I mean, my fursona has massive tits anyway, so I'd be a hypocrite for complaining about that.
I'm explaining why she doesn't need exercise to be able to do the things she does, but of course you both know that, because you guys both know how to read.
Because nothing about the definition of "objective" or "subjective" has to do with whether or not a thing is known.
America's Army is an easy example. A game developed by the actual US Army to (as in: FOR THE PURPOSE OF) "inform, educate, and recruit prospective soldiers"
Eh, I disagree that she is "massive", but she is definitely buxom. I don't think it's an unrealistic level of boobage, other than my previously declared "a fighter wouldn't be able to sustain boobs that size" stance. I mean, I've had several girlfriends, and while I'm not a boob man specifically (ass man for days baby!!), I do enjoy some healthy boobage if my lover has them. And...well I've had some hands on experience with several lovely ladies and their chestly bundles of joy, and when I see the Reduced Tifa, I don't think they are excessively large. I'd say they are on the larger side of average really. Granted, I don't really study her in-game tits closely, or at all other than when someone brings up this subject, but I don't think they are unusual at the reduced level.
We can read just fine. But you once again are basically doing the opposite of the realism argument and using magic as a cheap justification. Two sides of the same time coin. You are once again complaining over spilled milk. Picking silly and stupid hills to die on. I'm not surprised that some small changes are giving you a heart attack.
It's called internal consistency.
Maybe, but Skyrim is still the end all be all of games modded to let pervs perv harder. I learned just how deep that well goes when I thought about playing Skyrim modded again, and I wanted a way to take captives and make them stay in arbitrary places (I specifically wanted to be able to set up places with bound captives to use as blood dens when I went vamp).
Good for you, nobody cares except for the ones that are similar minded to you over some dumb fan service. Square enix don't give a shit and most of the board don't give a shit. you're getting angry over the wrong thing. Especially when it's SE that screwed you guys over having you pay for the same game twice, split into two halves. But if you want to be miserable about it, have fun and enjoy. I'll be enjoying the finer things in life.
Square Enix released acharacter design book that talks about the characters style, design, and even goes so far as to tell you how long they take to do their hair.
The fact that you go way overboard on these flimsy justifications and keep making excuses of why her breast should be bigger, says otherwise. That's more than a disagreement. You're flipping out over the small subtle changes when she is mostly the same. And like I said before they add even more fan service into remake when you stop and think about it. It's one thing to be passionate, but it's another thing to just wangsty over really tiny superficial changes. You basically had that little upset when you talk about the ethics committee from square enix. You did not sound exactly happy about that and made it too obvious.
I mean i think in the original she had a chest of Watermelon's not actually tits. So I dunno. I've missed a lot of this thread due to a family member going into the ICU yesterday.
Yes, but how is it known? Like I said in my previous post, you only know about the secret blend because KFC explicitly say there is one.
Okay, so a recruitment tool for the Army would, but when we take a look at it with your criteria for propaganda;
First of all, your family member okay? I don't blame you for missing the thread period family is most important as always.
Oh dear. There is no reason to argue the difference in character design between shitty low rez polly and very primative early 3D modeling to today's hyperrealistic CG rendering. @Houseman this is a very dumb point to make and doesn't even make sense. Of course Tifa had to be different because of graphical scale and proper realistic, versus animated character design. These are not equal things.
What's overboard about noting what is or isn't internally consistent?
What makes you think I'm "flipping out"?
Don't believe BrawlMan. The first person to bring it up was TheMysteriousGX in this post, and afterward, Dwarven made a comment about how it was a change made by the "ethics" committee, then I commented how the leather outfit has her with a bigger chest than her Remake outfit, then Happy tried to justify it using real-world rules, and I disagreed with him about that. That's basically it.
Doesn't matter. How it is or isn't know is irrelevant.
Like I said: "I'm sure this criteria can be improved upon by studying existing examples of unambiguous propaganda, but it's a start.
Brawlman is lying to you, I'm not making the point he's accusing me of making.
Ah but didn't it?
Figure it out. You already know the answer to that.
Riveting.
You were just complaining about the size of Tifa's breast making crazy justifications, because it's a magical Fantasyland. You were the one telling me that and give me a response with a screenshot of remake tifa complaining about the size of her chest, being too small. It's on the previous pages. You're the one going on about the square enix ethics committee. That was you who brought it up
In VII remake's case, no. I highly doubt that tifa's increase or slight lack of increased breast size would have made that big a difference in sales. SE still got their money. And the Fanboys at wine and bitched about nothing, did not really gain or win anything. Unless they wanted a remake of a game that was cut in half into two parts, then yes. They would be deluding themselves though.
