Funny events in anti-woke world

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
2,434
1,852
118
Country
The Netherlands
There was no morphing, they've always been this way. Take it from someone who spends a lil too much time observing their media, influencers and communities: the reality is far uglier than many assume, and they exploit your tendencies to want to see the best, the most hopeful within them. But it's an old con. People keep forgetting. People keep taking them and their vast highly-funded news/misinformation networks n ecosystem at face value, despite over half a century of consistent evidence that they'll say anything as long as it gets them to power, and when they're in power they'll say anything to deflect responsibility onto everyone else. Plz try to keep all this in memory, though is understandably difficult when lives have to lived, struggles have to be endured and tragedies have to be confronted both on the personal and societal level. But they've been taking advantage of this generational political amnesia for so long now, stripping every new event of context (or relying on mere omission, usually, thanks to inadequate political education provided in legacy news), morally flattening the rest to claim it's merely no different than what you'd do - we have to be serious about what needs to change to even have the slightest fighting chance, cos what's been tried is clearly not working and actively just helping them instead.

I think you're largely correct over the Republican party as a whole. Their leaders, their strategists and their representatives. Their voters however are another issue. I don't think the typical MAGA voter was lying when they went on about how they hated Bush, and how the wars had been a disaster that they were sick of. Had this sentiment not lived in their base then the Republican party would have no need to scapegoat Bush and pretend to be isolationist. And in that sense the MAGA base really has radicalized and morphed into what they claim to hate.

Through MAGA they've been ''re educated'' on the matter and now think foreign wars, even foreign wars in the Middle East are glorious. Or deep down they always felt losing the wars was the real reason they hated it rather than the morality and casualties and thanks to their radicalisation they learned to admit that to themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XsjadoBlaydette

Hades

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2013
2,434
1,852
118
Country
The Netherlands
Its really fun to see what the oh so nuanced ''Geert Milders'' is writing when he thinks the Dutch electorate isn't looking.

Wilders wrote a piece in the far right dreck that is Breitbart where he waxes poetically about god and country in a way he'd never be caught doing at home since the Dutch are too 'sober'' to really appreciate that. Aside from stressing the importance of god he also praised Thatcher in a time where ''livelyhood security'' is a big topic for the country, as well as going full on the anti woke brigade which while having an audience is too wacky to really land with the mainstream Dutch audience due to the aforementioned soberness. And when the Dutch audience wasn't looking he was wildly flattering about Trump who even his own voters think is a complete freak. Not a word about cost of living or housing crisis though! Ol' Milders kinda let the mask slip there.


In adition the Dutch coalition is facing its newest crisis where it may fall if the bickering parties don't find a way out of the mess. Not that I expect it to fall on this since both saint Omzight and Wilders have the spine of a banana. But what's interesting is that by all accounts they expect it to fall. Just last week Wilders blocked measures to tackle overpopulation in prison because according to him the coalition can fall any day now and he doesn't want ''Wilders releases prisoners'' to be the first headline of the campaign. The farmers party too withdrew their support from certain plans to get in the good grace of their base.

The problem is that the bungling Migration Minister's plans were reviewed by the council of state who felt it was a bunch of unsubstantiated, counterproductive gibberish and advised against implementing those plans in their current form. This review is just advisory and the government isn't obliged to listen, but pushing it through unchanged gets you the image of the government deliberately implementing bad plans purely for private gain. And this directly clashes with Saint Omzight who (allegedly) is big on good governance and rule of law.

In the past saint Omzight's party has expressed a lot of discomfort about the idea of sidelining the council of state to knowingly implement sub par legislation. Wilders on the other hand has loudly shouted he doesn't ''Even want to change a letter'' and that after he didn't get to be the prime minister, and after he didn't get to sideline parliament the PVV sacrificed enough. Wilders made it clear that if he's not allowed to implement the bad plans unchanged, then he'll bring down the coalition.

