Exactly, you beat me to it.evilneko said:There is however a way ISPs could make such a short attack meaningless: increase the cache and TTL values on their own DNS, so that they don't have to go to the root servers.
GeorgW said:It is technically possible, and theoretically not that hard, but I'm very much hoping there's more than enough counter-measures against these sort of stuff. Also, why protest SOPA, something we've pretty much beat, and not ACTA, which is much worse and still relevant? I like the idea of such a massive protest, but there has to be better reasons for it...
Also, remember what all those sites shut down voluntarily? That's a whole lot better. I get the feeling Anon wanted to encourage people to do that again, except nobody really cares about Anon's agenda.
FUUUUCKIIIIING NINJAAAAAteqrevisited said:Come on now, Anonymous, that's just silly. Everyone knows that if you want to shut down the internet you'd have to fetch it down from Big Ben first. They're either going to need security clearance or a few dozen ladders.
That all depends on the cost of a pint... I mean you could be pretty broke after 20 or 30 beers if it lasts a while...Idlemessiah said:You know what happens when the internet goes down? I go to the pub. If they keep it up for a few days, I'll be spending a few days in the pub. So no great loss at all really.