have an X account.