So the coalition is at real risk of falling, but because one can never trust on saint Omzight to follow his principles we can expect him to cave and the government remaining in office.
 

XsjadoBlaydette

~s•o√r∆rπy°`Inc hope GrIfts etUrnaL
May 26, 2022
1,142
1,429
118
Clear 'n Present Danger
Country
Must
Gender
Disappear
I think you're largely correct over the Republican party as a whole. Their leaders, their strategists and their representatives. Their voters however are another issue. I don't think the typical MAGA voter was lying when they went on about how they hated Bush, and how the wars had been a disaster that they were sick of. Had this sentiment not lived in their base then the Republican party would have no need to scapegoat Bush and pretend to be isolationist. And in that sense the MAGA base really has radicalized and morphed into what they claim to hate.

Through MAGA they've been ''re educated'' on the matter and now think foreign wars, even foreign wars in the Middle East are glorious. Or deep down they always felt losing the wars was the real reason they hated it rather than the morality and casualties and thanks to their radicalisation they learned to admit that to themselves.
Ah, yeah, I forgot to clarify am usually not talking about everyday voters/citizens in regards to crucial primary sources of harm perpetuated through bad faith politics (is realpolitik the right term?) - sticking close as poss to rule of actual results in mind, praxis as key, requires laser focus on producers, investors, gatekeepers, editors, influencers and politicians shaping the realities of the passively mis/disinformed. Seeing as most the ppl I deal with in real life are in some way or another pulled into these spheres of influence, as well as living in a traditionally conservative area, it would be, at best, unhelpful to hold them in such antagonistic terms. Also can't forget being someone who knew nothing at all about politics for a lot of young adulthood: nobody told me nuffin' about the world that weren't apathy and casual racism - is the lens have kept to build communicative tools around and the target in mind to try imparting accumulated knowledge and understanding once so absent in own life towards. Have wondered how different I and many others may have turned out if instead of homelessness I just had Jordan Peterson thrust into various device algorithms during the time girls were distant and scary instead. Things could've gone darker than they already were.

Have noticed some peeps recently perceive, or vocalise this as a free will argument, but tbh the whole free will "debate" is pointless distraction leaving us chasing our own tails unless time travel's invented to test it. Though could be another semantic misunderstanding, different ppl using different words to describe the same thing or the same words to describe different things.


Anymoo, whoopsi doodles Milo said the quiet part loud again about artificially boosting popularity and recieving billionaire payouts! Poor old Tim can't Adderall-stammer his way out of everything these days, lol
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,300
3,988
118
But what's truly interesting is how MAGA morphed into everything they once claimed to hate when Trump unveiled his plan for ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Sending American soldiers to die in the Middle East to fight terrorism...that's BUSH! And MAGA swore they haaaated Bush. Trump the ''supremely peaceful president''(pfff!) was supposed to be a rejection of Bush and his ''neocons''. Some MAGA loonies try to spin the ethnic cleansing as ''Trump just wanting to make Gaza a nice place to live for them'', but that's exactly like Bush too. After all Bush rarely said it was about oil or settling old grudges. No, he said it was to 'help'' the Middle East by installing democracies.
"We have always been at war with Eastasia."

As an aside, though, that also applies to Bush's stated aims in Iraq. It was for regime change, but before that it was because of WMDs, and before that it was due to Al-Qaeda and/or Hussein trying to off his dad.

cos what's been tried is clearly not working and actively just helping them instead.
What's been tried by those with the power and responsibility to really do anything has been a rounding error away from zero, though. I mean, there'd probably be somewhat less genocide in Gaza under Harris than Trump, but c'mon, they could try a little harder than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XsjadoBlaydette

XsjadoBlaydette

~s•o√r∆rπy°`Inc hope GrIfts etUrnaL
May 26, 2022
1,142
1,429
118
Clear 'n Present Danger
Country
Must
Gender
Disappear
"A group known as the 'puppygirl hacker polycule' has leaked thousands of police training & policy manuals from departments across the country'


It makes you click off all the "legitimate interest" date syphon tabs separately instead of providing a "reject all" option. conscience is clear. as should be time

EXCLUSIVE: Hackers leak cop manuals for departments nationwide after breaching major provider
Critics accuse the company of wielding outsized private influence on public policing.
Posted on February 11 2025 9:01 am CST

Police Car and hacking imagery

(Licensed)

Hackers leaked thousands of files from Lexipol, a Texas-based company that develops policy manuals, training bulletins, and consulting services for first responders.

