"A little too far?" I'd say this much more than a little too far. These girls need a psychological evaluation.
8th grade Girls Attack/Strip 11-Year-Old Boy
- Thread starter tofulove
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Okay, I get that it's not the kid's fault, but seriously, he needs to learn to stand up for himself. I think this is one of the few situations where a boy might be justified in hitting a girl.
Like Phillip DeFranco always says, "Bitches be crazy."
And like I just started saying, "Give a man an inch, and he'll think it's a mile. Give a woman an inch, and she'll think it's the circumference of the Earth." Gotta stop that shit before it starts. Ya feel me, dawg?
Like Phillip DeFranco always says, "Bitches be crazy."
And like I just started saying, "Give a man an inch, and he'll think it's a mile. Give a woman an inch, and she'll think it's the circumference of the Earth." Gotta stop that shit before it starts. Ya feel me, dawg?
For me it's not so much the act, but the fact that the girls believed it was just a harmless prank and it would be totally awesome to post it online so all their friends can laugh at them tormenting an innocent 11 year old.SAT4NSLILHELPER said:
These girls need to be punished. Big time. Otherwise their going to be left with the impression that it's totally okey to strip down a 11 year old boy in a public are and laught at him.
...I wonder what the reaction would have been if it was an 11 year old GIRl they stripped down.
Well I'm not sure about judicial precdent, but I think even if you tried to file a charge of theft, a police officer here (Australia) would laugh you into the next century and say;Razada said:
"Look... No damages or loss of property = not theft ... if the person does it again without your permission then you might have a legal leg to stand on. Please advise the one that transgressed that you do not approve."
I went to a Catholic HS (at the time of the misdemeanour) till I moved out of home and enrolled myself into a decent public school.
A Catholic HS that liked using massive guilt treatment. Which is quite effective mind you, but I don't think it's the most psychologically sound of treatments of poor behaviour.
See ... call it what you like, but frankly I think parents should be the ones expected to discipline their kids. Judicial process shouldn't be expected to fill those gaps as well.
The girls SHOULD be charged. Criminally. Not by the mother, but by a district attorney. This is unacceptable and must be punished.
That system only works when the parents are reasonable, lol. The youngest son (maybe seven-years-old) of the family across the road once pissed on our driveway and broke several of my mum's garden decorations by smashing them on the road. The parents thought it funny and laughed it off.PaulH said:
Fail parents are fail!
Exactly what I was thinking.s0m3th1ng said:
Didn't watch the video. Didn't think I could stomach it. Apparently, the victim's mom isn't pressing charges. Is there any sign of the girls getting appropriate punishment at least? Because if not, this is only going to continue.
So the mum can easily press charges for battery and get the thorps down for child porn, for posting it on the Internet.
At what point did she decide that there is nothing she can do?
At what point did she decide that there is nothing she can do?
I agree with that to an extent, but there reaches a point where there is little a parent can legally do to punish there kids. This is far beyond that point, it is a matter for the police force to deal with.PaulH said:
Why is everyone getting so worked up about this? It's just A PRANK! You guys are all wound up too tightly, it's just A PRANK! The mother should have only pressed charges if it were a girl getting stripped naked -essentially sexually assaulted- in front of many oh so evil spectators by 13 year-old boys as girls are physically incapable of rape or any of your disgusting man-crimes you silly people!
If only college girls treated me like that...
On a serious note. He probably did not enjoy it or felt it was something to brag about considering how young he was so ya that's messed up. Then again if they were ugly Id have hated it to. . . You know what? The more I think about it the more F*** up this is.
On a serious note. He probably did not enjoy it or felt it was something to brag about considering how young he was so ya that's messed up. Then again if they were ugly Id have hated it to. . . You know what? The more I think about it the more F*** up this is.
Too many parents leave it up to schools to basically raise their children. Proper eating courses... etc. If you really have so little time to teach your child the basics that you will leave such duties to a complete stranger teaching 30 other kids the same thing and couldn't be arsed if one student out of that class is failing ... then what type of parent are you?Shio said:
I mean it's getting to the point that I think most Western countries would have better luck with the education system as it stands if parents merely had children and dropped them off at an 'Education Camp' when they hit 4 years of age.
Where they're all assigned a 'Student Identification Number' to wear on their all-grey tunics and slacks, tattooed into the back of their necks, and a central 'Scholarly Barracks' (assembled by Age) they have to report to 10 hours a day led by central disciplinarian and a militantly structured arm of Educators directly answerable to the 'Education Field Marshal' of the Ordo Paedagogus.
No time on the "outside", except periodic 'government work center' shifts each week.
I mean, parents already expect teachers with their whole 55 mins a week with their child to facilitate in not only filling their heads with knowledge, but teaching them to be ethical human beings. Seriously ... it's bullshit ... thge job shold be me, book, blackboard, 25 students ... if they listen they listen, if they don't they don't, if they don't listen and stop others from being able to listen they lose 10 lunch breaks cleaning the entire quadrangle.
Ahhh ... days of what are rapidly seeming like the "Golden Age" of parental responsibility.
women cant rape but they can sexually assault, but cant be charged because the government is retarded.Secret world leader (shhh) said:
You know, its stuff like this thats ruining America. ((this and the government))
All 3 of the should be labeled sexual offenders and thrown in Juvenal Hall for a few months.
If it were the other way around, it would probably be labeled 'Attempted Rape' and they wouldnt see the light of day until they were 40.
Why should we treat them any different because they're girls? Equality is the key here. We are all equal. As such, punishment should be equal.
All 3 of the should be labeled sexual offenders and thrown in Juvenal Hall for a few months.
If it were the other way around, it would probably be labeled 'Attempted Rape' and they wouldnt see the light of day until they were 40.
Why should we treat them any different because they're girls? Equality is the key here. We are all equal. As such, punishment should be equal.
honestly in some cases, charges should automatically be held against people. just because the mother doesn't want to deal with it these girls are getting away with it? it's ridiculous.