Look, you actually strike me as a reasonably intelligent person, which is why the bias in your posts shocks me so much.Deamon Toss said:I admit, its hard to keep your shit straight when its you vs 10+ and your typing so fast that you don't even have time to edit.Angry_squirrel said:I'm beginning to think you're just a troll.Deamon Toss said:Snip
Are you so arrogant to think that everyone else on this board is wrong and you are right? Sure, anon might not have done much, but how exactly is what they've done bad? You contradict yourself constantly, first you claim that the Syrian government probably don't even care about the hack, then you suggest that this hack may push them into killing more people? You say that anon are pathetic and have no power, but then rant about how many lives they ruin.
Yours is quite honestly the most biased argument I've heard in a long time.
Have anon done something that has seriously upset you personally?
all I can really respond to this is with "well fuck it."
Here is a question for you: Have you considered that maybe the reason your posts are being met with so much opposition is perhaps because you are wrong?
You said earlier that there are too many anon supporters in this thread. I disagree. Some of the people you're arguing against are actually anti-anon (I know I often am). In this case many of us are supporting anon, because in this case we believe they are in the right. That doesn't mean we blindly support their every action and refuse to admit they've ever done anything wrong - as you say, anon have done some pretty sick things - it just means that we support them on this particular occasion.