The manuals, which are crafted by Lexipol’s team of public sector attorneys, practitioners, and subject-matter experts, are customized to align with the specific needs and local legal requirements of agencies across the country.

But the firm also faces criticism for its blanket approach to police policies and pushback on reforms.

The data, a sample of which was given to the Daily Dot by a group referring to itself as “the puppygirl hacker polycule,” includes approximately 8,543 files related to training, procedural, and policy manuals, as well as customer records that contain names, usernames, agency names, hashed passwords, physical addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers.

Among the manuals seen by the Daily Dot, agencies include police departments, fire departments, sheriff’s offices, and narcotics units.

Lexipol says on its website that it also provides services to private and public EMS, district and state’s attorneys, city jails, probation departments, juvenile detention facilities, campus law enforcement, tribal police, risk management associations, state regulatory agencies, and more.

The full dataset was provided by the hackers to DDoSecrets, the non-profit journalist and data leak hosting collective, which notes that “Lexipol retains copyright over all manuals which it creates despite the public nature of its work.”

“There is little transparency on how decisions are made to draft their policies,” the non-profit said, “which have an oversized influence on policing in the United States.”

Some departments proactively publish their policy manuals online, while others keep them hidden from public view. One of the leaked manuals seen by the Daily Dot from the Orville Police Department in Ohio, for example, was not available online. Yet a nearly identical manual from Ohio’s Beachwood Police Department can be found on the city’s website.

The manuals cover matters ranging from the use of force and non-lethal alternatives to rules surrounding confidential informants and high-speed chases.

Given Lexipol’s status as a private company, the widespread adoption of such manuals has led to concerns over its influence on public policing policies. The centralization, critics argue, could result in standardized policies that do not accurately represent the needs or values of local communities.

As noted by the Texas Law Review, “although there are other private, nonprofit, and government entities that draft police policies, Lexipol is now a dominant force in police policymaking across the country.”

Lexipol has also been criticized for its resistance to police reform. The company’s manuals often exclude reform proposals such as requiring de-escalation and prohibitions on chokeholds.

In remarks to the Daily Dot, a hacker from the puppygirl hacker polycule said the group targeted Lexipol because there aren’t “enough hacks against the police.”

“So we took matters into our own paws,” the hacker said.

Founded by two former police officers-turned-lawyers in 2003, Lexipol has increased its customer base significantly over the years. The company has also caught the attention of civil liberties groups that have accused Lexipol of helping violent officers evade justice by crafting policies that provide broad discretion in use-of-force situations.

The company has been accused of discriminatory profiling as well. In 2017, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sent a letter to Lexipol demanding that it “eliminate illegal and unclear directives that can lead to racial profiling and harassment of immigrants.”

“The policies include guidelines that are unconstitutional and otherwise illegal, and can lead to improper detentions and erroneous arrests,” the ACLU said at the time, highlighting directives Lexipol issued cops that indicated they had more leeway to arrest immigrants than the law allowed.

The following year, the ACLU of Washington asserted that Lexipol’s policies led an officer in the city of Spokane to unlawfully detain and hold the victim of a car wreck to be questioned by immigration authorities.

The Daily Dot reached out to Lexipol to inquire about the breach but did not receive a reply by press time.​
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,452
6,695
118
Also, lol, Susan Collins
A person who repeatedly has to state objections or disapproval of stuff that's happened under their watch is either lying or ineffectual.

