Nope, here in the UK there is no blame for under-aged couples having sex in a way that would allow a suing, it is illegal so if the police wished I guess they could prosecute the parents but I've never heard of any such thing. Thankfully suing for every little slight hasn't caught on here as yet.Mstrswrd said:Oh lord. The mind boggles. I'm surprised each family isn't suing the other for rape or something... unless the laws in the UK are differnet. I know in the US, if two people consent to sex, but are both underaged, technically, it's rape, and each family can be sued by the other. Is that how it works in the UK, or not?
That's an interesting figure. England has a population somewhat higher than 50 000 000, so that's 0.38 pence per citizen. Let's say a ha'pence per tax payer. Spread out over eighteen years. I feel your pain.MrGFunk said:"KidsTax payers £-190,000 (average cost of raising a child to 18)"
I see your eight year old mom and raise [http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/medina.asp].TheHorizon said:An eight year old mother had a baby once.
That's per kid though and there a hundreds born every day to underage or unemployed 'people' across Britain(I can't back that up with figures) but it adds up. Surely, I shouldn't have to pay for my own kids and people's kids because they can't afford them. They shouldn't have kids and then force me to pay for the kids and them to look after the kids.Jenny Creed said:That's an interesting figure. England has a population somewhat higher than 50 000 000, so that's 0.38 pence per citizen. Let's say a ha'pence per tax payer. Spread out over eighteen years. I feel your pain.MrGFunk said:"KidsTax payers £-190,000 (average cost of raising a child to 18)"
a7r0p05 said:Recently, a 13 year old British boy became a father to his 15 year old girlfriends baby. I won't say too much because the article isn't long, so I'll leave it up to you to read about it. I just want to know, is this one of the worst things that society has done to it's youth?
http://tinyurl.com/13yroldparent <--The Sun link
http://tinyurl.com/cejoy6 <--FoxNews link
Also, I think that the child should be taken from them, mainly because of this:
"When asked how he is going to cope financially, Alfie replied, bemused, 'What's financially?'"
EDIT: Added FoxNews link
This is why the gene pool should have an IQ test. If you don't pass, you can go to the wading pool and play with the dolls.Sewblon said:This is why minors should not have sex. I just hope that their parents can support them and the baby until they both turn 18. I am against giving the baby to the state because I don't trust any government with anything fragile.
Arntor said:Use. Protection. Damn. It.
Needs. More. Sex. Education.
We get this shit taught to us almost constantly. Its not the education. Its the fact that they're retards and would better serve mankind if they were made into dog food.Labyrinth said:Ladies and gentlemen: Why sex and contraception should be taught together.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:I didn't realise that the government charged all bills and expenses of child raising directly to your bank account. I was under the impression that, while hundreds of kids may be born every day to unemployed parents, millions of people pay the taxes which will make sure that those kids stay above the poverty line. Y'know, with the cost upon each person being lessened by the fact that there are millions of people paying. How silly of me.MrGFunk said:That's per kid though and there a hundreds born every day to underage or unemployed 'people' across Britain(I can't back that up with figures) but it adds up. Surely, I shouldn't have to pay for my own kids and people's kids because they can't afford them. They shouldn't have kids and then force me to pay for the kids and them to look after the kids.Jenny Creed said:That's an interesting figure. England has a population somewhat higher than 50 000 000, so that's 0.38 pence per citizen. Let's say a ha'pence per tax payer. Spread out over eighteen years. I feel your pain.MrGFunk said:"KidsTax payers £-190,000 (average cost of raising a child to 18)"
You mean you don't remember having "nightly emissions" at twelve? I'm betting he was just trying to find out what they were.I_LIKE_CAKE said:Just curious, but if the kid's voice hadn't cracked when the article was written, and the child was conceived a year before,can someone explain to me how a prepubescent twelve year old boy managed to...um, well you know?
Its a magazine for adults effectively - its trash.magic8BALL said:The Sun is a leading British news paper, as far as I know.
Once genetic engineering works, I will get right on that.Radelaide said:This is why the gene pool should have an IQ test. If you don't pass, you can go to the wading pool and play with the dolls.Sewblon said:This is why minors should not have sex. I just hope that their parents can support them and the baby until they both turn 18. I am against giving the baby to the state because I don't trust any government with anything fragile.
I thought it was in british schools?, in France I had the banana condom thing, same with in Spain.Labyrinth said:Ladies and gentlemen: Why sex and contraception should be taught together.
Yeah, the contrary - I am stressed but I use.Assassinator said:Seen a documentary about a country in South-America, can't remember the name but they sad that Opus Dei was pretty much in controll. Anyway, they forced 10 year old children to give birth there, and contraception was pretty much banned (like an unwritten rule).
Difference ofcourse is that this happened in Brittain.
I've got this 14 year old co-worker (total jailbait) who hates condoms and is planning to get tótally wasted with Carnaval next week. Combined with this little topic (and ofcourse the rest), I just say: today's parents and schools failed when a 14 year old girl doesn't care about condoms.raxiv said:There are people like me, who are stressed even when the girl is using a pill and I am using a condom.