Also this ^. It's light, it doesn't pass through opaque objects.Jaegerwolf said:Or, you know, just cover the receiver that will block the IR.weirdguy said:Y'know, all they'd have to do is figure out how to shut off the infrared receiver.
Had you considered the idea of mounting the ir sensor in with the camera module, or making it part of the camera itself?cfehunter said:Apple, patenting user restrictions since 2011.
Slapping your users with an enforced usage restriction with absolutely no benefit to them is not the way to regain that lost market share apple.
Also this ^. It's light, it doesn't pass through opaque objects.Jaegerwolf said:Or, you know, just cover the receiver that will block the IR.weirdguy said:Y'know, all they'd have to do is figure out how to shut off the infrared receiver.
So it's a pointless user restriction that can be bypassed with duct tape.....
Another reason why I don't have any of the apple products and will never buy any.Greg Tito said:Apple Patents Anti-Piracy Technology
Your iPhone might soon detect whether you are recording that concert and shut itself off.
Piracy is a bad thing. We all know that, right? Right? But I'm also not a big fan of corporations taking away the rights of consumers to use their products in ways the designers might not have intended. Apple is patenting technology which will add the ability for future iterations of the iPhone to automatically detect whether the user is capturing video of a musical performance or a film presentation and disable the camera.
The technology involved is somewhat ingenious. Movie theaters, for example, already use infrared signals broadcasting to individual hearing-aid devices and Apple intends for future iPhones to detect these signals, clueing the device into the fact that its user is watching a film. If you decide to take out your iPhone and perhaps record the X-Men: First Class this weekend, and then possibly upload that file for everyone to see, then you are violating IP law. The proposed technology would prevent you from ever transferring the movie into bits stored on your phone.
The same goes for music concerts, except that performers would have to start blasting infrared signals out into the audience for it to be effective. This I'm actually in favor of, because the amount of schmucks holding up an iPhone at concerts has got to be reduced somehow. What happened to actually enjoying the show? What's with all the freaking pictures, people?
Another, even wierder possibility is for the iPhone to automatically place a watermark over any image taken, instead of disabling photographs altogether. So you might be able to snap a shot at that Lady Gaga show, but the URL to LadyGaga.com will be emblazoned all over it. Ugh.
Now, on the other hand, this tech could be used for good and not for evil, by allowing museums or other landmarks to blast infrared data to the iPhone so that you could get a description of the landscape or historical document you are seeing. Kind of like a digital tour guide without the dirty headset.
Source: Patently Apple [http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2011/06/apple-working-on-a-sophisticated-infrared-system-for-ios-cameras.html]
Permalink
Of course. Bootlegging (or "real" piracy) is wrong. Sharing is rightGreg Tito said:Piracy is a bad thing. We all know that, right?
Yeah, God forbid you'd want to take a picture of something you've enjoyed so you can share a bit of the experience with friends who weren't there or look back on it 10 years later and say "man, I remember the song that was on when I took that shot". I mean, cameras are for taking shots of yourself in the bathroom mirror and slapping them onto Facebook, not immortalizing moments of your life, didn't you know that by now?Greg Tito said:The same goes for music concerts, except that performers would have to start blasting infrared signals out into the audience for it to be effective. This I'm actually in favor of, because the amount of schmucks holding up an iPhone at concerts has got to be reduced somehow. What happened to actually enjoying the show? What's with all the freaking pictures, people?
Apple has quite a knack for it. It's one of the reasons I'll likely never ever buy any of their products under penalty of death tbh. Fortunately, the iPhone doesn't have the monopoly on that market anymore.Thedek said:Why are big companies so consistently stupid?