* * *

The Republicans ain't gonna do anything: Trump owns them.

Trump has some genuine talents, and one of them is his ability to identify a weakling and mercilessly steamroller them. He has looked deep into the souls of Congressional politicians (D and R), and he has seen the heaps of purest chickenshit before him. He's seen them quail, vacillate, compromise themselves, let themselves be dominated. Ony a few of them have actual values they'll really stand for, and even then half of them the cherished value they'd die for is "Trump 4 eva".

Take the last Congressional doofus (hard to even remember his name now), McCarthy. Failed to suck up to Trump enough, and swept away. Somehow, amazingly, despite all the years of experience of Trump as politician and decades of his behaviour as businessman before, like all the others, he just didn't get it. They've kept not realising what they are up against and kept not doing anything about it. They're all pussies. And we know that if Trump wants to grab a pussy, he's going to do so and they'll let him.

Trump can refuse to execute Congressional laws and he can ignore the courts' adjudications because he enforces the law. What on earth do you think they're actually going to do about it - impeach him? We've been there before twice, remember. People are consistent, and Congressional politicians have spent 8 long years consistently demonstrating that they will not and cannot stand up to Trump.
 

Chimpzy

Simian Abomination
Legacy
Escapist +
Apr 3, 2020
13,274
9,914
118
Makes sense, every child should learn what Nazi and Confederate flags look like, so they know what to burn.

White males clamoring for Starbucks barista jobs
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
17,109
9,841
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅

Chimpzy

Simian Abomination
Legacy
Escapist +
Apr 3, 2020
13,274
9,914
118
Trump Day is to be celebrated as follows: symbolically draining your pool while strewing in classified documents you borrowed from work. Afterwards there will be the traditional dinner of Burger King, well done steak with ketchup and Ambien while watching the all-day re-runs of the presidents favorite EO signings, followed by an evening of playing The Apprentice board game. The winner takes home a carton of eggs.

Anyone non-white, female, queer or too poor to own a pool will instead clean the pools of their betters of soaked paper and observe while they feast.
 
Last edited:

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,452
6,695
118
Is this normal? Does this sort of weird apotheosis get proposed by legislators every term, just it's usually not reported?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Chimpzy

Simian Abomination
Legacy
Escapist +
Apr 3, 2020
13,274
9,914
118
Is this normal? Does this sort of weird apotheosis get proposed by legislators every term, just it's usually not reported?
Not that I can find. Not at the federal level at least i.e. there are local ones honoring president(s) born in that particular state. Obama has one in Illinois. Same with Reagan and California. Kennedy and Massachusetts. Several states do Lincoln, sometimes joint with Washington.

President's Day is officially Washington's birthday, but often serves as a general holiday for all presidents, present or former.
 

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,452
6,695
118
Not that I can find. Not at the federal level at least i.e. there are local ones honoring president(s) born in that particular state. Obama has one in Illinois. Same with Reagan and California. Kennedy and Massachusetts. Several states do Lincoln, sometimes joint with Washington.

President's Day is officially Washington's birthday, but often serves as a general holiday for all presidents, present or former.
I guess there are two things here:
1) How big
2) When in relation to the president's term of office

Local stuff you expect: statues, naming parks after them, etc. Big, national stuff you'd expect they need to have been a really big deal: it's not like every president is on Mt. Rushmore. You'd normally expect this stuff, particularly the big stuff, turns up safely later than the term of office. Just so everyone can be reasonably confident the person being honoured wasn't a rapist, fraudster, convicted felon or anything embarrassing like that, or perhaps even more important being reasonably confident he actually did a good job. It seems kind of super-awks to dedicate a day to a sitting president only for him to thoroughly shit the bed with some debacle the next year.

I like to think democracies generally do honour people later rather than sooner as a sort of recognition of merit. Honours for existing leaders seems much more common to autocracy: who cares whether they aere any good, you need to show your devotion to the boss here and now (or else).